similar to: [Fwd: snv_123: kernel memory leak?]

Hi, OSOL, b118 > milek at r600:~# flowadm show-flow > FLOW LINK IPADDR PROTO PORT > DSFLD > local_25 iwh0 -- tcp 25 -- > local_22 iwh0 -- tcp 22 -- > milek at r600:~# flowadm show-flow -s -i 1 > FLOW IPACKETS RBYTES IERRORS

Hello zfs-code, http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/vdev_cache.c 72 * All i/os smaller than zfs_vdev_cache_max will be turned into 73 * 1<<zfs_vdev_cache_bshift byte reads by the vdev_cache (aka software 74 * track buffer). At most zfs_vdev_cache_size bytes will be kept in each 75 * vdev''s vdev_cache. While it

Hello zfs-discuss, http://milek.blogspot.com/2007/04/hw-raid-vs-zfs-software-raid-part-iii.html -- Best regards, Robert Milkowski mailto:rmilkowski at task.gda.pl http://milek.blogspot.com

Hello zfs-discuss, I wonder if ZFS will be able to take any advantage of Niagara''s built-in crypto? -- Best regards, Robert Milkowski mailto:rmilkowski at task.gda.pl http://milek.blogspot.com

Hello zfs-discuss, If you do ''zpool create -f test A B C spare D E'' and D or E contains UFS filesystem then despite of -f zpool command will complain that there is UFS file system on D. workaround: create a test pool with -f on D and E, destroy it and that create first pool with D and E as hotspares. I''ve tested it on s10u3 + patches - can someone confirm

Hello zfs-discuss, S10U4+patches, SPARC If I attach a disk to vdev in a pool to get mirrored configuration then during resilver zpool iostat 1 will report only reads being done from pool and basically no writes. If I do zpool iostat -v 1 then I can see it is writing to new device however on a pool and mirror/vdev level it is still reporting only reads. If during resilvering reads

Hi, osol-0906 (b111b), ISC DHCP 4.0.0 I''m trying to install a client over PXE as: root@mk-xvm-1:~# virt-install --hvm --name node-6 --ram 1024 --os-type=solaris --network bridge=vmswitch0 -f /xvm/guests/node-6/root -s 5 --pxe In the VNC console I can see: [...] [rtl8139] - ioaddr 0XC200, irq 5, addr 00:16:3E:22:D8:C2 100Mbps half-duplex Searching for server (DHCP)....No IP address .No

Hello zfs-discuss, What would you rather propose for ZFS+ORACLE - zvols or just files from the performance standpoint? -- Best regards, Robert mailto:rmilkowski at task.gda.pl http://milek.blogspot.com

Hello zfs-discuss, Just to be sure - if I create ZFS filesystems on snv_39 and then later I would want just to import that pool on S10U2 - can I safely assume it will just work (I mean nothing new to on-disk format was added or changed in last few snv releases which is not going to be in u2)? I want to put right now (I have to do it now) some data on ZFS and later I want to

Hello zfs-discuss, I''m writing a script to do automatically snapshots and destroy old one. I think it would be great to add to zfs destroy another option so only snapshots can be destroyed. Something like: zfs destroy -s SNAPSHOT so if something other than snapshot is provided as an argument zfs destroy wouldn''t actually destroy it. That way it would

Hello Nico, Friday, January 19, 2007, 7:53:06 PM, you wrote: NVdM> Hi, NVdM> Looking if someone already found a solution, or workaround, to change the GUID of a zfs pool. NVdM> Explain me some more in depth, by use of tools like ShadowImage NVdM> on storage Arrays like the Sun Storagetek 99xx (but also for SUN NVdM> related storage Arrays or IBM, EMC and other storage vendors)

Hello zfs-discuss, http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6604198-1 Is there a patch for S10? I thought it''s been fixed. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:rmilkowski at task.gda.pl http://milek.blogspot.com

Hello zfs-discuss, Is someone actually working on it? Or any other algorithms? Any dates? -- Best regards, Robert mailto:rmilkowski at task.gda.pl http://milek.blogspot.com

Hello zfs-discuss, Relatively low traffic to the pool but sync takes too long to complete and other operations are also not that fast. Disks are on 3510 array. zil_disable=1. bash-3.00# ptime sync real 1:21.569 user 0.001 sys 0.027 During sync zpool iostat and vmstat look like: f3-1 504G 720G 370 859 995K 10.2M misc 20.6M 52.0G 0 0

Hi, When deploying ZFS in cluster environment it would be nice to be able to have some SSDs as local drives (not on SAN) and when pool switches over to the other node zfs would pick up the node''s local disk drives as L2ARC. To better clarify what I mean lets assume there is a 2-node cluster with 1sx 2540 disk array. Now lets put 4x SSDs in each node (as internal/local drives). Now

Has this issue been solved yet? I see the same issue when trying to upgrade from 112 to 126. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi, Bug ID: 6775100 stat() performance on files on zfs should be improved was fixed in snv_119. I wanted to do a quick comparison between snv_117 and snv_122 on my workstation to see what kind of improvement there is. I wrote a small C program which does a stat() N times in a loop. This is of course a micro-benchmark. Additionally it doesn''t cover a case if doing stat() on not cached

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I would like to know the blocksize of a particular file. I know the blocksize for a particular file is decided at creation time, in fuction of the write size done and the recordsize property of the dataset. How can I access that information?. Some zdb magic?. - -- Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ jcea at

> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Calvin Liu wrote: > >> I want to run command "rm Dis*" in a folder but mis-typed a space in it >> so it became "rm Dis *". Unfortunately I had pressed the return button >> before I noticed the mistake. So you all know what happened... :( :( :( > > Ouch! > >> How can I get the files back in this case? > > You

Hi, I''d like to move a disk from one controller to another. This disk is part of a mirror in a zfs pool. How can one do this without having to export/import the pool or reboot the system? I tried taking it offline and online again, but then zpool says the disk is unavailable. Trying a zpool replace didn''t work because it complains that the "new" disk is part of a