similar to: xend-config.sxp

Hi, If one sets xend to use network-bridge and there are no bridges already present then it seems that xend will clone eth0 to peth0, create xenbr0 and add peth0 and vif0.0 as ports on that bridge. If on the other hand xenbr0 is created in /etc/network/interfaces then xend will not do any of that peth0 stuff, nor will it add vif0.0 to xenbr0, yet (barring some changes in iptables rules) things

Hi all, Does anyone know what the correct steps are to add a XEN bridge, let''s say xenbr0 to Debian Squeeze? I have added the following to /etc/network/interfaces # XEN Bridge auto xenbr0 iface xenbr0 inet manual bridge ports eth0 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 And then rebooted the server but brctl show still shows eth0 as bridge: newusaxen:~# brctl

Hi, I have a strange problem with my networking setup. I read all forums around the world where people had similar problems, but couldn''t find a solution. I have an Attansic L1 gigeth chip on my mainboard. This chip works OK in stock Ubuntu Gutsy (development) 2.6.22-9-generic kernel. When I boot into Xen, and after the bridge is created, the network stops working. Some info: - If I

It seems that with their specific Xen packages, Debian likes to go against the norm, and rather than calling the Xen bridging device something sensible like "xenbr0", they rename the main physical ethernet device "eth0" to "peth0" and create "eth0" as the Xen bridge (as far as I can tell, anyways). Anyone know where exactly they do this so I can reverse it?

I have seen those documents, I did not see anything that indicates how _automatic_ bridge configuration could be enabled with xl. For my specific set up I have two bridges (xenbr0 -> peth0 & xenbr1 -> peth1). If I have to configure this manually with ifcfg scripts I will, but if an automatic method is provided or is possible with xl I'd prefer to use that. -Gene On Thu, Jan 29,

I installed 64-bit xen 3.1.0 (from xensource.com tarballs) on three new machines today, using a configuration setup that I''ve used successfully many times before. However, I encountered a new problem. These are Dell Poweredge 1950 servers, by the way. >From lspci 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12) 08:00.0 Ethernet

Hello. I''ve just started with Xen and configuring Dom0. My hardware is Core2Duo based Xeon server and I installed Debian etch for amd64 architecture. The Xen related pachages installed are the following. linux-image-2.6.17-2-xen-amd64 linux-modules-2.6.17-2-xen-amd64 xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-amd64 xen-tools xen-utils-3.0.3-1 xen-utils-common My problem is that when xend is

So Working on CEntOS 5 I am trying to sett up Xen with 2 bridges, one that connects dom0 and most of the domU to the physical card and the out to the network. Got that figured out no problem, now i want to have a second bridge that runs a local network for all the doms that doesn''t connect to the network. With code I have found used in multiple places I can easily get 2 bridges, and

Hey, I was originally asking questions on xen-users but no one seems to have any idea about this so I figured I''d try this list. I compiled Xen from source (3.2 testing) on an Intel machine running Fedora Core 8 and have discovered that my guest (Windows Vista) does not have a network connection. Looking at various online documentation and a machine that does work, I guessed that I

Hello Everyone, I have set up a xen server with 10 physical network devices using the bridge mode of XEN. This is because I want to split and separate the network traffic for security reasons. Maybe the best way is to use pci back hide. But I want to understand what is going on here. For all testings I have only activated eth[0-3]. My first tests were successful. I have created a VM using

Hello, I am trying to run Xen 3 on FC5, but I cannot have the eth0 interface appear in domU. I have 3 servers running FC3 and Xen 2 with various domUs since a year. Everything is fine on that front. I took one of the server, upgraded it to FC5 and did the following: - yum install xen kernel-xen0 kernel-xenU - grub.conf contains title Fedora Core (2.6.15-1.2054_FC5xen0 root (hd0,0) kernel

HI, I am trying to install xen through yum. Here is what I did. [root@localhost Kishore]# yum install kernel-xen xen Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.31.9-174.fc12 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31.9-174.fc12 for package: kernel-2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64

I am writing this email in the hopes of getting some advice from Xen users. My main concern is performance and stability. Before I get any further, let me explain the environment: 1. I am using redhat enterprise linux 5 with the xen kernel (2.6.18-8.1.1.el5xen). This is on a Sun X4200 with two dual core AMD processors, 16Gb of RAM, a Sun StoredgeTek 3320 attached to the X4200,

I normally use the network-script parameter in the '/etc/xen/xend-config.sxp' configuration file to configure network bridges. However, the latest release of Xen4CentOS (which comes with Xen 4.4.1) has xend disabled by default. Can I continue to use network-script without xend? If not what is the recommended method for automatically configuring network bridges with the latest release of

Hi, I ''ve got a CentOS 5.2 server running xen 3.0 with 2 DomUs also running CentOS 5.2. All my boxes are up-to date. I''m experiencing trouble with networking. Dom0 can reach the outside world when no DomU are started. It can also reach the outside world when only one DomU is running. The troubles begin when I start the second DomU. At first, this new DomU, called DomU2,

Hi, I try to get networking running with xen 3.2, but it seems I fail miserably. I am on sles10sp1, with xen 3.2.0, and kernel rpm''s installed from SP2. I configured in /etc/sysconfig/network the NETWORK_LIST: NETWORK_LIST="bridge,0,default,00:DE:AD:BE:EF,192.168.8.13/24,dhcp-off" but an ifconfig xenbr0 still shows the mac address of peth0 fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff. Initially, I

Hi, I''m using Xen 3.0.3 on two servers with Debian Etch (amd64). These servers have 10 nics (2 onboard and 8 in two 4-port cards) so that every vm can have its own interface. This worked so far with the Xen Version from Etch with a wrapper script wich started 10 bridges at boot time. But now I''ve updated Xen on one of these server to Xen 3.2.0 from backports.org and now the

Hello ! I yesterday updated one server to XEN 3.2 which was running 3.1.2 before. The default bridge setup stopped working (Guests network packets were not forwarded to physical ethernet connection on eth0) My bridge setup looked like this: root@quadxeon2:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth0 8000.003048359fc0 no

I''m using xen-3.0.3-64.el5_2.1 on centos 5.2. When I installed centos 5.2 at first time, I could see shared physical device (xenbr0). but after updating virtualization package by yum, it disappeared... connection.py is patched at centos 5.2 release time. so I can''t find out what''s wrong.... bridge configuration is below and it''s normal state.

Hi, I've been using CentOS & Xen on a server that has 2 VM's configured. The default configuration includes one physical iface that is propagated (by a default bridge) to the VM's. Since I wanted to configure additional physical iface, define a new bridge and propagate it to the viface-s of the VM's, i configured the bridge/phys. iface and brought it up (here are