similar to: SOAP responses blowing up memory usage

Hi all - I have a Player model. The database looks like this: +-------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | fname |

I am experiencing a similar problem, not with gSOAP, but with Apache''s SOAP library. Just like Guido, XML-RPC works perfectly, but the SOAP request processing fails during protocol discovery. Rail''s SOAP client also works perfectly, so I''m fairly certain the error is not in my code. I am new to both ActionWebService and the Ruby XMLRPC module, so I''m

Can someone shed some light on how to convert an Exception to a SOAPFault on Rails 1.0/AWS 1.0? I''ve been digging through the source code and see that in soap_protocol.rb there is a method called encode_response() that seems to perform the translation of an Exception to a SOAPFault. However, if I use the following code block within my Web Service controller: def

Hi *, I need to pass a hash to a webservice, so I defined my API with: api_method :search, :expects => [{ :tags => :string, :assignment => :string, :resource => :string, :lesson_plan => :string, :subject => :string, :all_types => :string }], :returns => [[Resource]] when I try to test the webservice with scaffold the

I am working on building a prototype for a Rails Web Service that will be used potentially by non-ruby/rails languages. When testing using the *invoke* scaffold I have no problem getting the correct result, however when using a 3rd party PHP client I get a *NoMethodError (undefined method `collect'' for #<SOAP::SOAPNil:0x24ea1bc>):* exception from the rails Webrick web server.

Quick question: Given a basic plugin... how can I access an object that I instantiated in the acts_as method from an instance method? Probably some sort of accessor... but where? def self.included(base) base.extend ClassMethods end module ClassMethods def acts_as_test object = Object.new ## This object needs to be accessible from the Instance Methods end include

Hi plugin-authors. So this is a little bit of take two on this question, but why can''t I access a singleton on the model calling my plugin? The crux of the full plugin below is: #logger.info self.class.to_s new_copy = self.class.new( @copyable_attributes ) the logger spits out "Datatype", but I get an error from rails saying: undefined method `datatype'' for

Hi, Just wondering when one would use "include" over "extend"? Both seem to bring in methods to the class no? The context is I''m just trying to understand why both are used with the acts_as_audited plugin: Full extract from plugin (used within here): ================================================== # Copyright (c) 2006 Brandon Keepers # # Permission is hereby

Hello there, I''m currently building a plugin, for which I need a before_save callback. The method I want to call is in module InstanceMethods, but when I add a before_save foo, foo, as defined as an InstanceMethod, never gets called. This is the first plugin I''m building, after only two weeks of fiddling with Ruby and Rails, so if anyone is kind enough to help me out.... :)

I''m working with an ActionWebService client talking to an ActionWebService server through one of DataPower''s XS40 XML Security Gateways. One of the intrinsic functions of this gateway is automatic SOAP schema validation. When testing some failure cases, I noticed that SOAP Faults returned by ActionWebService aren''t schema valid to the SOAP 1.1 schema, specifically:

I am trying to write a plugin, ''acts_as_commentable'', for my models - Image, Book, Music and so on, I do not want to use polymorphic association, so very model should have its own comment class. Here is my code acts_as_commentable.rb module Commentable def self.included(base) base.extend(ClassMethods) end module ClassMethods def

Working with modules to group certain methods. Currently I have this set up and it works: **# app/models/a.rb** class A has_history end **# lib/history.rb** module History module Model def self.included(base) base.send :extend, ClassMethods end module ClassMethods def has_history(options = {}) send :include,

I have a real problem with the acts_as_paranoid plugin. The find-scope nesting does not seem to work at all. The description: I made a copy of ''acts_as_paranoid'' in the plugin directory, renamed it to ''acts_as_very_new''(just nonsense plugin for testing), and just simplified the code: #-------------------------------------------------------------- module

I have a real problem with the acts_as_paranoid plugin. The aliasing of find and so the nested scope does not seem to work at all, when combining it with similar plugins. The description: I made a copy of ''acts_as_paranoid'' in the plugin directory, renamed it to ''acts_as_very_new''(just a nonsense plugin for testing), and simplified the code (original code

I''m working on a plug-in which has to manipulate some session varibles Unfortunately I end up with "Symbol as array index" errors. Probably the error occurs in a point that I never think about but here''s an abstract plug-in which generates the same error. It fails in the line of assignment "session[:aaa_uid] = uid" with "Symbol as array index"

hey folks I''ve installed the plugin acts_as_taggable_on_steroids (henceforth aatos), and i already have some tagging functionality set up, using the same approach (ie a Tag and a Tagging class with associated tables) as aatos. So, i want my existing Tag and Taggings methods, plus some other methods i have in a module which i include with the taggable classes (ie the ones that would call

I have an odd error. I have the following module: module ActionController module SslSupport def self.included(base) raise "#{base} does not define url_for" unless base.method_defined?(:url_for) unless base.respond_to?(:url_for_without_ssl_supprt) base.send :include, InstanceMethods base.send :alias_method_chain, :url_for, :ssl_support end

Dear list, I am trying to override an after_save callback declared in main app using plugin. The main model class is: class WorkHours < ActiveRecord::Base @after_save_call_back_called=0 after_save :after_save_call_back def after_save_call_back logger.debug "after save called" @after_save_call_back_called=1 end end And in my plugin (in the lib directory) : module

Hello, I''m completely new to Rspec testing and I''m finding it very difficult to mock specific objects. In this test, I have a before block setup as such: [code] before do setup_controller_for_warden controller.session[:operation_id] = 1 @operator = Factory :operator sign_in :operator, @operator @persist_herd = Herd.new

Hi, I''m a bit puzzled with "get" in controller specs. When I write, it "should render index template" do get :index response.should render_template(:index) end Which "get" method is being used? I checked RDoc of RSpec and RSpec on Rails, but didn''t find "get". In Rails RDoc, I found the following "get"s. get