similar to: zpool mirror (dumb question)

Full_Name: Jens Oehlschl?gel Version: 2.5.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (62.159.183.42) Even when specifying the full path, the output of fc is not sent to R (neither shown nor returned). For example > system('c:\\WINDOWS\\system32\\fc.exe /?',intern=TRUE) character(0) When I do the same from python 2.3, I get >>> import os >>>

Is there something special about filesystems mounted via the loop device, which prevents Samba from sharing them? I have a small LAN with several PCs on it. It has a few Windows machines, and a Linux machine running Mandrake 10 (kernel 2.6.3), which shares out its root ("/") read-only as "c". (Temporarily, for testing, it is shared with full write permissions, which I know

Hi. Several months ago, I posted my first pass at a patch to transfer Mac OS X HFS+ metadata (resource forks and Finder metadata) to non-HFS+ filesystems (Linux, Solaris, etc). I finally got a chance to update the patch to reflect suggestions offered on the list. Thanks for the ideas, this version should be a big improvement. The diff and a binary (and a fuller explanation) can be found at:

Hello, got a smb question. I used to run 2.0 and it worked fine. I had normal users and then a guest user with NULL PASSWD. I switched to 2.2 and I try to set up the same thing but I can't manage to get them both working simultaneously. I can have either one working just fine. I narrowed it down to encrypt passwords = (yes/no). I try to override the general user settings by a config file

Hi All, I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn''t a RAID 10 setup better for data protection? So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn''t I: - mirror drive 1 and 5 - mirror drive 2 and 6 - mirror drive 3 and 7 - mirror drive 4 and 8 Then stripe 1,2,3,4 Then stripe 5,6,7,8 How does one do this with ZFS?

Hi, I've recently benchmarked btrfs v0.11 & v0.12 against ext2, ext3, ext4, jfs, reiserfs and xfs. OS: Ubuntu Hardy Kernel: 2.6.24(-5-server) Hardware: --------- Fu-Si Primergy RX330 S1 * AMD Opteron 2210 1.8 GHz * 1 GB RAM * 3 x 73 GB, 3Gb/s, hot plug, 10k rpm, 3.5" SAS HDD * LSI RAID 128 MB Fu-Si Econel 200 * Intel Xeon 5110 * 512 MB RAM

Hey, guys I just do the test for use loop device as vdev for zpool Procedures as followings: 1) mkfile -v 100m disk1 mkfile -v 100m disk2 2) lofiadm -a disk1 /dev/lofi lofiadm -a disk2 /dev/lofi 3) zpool create pool_1and2 /dev/lofi/1 and /dev/lofi/2 4) zpool export pool_1and2 5) zpool import pool_1and2 error info here: bash-3.00# zpool import pool1_1and2 cannot import

Hi All, I''d like to set up dumping to a file. This file is on a mirrored pool using zfs. It seems that the dump setup doesn''t work with zfs. This worked for both a standard UFS slice and a SVM mirror using zfs. Is there something that I''m doing wrong, or is this not yet supported on ZFS? Note this is Solaris 10 Update 3, but I don''t think that should

I enjoy the convenience of mkfile command found in Irix and BSD based distros. This command allows me to make files of any size; usage: mkfile [-nv] size[b|k|m|g] filename ... I've looked here and there and can't seem to find it for Centos. Any one have ideas on were I can get at least the source for it? I got something off a BSD ports page but its for BSD type systems.

Hi all, How to reserve a space on a zfs filesystem? For mkfiel or dd will write data to the block, it is time consuming. whiel "mkfile -n" will not really hold the space. And zfs''s set reservation only work on filesytem, not on file? Could anyone provide a solution for this? Thanks very much Vincent

The message printed on disk resize is incorrect. The following is printed when resizing to 2 GiB: $ truncate -s 1G test.img $ qemu -device virtio-blk-pci,logical_block_size=4096,... (qemu) block_resize drive1 2G virtio_blk virtio0: new size: 4194304 4096-byte logical blocks (17.2 GB/16.0 GiB) The virtio_blk capacity config field is in 512-byte sector units regardless of

The message printed on disk resize is incorrect. The following is printed when resizing to 2 GiB: $ truncate -s 1G test.img $ qemu -device virtio-blk-pci,logical_block_size=4096,... (qemu) block_resize drive1 2G virtio_blk virtio0: new size: 4194304 4096-byte logical blocks (17.2 GB/16.0 GiB) The virtio_blk capacity config field is in 512-byte sector units regardless of

Hi, I am able to reproduce the following panic on a number of Solaris 10 06/06 boxes (Sun Blade 150, V210 and T2000). The script to do this is: #!/bin/sh -x uname -a mkfile 100m /data zpool create tank /data zpool status cd /tank ls -al cp /etc/services . ls -al cd / rm /data zpool status # uncomment the following lines if you want to see the system think # it can still read and write to the

We are running Solaris 10 11/06 on a Sun V240 with 2 CPUS and 8 GB of memory. This V240 is attached to a 3510 FC that has 12 x 300 GB disks. The 3510 is configured as HW RAID 5 with 10 disks and 2 spares and it''s exported to the V240 as a single LUN. We create iso images of our product in the following way (high-level): # mkfile 3g /isoimages/myiso # lofiadm -a /isoimages/myiso

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

On 02/27/2010 10:31 PM, swdamle at bsnl.in wrote: > Hello, > This has reference to ""Dos installer" from Win98se in Syslinux-3.84. > > Sorry to say the problem CONTINUES with Syslinux-3.85. Following is > for your reference please. > You may want to try: http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/syslinux/syslinux.com ... which is compiled with debugging information turned

Hi all, i want to replace a bunch of Apple Xserves with Xraids and HFS+ (brr) by Sun x4200 with SAS-Jbods and ZFS. The application will be the Helios UB+ fileserver suite. I installed the latest Solaris 10 on a x4200 with 8gig of ram and two Sun SAS controllers, attached two sas-jbods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following: [i]zpool create

Hi all, I received my SSD, and wanted to test it out using fake zpools with files as backing stores before attaching it to my production pool. However, when I exported the test pool and imported, I get an error. Here is what I did: I created a file to use as a backing store for my new pool: mkfile 1g /data01/test2/1gtest Created a new pool: zpool create ziltest2 /data01/test2/1gtest Added the

Previous implementation had staticly defined partitions to remove. This would break in the case of split Root and HostVG devices. Signed-off-by: Mike Burns <mburns at redhat.com> --- scripts/ovirt-config-boot | 11 +-------- scripts/ovirt-config-uninstall | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- scripts/ovirt-functions | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files

Hi, Just playing with zfs and the admin manual ... # mkfile 100m /export/zfs/disk1 # zpool create data /export/zfs/disk1 # zfs create data/users # zfs mount -o remount,noatime data/users # zfs get all data/users NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE data/users type filesystem - data/users creation Mon Nov 20 11:25 2006