similar to: FW: Import a SAN cloned disk

just a side note: as of 3/12/2003 I could not get ices0x from cvs to compile without errors. the nightly snapsot compiled fine <p><p><p><p>----- Original Message ----- From: Brendan Cully To: icecast@xiph.org Sent: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:15:01 -0500 Subject: Re: [icecast] libshout1-based mp3 streaming to icecast2 Sorry to follow up on my own post, but you may find it more

I was investigating an error diagnostic in the following test example: typedef signed char char16 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16))); void test( char16 srcA, char16 srcB, char16 *dst) { *dst = ( srcA == srcB ); } which produces the message: mismatch.c:5:10: error: assigning to 'char16' from incompatible type 'char __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16)))' *dst = (

Hi Martin, On Oct 2, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Martin O'Riordan <Martin.ORiordan at movidius.com> wrote: > I was investigating an error diagnostic in the following test example: > > typedef signed char char16 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16))); > > void test( char16 srcA, char16 srcB, char16 *dst) { > *dst = ( srcA == srcB ); > } > > which produces the

I was investigating an error diagnostic in the following test example: typedef signed char char16 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16))); void test( char16 srcA, char16 srcB, char16 *dst) { *dst = ( srcA == srcB ); } which produces the message: mismatch.c:5:10: error: assigning to 'char16' from incompatible type 'char __attribute__((ext_vector_type(16)))' *dst = (

Andrew Ruef wrote: > Evening, > > I was writing some code that tried to insert calls to the > llvm.annotation intrinsic function, which has a signature of (i32, > i8*, i8*, i32). The code is below. > > void addAnnotation( BasicBlock *block, Function *F) > { > string foo = "foo"; > string bar = "barr"; > > Type

Evening, I was writing some code that tried to insert calls to the llvm.annotation intrinsic function, which has a signature of (i32, i8*, i8*, i32). The code is below. void addAnnotation( BasicBlock *block, Function *F) { string foo = "foo"; string bar = "barr"; Type *charTy = Type::getInt8Ty(block->getContext()); ArrayType *s1Ty =

Does anyone on the list have definitive information on whether ZFS works with CLARiiON devices? bash-3.00# uname -a SunOS XXXXXXX 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V245 bash-3.00# powermt display dev=all Pseudo name=emcpower0a CLARiiON ID=APM00033500540 [XXXXXXX] Logical device ID=600601607C550E00F25F4629AFBEDB11 [LUN 61] state=alive; policy=BasicFailover; priority=0; queued-IOs=0

hello folks, I am running Solaris 10 U3 and I have small problem that I dont know how to fix... I had a pool of two drives: bash-3.00# zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 emcpower0a ONLINE 0 0 0 emcpower1a ONLINE

I'm running Samba (and will apply 2.2.1 now, since Clarion fails with it) as a PDC and as a Clarion database server. What are the directions to configure Samba to be accessed by DOS running Clarion database? Which are the main keys in smb.conf should I set? Thank you. Alano Stolf alano@alania.com.br -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and

All, I am running Samba 3.0.25a on Solaris 8 and I am getting this error message in the /usr/local/samba/var/log.swat log when attempting to start swat: [2007/06/28 11:32:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1232) getpeername failed. Error was Socket operation on non-socket [2007/06/28 11:32:24, 0] lib/access.c:check_access(327) [2007/06/28 11:32:24, 0]

Running Solaris 8 in a Sun E-250 and when I attempted to upgrade a working Samba install from version 3.0.24 to version 3.0.25a I got this error: ------------------------------------------ # pkgadd -d samba-3.0.25a-sol8-sparc-local The following packages are available: 1 SMCsamba samba (sparc) 3.0.25a Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to

On 06/25/2015 01:20 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > ...It's basically a way to assemble one arbitrary set of block devices > and then divide them into another arbitrary set of block devices, but > now separate from the underlying physical structure. > Regular partitions have various limitations (one big one on Linux > being that modifying the partition table of a disk with in-use

I have the following configuation. My storage: 12 luns from a Clariion 3x80. Each LUN is a whole 6 disk raid-6. My host: Sun t5240 with 32 hardware threads and 16gig of ram. My zpool: all 12 luns from the clariion in a simple pool My test data: A 1 gig backup file of a ufsdump from /opt on a machine with lots of mixed binary/text data. A 15gig file that is already tightly compressed. I wrote

That should say below, we are using Powerpath on the CX300's AND the CX600's... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- We are using Powerpath with CX300's and Emulex HBA's, also with OCFS on Red Hat 2.1 AS. Kernel upgrades are the biggest issue that we have, as some of the drivers are dependent on modules built for specific kernels, and if your

Hello All. I'm working on building support for the Clariion range of standby power supplies. I've found you can get hold of these easily on ebay like: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/EMC-CLARiiON-Standby-Power-Supply-118031985- SPS-1000W-/160373295258 There is a problem that I haven't been able to work around. After 90 seconds without power, the device shuts down. This is because

I may be nuts, but... I would appear that rsync is not setting the exit code properly when it fails. Below are 2 cases where that seems obvious, the line with the '0' after the output is 'echo $?' from bash -- aka the exit code for the last command. Let me know if these are bugs, or I need to somehow get around these situations. Nic >>> starting rsync with

On 6/29/20 11:20 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > ... > In the event of a power loss, many servers will boot faster than the > managed Ethernet switch they are attached to.? Systems managed by > network-scripts may not set up their network because there is no > carrier at the time that networks-scripts start up. > > Network-manager, on the other hand, will set up networking

A couple years ago, we moved to Oracle RAC on Linux using ocfs that is SAN attached to an EMC CLARiiON. At the time, there was a reason that we did NOT use EMC's Powerpath (I just can't recall what that reason was). What I'd like to know is if there are any issues with introducing Powerpath now. * RHEL 2.1 AS * 2.4.9-e.38enterprise * ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.13-1 * EMC

Dear all, > Caveats > ======= > Features which OCFS2 does not support yet: > - extended attributes > - readonly mount > - shared writeable mmap > - loopback is supported, but data written will not > be cluster coherent. > - quotas > - cluster aware flock <---------------------------------------- >

I have a couple EMC relabled ACBEL/Polytech UPSs which I'm unable to find anything about. What I do know is that ACBEL/Polytech is CoolerMaster, however, they don't make UPSs that I know of. These UPSs were used as part of an EMC Clarion array. Does anyone know anything about these? Thanks, Mark. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: