similar to: domU startup freezes at "Starting plymouth"

I recently started having this issue after enabling nat networking for my domU. The domU is booting the 2.6.32.27 kernel with an initrd i generated and was using before just fine. Output is as follows. Any help would be appreciated. Here is the output I get: 0.161289] xvde1: detected capacity change from 0 to 10486808576 > [ 0.260033] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/console/0

Hi all, Is anyone successfully running/has succesfully upgraded to 2.6.32-220 from, say, 2.6.32-71.29.1? (i.e. done a normal run-of-the-mill yum update on, say a 6.0 instance all the way up cleanly to 6.2? Reason I ask is that booting into -220 (and I think also into -131 as well) results in a kernel panic for me. Some digging around and the new kernel seems to be enumerating the drives with the

Hi guys, first of all, thanks a lot for all guys preparing for official CentOS AMIs on Amazon Marketplace! However, I have noticed a problem on a swap device when I launch a m1.small instance with the official AMI. AWS prepares two local storages for m1.small and c1.medium; one is for 160GB instance store storage, and the other is for a storage for the swap space, described in:

Hi, I installed F14 on release, but was diquieted to note that my symlinked GotoBLAS (http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Shared-BLAS, foot of paragraph) prevented R (compiled from source, no special configure options) from loading - everything had been fine on F < 14. It seems that: cat /selinux/booleans/allow_execstack is 1 1 on my RHEL systems, but became (?) 0 0 in F14.

root@boris-P5Q-E:/mnt/usr/tmp# losetup -f ubuntu11.04.iso root@boris-P5Q-E:/mnt/usr/tmp# losetup -a /dev/loop0: [0809]:406494 (/mnt/usr/tmp/ubuntu11.04.iso) root@boris-P5Q-E:~/vms/natty# cat natty.hvm name = "NattyHVM" builder = "hvm" memory = "2048" disk = [''phy:/dev/sda5,hda,w'', ''phy:/dev/loop0,hdc:cdrom,r''] vif = [

root@boris-P5Q-E:/mnt/usr/tmp# losetup -f ubuntu11.04.iso root@boris-P5Q-E:/mnt/usr/tmp# losetup -a /dev/loop0: [0809]:406494 (/mnt/usr/tmp/ubuntu11.04.iso) root@boris-P5Q-E:~/vms/natty# cat natty.hvm name = "NattyHVM" builder = "hvm" memory = "2048" disk = [''phy:/dev/sda5,hda,w'', ''phy:/dev/loop0,hdc:cdrom,r''] vif = [

(oops accidentally sent to -owners) Hi, i'm trying to start a LXC guest on a F14 computer .. followed the examples in http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html, but got stuck when starting it .. 03:07:23.706: debug : virCgroupNew:542 : New group / 03:07:23.707: debug : lxcControllerRun:563 : Setting up private /dev/pts 03:07:23.711: debug : lxcControllerRun:589 : Mouting 'devpts' on

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:56:50PM -0500, Greg Scott wrote: > OK, thanks. I just did a yum install virt-v2v on a Fedora 14 VM - but > the man pages don't have anything about how to do physical machines. I > already have a p2v CD built with virt-p2v-image-builder a while ago. I > boot my source server from that CD - what do I do on the Fedora 14 > conversion VM? How do I

Just wondering why kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot make itself into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora''s Libvirt has the best compatibility with Xen 4.0.1. It''s not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7 aka Suse is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops

On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 21:59 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > try adding 'map to guest = Bad User' to smb.conf > > Rowland > IT WORKED!!! THANK YOU. Now the XP machine can see both the f14 and f20 shares. (It was not even necessary to restart nmbd or smbd on the f20 machines.) Now, if I'm not asking for too much, can you please explain why this worked. :-) Many thanks

Hello, I upgraded my kvm server from Fedora 14 to Fedora 16 and the only casualty was a Windows 2003 Server client that will no longer boot with and produces a BSOD. I admittedly know very little about Windows and this VM has been around - real hardware -> Parallels on a Mac -> linux kvm but it was working fine under Fedora 14. The client does boot fine under safe mode but anything higher

On my CentOS 6.3 machine, in /etc/idmapd.conf I've updated the "[Mapping]" section of the config file: Nobody-User = paulbsch Nobody-Group = paulbsch But the mapping is not working. Files still show up as being owned by "nobody". On my Fedora 14 machine, with the exact same changes to /etc/idmapd.conf, the mapping works perfectly and the files show up as being owned by

Hello, A windows XP machine 'X' (the only one left in the LAN) sees all fedora14/samba3 shares on f14 machine 'A' but cannot see fedora20/samba4 shares on machines 'B' or 'C'. 'X' can ping all of the others by name, and all of the others 'A', 'B' and 'C' CAN see ALL of the other shares INCLUDING on the XP machine 'X'.

Marc, et al, Thanks for your reply. Sorry, I didn't mean to be confusing. Summary of problem: 1) XP sees samba shares on fedora14/samba3 machine, but not on fedora20/samba4 machines. 2) all fedora machines see all shares including on XP machine. 3) clicking on f20 machine from XP tries to log in rather than showing the shares. Login is not successful. 4) all machines can ping each

Hello, I have been running Samba4 on a Ubuntu 12.10 for a few months. Using this setup script, I have also been using PBIS (Open-wise 7.1) to connect Linux clients to it. I have has this setup for serveral months. Now if I connect to a windows computer I get access denied and it still works on linux via PBIS. If I login to the windows computer with a local account, I can

Of course I can switch, I know, by brute force : just install CentOS over top of Fedora. But that would require a tedious day (of manually re-tweaking panels, adding & removing software, etc. ad nauseam, *and* transferring a backup copy of my data back onto the machine) -- which I'd prefer to avoid. What I want to do, if I can, is emulate the upgrades I've been doing with each

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:40PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Try running 'samba-tool testparm' and fix any errors it flags up. Is "samba-tool' a ubuntu Samba thing? With Fedora Samba versions 3.5 and 4.5, it does not exist. The 'testparm' most certainly does and I agree with using it. I just recently set up my new Fedora 25 box and used it after

Hello, I am performing alias analysis toward the following simple code: struct MyStruct { int * f1; int * f2; }; void NOALIAS(void* p, void* q){ } int main() { struct MyStruct s[2]; int a,b; s[0].f1 = &a; s[1].f1 = &b; NOALIAS(s[a].f1, s[b].f2); return 0; } When I use the following command to generate .bc code and conduct alias analysis: clang -c -emit-llvm t.c -O2 opt -basicaa

I was wondering if there is any way from either the virsh CLI or the libvirt API (preferably virsh) to get the amount of disk space to get the amount of disk space each guest has been assigned?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20110104/c21c262f/attachment.htm>

I thought I would try btrfs on a new installation of f14. yes, I know its experimental but stable so it seemed to be a good time to try it. I am not sure if I have missed something out of all my searching but am I correct in thinking that currently: I. it is not possible to boot from a snapshot of the operating system and, in particular, the yum snapshots cannot be used for