similar to: [indiana-discuss] Boot failure with snv_122 and snv_123

brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM. Olga On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:31 PM, <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote: > > >>Just a completely different question...is there any plans

On 5/5/10 1:44 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:19 -0600, Evan Layton wrote: >> Can you try the following and see if it really thinks it''s an EFI lable? >> # dd if=/dev/dsk/c12t0d0s2 of=x skip=512 bs=1 count=10 >> # cat x >> >> This may help us determine if this is another instance of bug 6860320 > > # dd

anyone? -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Robert Milkowski <milek at task.gda.pl> Subject: [osol-code] snv_123: kernel memory leak? Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:03:09 PDT Size: 44844 URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20091022/2fcfa8d6/attachment.eml>

hello all, i have indiana freshly installed on a sun ultra 20 machine. It only does nfs server. During one night, the kernel had crashed, and i got this messages: " May 22 02:18:57 ultra20 unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice] May 22 02:18:57 ultra20 ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=ffffff0003d06c80: May 22 02:18:57 ultra20 genunix: [ID 603766 kern.notice] assertion failed: sm->sm_space == 0 (0x40000000 ==

There seems to be no list of needed packages, when starting with a fresh opensolaris dev (b121 today). hg gmake I guessed by now. Additionally the stuff mentioned here: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/building_on/ But are there further packages needed? Maybe some one should add a verified list to the building howtos... Florian

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Brent Jones<brent at servuhome.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:00 AM, James Lever<j at jamver.id.au> wrote: >> >> On 25/06/2009, at 4:38 PM, John Ryan wrote: >> >>> Can I ask the same question - does anyone know when the 113 build will >>> show up on pkg.opensolaris.org/dev ? >> >> On

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Dave <dave-opensolaris at dubkat.com> wrote: > I don''t want Solaris to import any pools at bootup, even when there were > pools imported at shutdown/at crash time. The process to prevent > importing pools should be automatic and not require any human > intervention. I want to *always* import the pools manually. > > Hrm... what

Hello Ross, We''re trying to accomplish the same goal over here, ie. serving multiple VMware images from a NFS server. Could you tell what kind of NVRAM device did you end up choosing? We bought a Micromemory PCI card but can''t get a Solaris driver for it... Thanks Gilberto On 7/6/08 9:54 AM, "zfs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org" <zfs-discuss-request at

You could always use 40-gigabit between the two storage systems which would speed things dramatically, or back to back 56-gigabit IB. ---------------------------------------- From: zfs-discuss-request@opensolaris.org Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:01 PM To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: zfs-discuss Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12 Send zfs-discuss mailing list submissions to

Please check whether you have latest '' MPT '' patch installed on your server ? If not , please install MPT patch . It will fix the issue . Regards, Gowrisankar . On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:30 PM, <zfs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org>wrote: > Send zfs-discuss mailing list submissions to > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe

There''s not much that CIFS can do as far as user quotas go without filesystem support. I''ve CC''ed zfs-discuss, somebody there might be able to provide you something useful. Afshin Ross wrote: > Not sure if this is the best place to ask about this. I know ZFS doesn''t have user quotas, but is there any chance something like this could be added to CIFS? >

I don''t know if VSS has this capability, but essentially if it can temporarily quiesce a device like a data base does for "warm standby" then a snapshot should work. This would be a very simple Windows side script/batch: 1) Q-Disk 2) Remote trigger snapshot 3) Un Q-Disk I have no idea where to even begin researching VSS unfortunately... James (Sent from my mobile)

Hi, Bug ID: 6775100 stat() performance on files on zfs should be improved was fixed in snv_119. I wanted to do a quick comparison between snv_117 and snv_122 on my workstation to see what kind of improvement there is. I wrote a small C program which does a stat() N times in a loop. This is of course a micro-benchmark. Additionally it doesn''t cover a case if doing stat() on not cached

Jeff Creek wrote: > I posted this in ZFS-Discuss. Eric Schrock suggested I ask in this forum. > > I am trying to test a new setup of NV74. I have set up the system with ZFS boot. Everything works fine until I pull a drive. The system locks up when I try to run any command e.g. zpool status. There is no communication with the server from then on. It does not even respond to pings. >

I hope to see everyone on the other side... *************************************** The ZFS discussion list is moving to java.net. This opensolaris/zfs discussion will not be available after March 24. There is no way to migrate the existing list to the new list. The solaris-zfs project is here: http://java.net/projects/solaris-zfs See the steps below to join the ZFS project or just the

The ZFS crew might be better to answer this question. (CC''d here) --jc William Yang wrote: > I am having issues creating a zpool using entire disks with a fibre > channel array. The array is a Dell PowerVault 660F. > When I run "zpool create bottlecap c6t21800080E512C872d14 > c6t21800080E512C872d15", I get the following error: > invalid vdev

Paul, > While testing iscsi targets exported from thumpers via 10GbE and > imported 10GbE on T2000s I am not seeing the throughput I expect, > and more importantly there is a tremendous amount of read IO > happending on a purely sequential write workload. (Note all systems > have Sun 10GbE cards and are running Nevada b65.) The read IO activity you are seeing is a direct

Hello, I am a final year computer engg student and I am planning to implement zfs on linux, I have gone through the articles posted on solaris . Please let me know about the feasibility of zfs to be implemented on linux. waiting for valuable replies. thanks in advance. On 9/14/07, zfs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org <zfs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org> wrote: > Send

this is off list on purpose ? > run zpool import, it will search all attached storage and give you a list > of availible pools. then run zpool import poolname or add a -f if you > didn''t export before the install/upgrade. assume worst case someone walks up to you and drops an array on you. They say "its ZFS an'' I need that der stuff ''k? " all

Hello, I tried to disable loading of the zfs module by adding "exclude zfs" in /etc/system. I rebooted and got into "maintainance mode" with many services disbaled (as svcs -xv shows). I don''t have any zfs partitons on this machine. So my question is: for what is the zfs module in booting of solaris ? Why can''t it be disabled? Regards, David This message