similar to: destroy failure with has_many associative table without id

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1729 Summary: Bash environmental associative arrays not getting set Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Prototype.js seems to extend the standard javascript array constructor. It adds some methods and properties. If I do the for (key in array) I get additional keys that I didn’t add. ________________________________ Von: rails-spinoffs-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org] Im Auftrag von Gregory Hill Gesendet: Freitag, 11. November 2005 16:35

Hi, My test case has two fixtures and eight methods. But one of the eight methods need one more fixture. How do I solve this? Okay, I put the additional fixture in common place so every method has additional access to the additional fixture. The problem is the additional fixture depend on that two fixtures (foreign key). When I run the test, it complains something like this:

Let me preface my question by stressing that I am much less interested in the answer than in learning a way I could have *found the answer myself*. (As helpful as the participants in this list are, I have far too many R-related questions to resolve by posting here, and as I've written before, in my experience the R documentation has not been very helpful, but I remain hopeful that I may have

Hi i am getting following error ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid in Blog#index Showing app/views/blog/index.rhtml where line #10 raised: Mysql::Error: #42S22Unknown column ''posts.user_id'' in ''where clause'': SELECT * FROM posts WHERE (posts.user_id = 4) Extracted source (around line #10): 7: <div class="separator">&nbsp;</div> 8:

Hi List! Is there a way to iterate through an associative array when prototype.js is used? arrayname.each(function (i) { alert(i); }); seems to work only for numeric arrays. Thanks, Josef Stich _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org

I have the following many-to-many relationships defined in my model code to model a many to many relationship between Media and PriceCode with Price being the association table: class Media < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :prices has_many :price_codes, :through => :prices end class Price < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :media belongs_to :price_code end class PriceCode <

Hi all, are there a way to define a associative array/Hash? example: $host = [{ :name => ''host1'', :ip => ''192.168.10.1'' }, { :name => ''host2'', :ip => ''192.168.10.2'' }] Regards --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Hi, can someone tell me how to use associative arrays in R? It can be a hashtable or some kind of tree, as long as the lookups aren't O(n). One way to do this is to use names, e.g. in: list(a=3, ...)[["a"]] presumably looking up "a" is very quick. (Can someone tell me offhand how that is implemented? Hashtable?) However, if I wanted to, say, memoize a numeric

Hi, Two questions: A) Assuming OB is an object, how do I store 20 of OB in a vector or list ? B) Does R has something similar associative array to Perl ? For example, %our_friends = ('best', 'Don', 'good', 'Robert', 'worst', 'Joe'); $our_friends{'cool'} = "Karen"; Thanks Stanley [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

i need to delete a record from the database and delete all of it''s children as well. is there a method for this? right now, i am finding all the children with the parent_id and destroying them first and then destroying the parent. seems like there would be a better way to do this but i can''t seem to figure it out. thanks, josh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

has_many.count does not seem to support an options hash like ActiveRecord::Base.count does. Example: >> AcademicProgram.find(:first).course_requirements.count :conditions => "courses.name LIKE ''a%''", :include => :course => 40 >> ap.ap_requirements.count :conditions => "courses.name LIKE ''a%''", :include =>

In my application model I have three classes: Accounts, Projects, and Items class Accounts < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :items, :through => :projects, :source => :items has_many :late_items, :class_name => ''Item'', :through => :projects, :conditions => [''due_on < ?'', Time.now], :source => :items end class Projects <

I have the following model structure setup. class User < ActiveRecord::Base end class Parent < User has_many :relationships has_many :children, :class_name => "Student", :through => :relationships, :conditions => "related_as = ''parent''" end class Student < User has_many :relationships

Hello all, I''m trying to initialize my migrations against a current database implementation. rake db:schema:dump runs without error. The resulting schema.rb is pasted below, along with my database.yml Can one of you point me in the direction of enlightenment? -- ------------------------------ Apple MacBook. Black. It''s the new White! ------------------------------ Peter

Perhaps I missed something but I don''t see an easy way to do this ? Basically just wanna hold some ui state in a cookie. Did I miss something obvious ? Best Matt *********************************************************************************** The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorized and

The following combine(-enabling transformation) makes me uncomfortable:   gep(addrspacecast(gep p0) to p1)   addrspacecast(gep(gep p0)) to p1 It's applied at visitAddrSpaceCast in InstCombineCasts.cpp. Before this, I'd always assumed address spaces were very much "user domain". Datalayout even supports marking a space as "non-integral", to designate that manipulation as

Hi guys! I''m developoning a small web-app, everything goes quickly and well!! I need some help, im trying to destroy at the same time some records of varius of my models. My model are relathionate with has_many, has_one. What could be the best way to do it? Could i use act_as_a_tree or there are other cool way? Thanks P.D: Sorry by my bad english

> What do you mean exactly by "behave differently on the other side of the cast”? Do you have a concrete example? I was hesitant to say only in that it is probably an "abuse of mechanics" and definitely playing with fire, _however_ the target I'm working on has extensive bit operations for a subset of memory, including atomic test-and-set, etc. It's convenient to be

The build failed. CHANGES ------- Revision 8649 committed by gbuesing on 2008-01-16 20:07:10 Introducing DateTime #utc, #utc? and #utc_offset, for duck-typing compatibility with Time. Closes #10002 M /trunk/activesupport/CHANGELOG M /trunk/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/date_time/calculations.rb M /trunk/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_time_ext_test.rb TEST FAILURES AND