similar to: X45xx storage vs 7xxx Unified storage

the built version of R (built using shared libraries) doesn't appear to find tcl/tk: Please help. Details: SGI configuration: 7.3.1.3m compilers from SGI uname -aR = IRIX64 mendel 6.5 6.5.16f 04101930 IP35 We built R on an SGI system using the following configure script: # explicitly choose vendor compilers for R rather than GNU # optimise output to support highest level of performance

I would like to Build R-2.5.1 on OpenSUSE 10.2 using the SunStudio 12 compilers(http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/index.jsp) R builds and passes make check fine without optimising. However, when I try to compile with optimisation turned on (-fast) the build gets stuck in an infinite loop at the following point: Sun_Studio/sunstudio12/bin/cc -m64 -shared -Kpic -m64 -fPIC -o grDevices.so

While I understand everything at Oracle is "top secret" these days. Does anyone have any insight into a next-gen X4500 / X4540? Does some other Oracle / Sun partner make a comparable system that is fully supported by Oracle / Sun? http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/previous-products/index.html What do X4500 / X4540 owners use if they''d like more

In a previous thread I had problems on openSuse 10.2 building R with optimisation and discovered that if I wanted optimisation I need to turn on -fstore -fsimple1 (the first is to force storage on some Fortran routines , the second is to ensure IEEE arithmetic, with some optimisation). That worked for my desktop. The real problem is to work on our servers (Opterons running SLES9SP3) Make works

I am trying to coordinate properties and data between 2 file servers. on file server 1 I have: zfs get all zfs52/export/os/sles10sp2 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE zfs52/export/os/sles10sp2 type filesystem - zfs52/export/os/sles10sp2 creation Mon Mar 22 15:28 2010

Hi, I understand that the glm.fit calls LINPACK fortran routines instead of LAPACK because it can handle the 'rank deficiency problem'. If my data matrix is not rank deficient, would a glm.fit function which runs on LAPACK be faster? Would this be worthwhile to convert glm.fit to use LAPACK? Has anyone done this already?? What is the best way to do this? I'm looking at very

We''re using some X4540s, with OpenSolaris 2008.11. According to my testing, to optimize our systems for our specific workload, I''ve determined that we get the best performance with the write cache disabled on every disk, and with zfs:zfs_nocacheflush=1 set in /etc/system. The only issue is setting the write cache permanently, or at least quickly. Right now, as it is,

Hello, In my smb.conf (or actually, in "committees.conf" included from smb.conf, a defined share does not show up in the browselist, nor any other share defined AFTER that particular one (either in that file or in smb.conf after the include statement). The shares are accessable though (when mapped to a drive letter or used as UNC). Ofcourse I tried to look for odd

On Wed 07/01/09 20:31 , Carsten Aulbert carsten.aulbert at aei.mpg.de sent: > Brent Jones wrote: > > > > Using mbuffer can speed it up dramatically, but > > this seems like a hack> without addressing a real problem with zfs > > send/recv.> Trying to send any meaningful sized snapshots > > from say an X4540 takes> up to 24 hours, for as little as 300GB

Dear list, we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5 Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are already seen by multipathd. Problem is, that the Sun 7310 has two storage heads which run in

Estimados, Junto con saludar, agradecer? si alguien me pueda ayudar con un problema que tengo: Tengo una base de datos llamada "BD", la cu?l posee 300 columnas y 2800 filas, tengo una columna llamada "DIVISION" que se compone de dos d?gitos. Lo que quiero hacer, pero no s? como es: Generar una nueva columna (adicional), llamada "SECCION" que me clasifique con letras

Hi! I know this is a little bit offtopic, but i couldn't think of any other place where i can get uninfluenced first hand information on these controllers :) I've read about and experienced data loss/system lockup with older 3ware controllers, but the 3ware Escalade 7xxx (i'm especially interested in the 7850) sounds too good to ignore it (8 channels, 8 drives, raid 0/1/5/10,

I am trying to setup an extension of *7XXX that will allow me to dial *7 and then any extension and use the Pickup application to pickup a ringing phone. Ideally it will also check if the phone is ringing somehow and then either dial the extension or pick it up if it is ringing. But I can't get that far. If I use *7268 specially it works fine, but as soon as I introduce any wild

Hello, While shopping for another 3Ware card, I found that this market has gotten much larger since I bought my 6500. So I started looking at the various cards while browsing the hardware notes for FreeBSD 4.8 and 5.1. So I'm wondering if anyone can provide some insight here. -3Ware has a whole new series of cards. The twe(4) manpage states that only 5xxx and 6xxx series cards are

He tratado de usar lo siguiente: a<- ifelse(BD$Divisi?n>=50 & BD$Divisi?n<59,"D", ifelse (BD$Divisi?n>=60 & BD$Divisi?n<=69,"G", ifelse (BD$Divisi?n>=70 & BD$Divisi?n<=79,"L", ifelse (BD$Divisi?n>=80 &

I have a Sun 7310 storage server. This is running Solaris 10 but it's self-contained and I can't login to it or run Samba on it. I manage it with a web interface. I have a CentOS 5.3 machine that mounts a bunch of file systems via NFS from the Sun server. This works fine. I installed Samba 3.4.5 on the CentOS machine and configured it to share some of the directories that are actually NFS

Has anyone gotten centos 4 to print on an officejet 7310? I have tried jetdirect with pcl and postcript no go... I have tried smb but it does seem to be browsable as its not listed and when I specify I enter the IP address for server and I dont know what the share is. Windows XP connects and prints fine. THanks, Jerry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've searched the mailing list quite extensively, but didn't come up with anything promising (some things wer helpful, though). Does anyone know if Nortel M Series (specifically the 2008, 2616, 7208, and 7310) phones can be made to work with the TDM400P card or if they are ADSI compatible at all? I kind of doubt they will work if they are

How do you setup * so that a user can transfer a call directly into someone's voicemail? Damian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040515/7324407e/attachment.htm

Hi Someone may give me an example of followme() application using in a dialplan (including what to configure in followme.conf) ? I use asterisk 1.6.1 so if your example can match to that release it's will be wonderfull. Thank in advance. Harry. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: