similar to: No power down with pv_ops

Hey! As I''ve already written about two days ago, I''m having major trouble getting blktap2 to work properly. After trying xen-sources-2.6.32-xen-r1 from Gentoo (where Andrew Lyon, the maintainer, has already confirmed that he''s hitting the same problem as me, i.e. the blktap2 driver is dysfunctional in the kernel), I decided to give a pv_ops-Kernel a try, and checked out

Hello, I seem to be having some troubles regarding the latest 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.32.9 Xen dom0 pv_ops trees. Our platform: -Xen 3.4.3-rc3 (also tried 3.4.2 on 2.6.31.6 pv_ops dom0) -2.6.32.9 pv_ops dom0 kernel, perhaps a week old checkout from xen/stable git (can provide changeset if requested). -100+ domU''s, all PV. Ever since we switched to a pv_ops dom0 kernel (we were using 2.6.26

Hello, my server has massive problems with my NIC. I got: "Detected Tx Unit Hang". At the moment I use 2.6.31 from Jeremy, does anyone know if it''s fixed in 2.6.32 or newer tree? Regards, Stefan Kuhne _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hello, i''ve a xen-4.0.0-rc1 with 2.6.31.6 pv_ops. Dom0 seams to work fine. But i can only boot "old" domU kernel. A pv_ops Kernel hangs after initrd. Regards, Stefan Kuhne _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hello, i''ve a xen-4.0.0-rc1 with 2.6.31.6 pv_ops. Dom0 seams to work fine. But i can only boot "old" domU kernel. A pv_ops Kernel hangs after initrd. Regards, Stefan Kuhne _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hey! I''m deploying a vanilla Xen 4.1.2 installation at a hosting provider, and I''m experiencing hard hangs (i.e., the system is unresponsive to keystrokes, network is off, I/O to disk is stopped) on several of their available server packages, all based on Intel i7 CPUs and related chipsets. The failure does not seem related to a specific Xen-version (I''ve

Hi, is there a memory limit for Linux pv_ops domU ? On my Dom0 (2.6.31.6-dae-dom0-00751-g60e0545 / Xen 3.4.2-2) I have a guest setup with 15600MB, when I start it, Linux (2.6.32.8) see only 8GB : Feb 17 07:31:04 pacman kernel: [ 0.000000] Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 2066366 On Dom0, I have CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=32 If I do a "xm

Hi, I have several servers Supermicro - running Xen 3.4.1 @ debian 5.0 x64 running without any issues for more than year. Now I bought new server with exactly same config and installed Ubuntu 10.04 x64 - Xen 4.0.1-rc4 - 2.6.32.16 pv_ops - base Ubuntu 10.04 install boot without issues - Xen 4.0.1-rc4 compiled and installed withou any problems - 2.6.32.16 pv_ops dom0 kernel with custom config.

I'm looking at adding Xen SMP support, so I'm trying to work out what pv_ops we need, and how to cut into the existing smp stuff. smpboot.c has a mixture of stuff which is generally useful for SMP stuff (the various CPU sets, and presumably the sibling relationships are useful in principle), but also a whole pile of APIC stuff which is irrelevent to Xen. It has these exported

I'm looking at adding Xen SMP support, so I'm trying to work out what pv_ops we need, and how to cut into the existing smp stuff. smpboot.c has a mixture of stuff which is generally useful for SMP stuff (the various CPU sets, and presumably the sibling relationships are useful in principle), but also a whole pile of APIC stuff which is irrelevent to Xen. It has these exported

Hi all, I've been looking at the next steps to try to get Xen running fully on top of pv_ops. To that end, I've (just) started looking at one of the next major jobs --- i686 dom0 on pv_ops. There are still a number of things needing done to reach parity with xen-unstable: x86_64 xen on pv_ops Paravirt framebuffer/keyboard CPU hotplug Balloon kexec driver domains but it

Hi all, I've been looking at the next steps to try to get Xen running fully on top of pv_ops. To that end, I've (just) started looking at one of the next major jobs --- i686 dom0 on pv_ops. There are still a number of things needing done to reach parity with xen-unstable: x86_64 xen on pv_ops Paravirt framebuffer/keyboard CPU hotplug Balloon kexec driver domains but it

Hi all, I've been looking at the next steps to try to get Xen running fully on top of pv_ops. To that end, I've (just) started looking at one of the next major jobs --- i686 dom0 on pv_ops. There are still a number of things needing done to reach parity with xen-unstable: x86_64 xen on pv_ops Paravirt framebuffer/keyboard CPU hotplug Balloon kexec driver domains but it

Is there a version of the pv_ops kernel that will do HVM and work with fc11? I have been failing miserably trying to get it to work. I have followed Boris''s guide at: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ But have had no success so far. I am wanting to know what is the version of the pv_ops

Good afternoon everyone, I''m trying to compile the xen 2.6.32.x pv_ops kernel on centos 5.5 with i386 quad core xeon system (HP DL380 G3). Having some issues during the kernel compile one of which related to intel agp so I just removed it from .config and didn''t come across it again. This error here has got me stumped though: drivers/built-in.o: In function

Hi, I recently tried to use the newly released mod_rails (www.modrails.com) for Apache, and discovered it doesn't work on FreeBSD 7. It does however work on FreeBSD 6 just fine. I tracked it down to sendmsg() as detailed here: http://code.google.com/p/phusion-passenger/issues/detail?id=16 The mod_rails/passenger unit tests fail on FD passing, as do the Ruby 1.8.6 standard unit

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

Hello Rowland, Am 23.08.2019 13:12, schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > Do not bother, I take it you missed that red-hat (who produces sssd) > no longer supports using sssd with Winbind. So your cure is obvious: > apt-get purge sssd as I'm not using sssd and winbind for the same authentication domain (rather, winbind is for a windows domain, sssd for an LDAP-based authentication

Hi, can i get a X-Server running in DomU? I only need a X-Terminal remote for work. Regards, Stefan Kuhne _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users