similar to: GPLPV: XenNet Full on send - required = 3, available = 0

With GPLPV under 2.6.30, GPLPV gets the following from the ring: ring slot n (first buffer): status (length) = 54 bytes offset = 0 flags = NETRXF_extra_info (possibly csum too but not relevant) ring slot n + 1 (extra info) gso.size (mss) = 1460 Because NETRXF_extra_info is not set, that''s all I get for that packet. In the IP header though, the total length is 1544 (which in itself

With GPLPV under 2.6.30, GPLPV gets the following from the ring: ring slot n (first buffer): status (length) = 54 bytes offset = 0 flags = NETRXF_extra_info (possibly csum too but not relevant) ring slot n + 1 (extra info) gso.size (mss) = 1460 Because NETRXF_extra_info is not set, that''s all I get for that packet. In the IP header though, the total length is 1544 (which in itself

I have some real problems with the xennet, when disable and try to enable the nic I get a BSoD due to ndis.sys Further more the system still fails to get an IP using dhcp. The box is after a lot of cleanup, now on the 217 GPLPV. I could provide additional details on demand next week. (I''m unsure to get the machine earlier in my reach due to an on site power outage) thx, Florian

Hello, I installed the signed drivers from http://wiki.univention.de/index.php?title=Installing-signed-GPLPV-drivers and I ran into a BSOD on a Windows 2008 Server R2 Enterprise domU with a large number of vcpu''s. The BSOD is related to xennet.sys. After some trials I found that it runs fine up to 15 cores. From 16 or more, the BSOD kicks in when booting the domU. The hardware (4 times

Hi there. I have been dealing with a conundrum off and on with a VPS of mine. Windows 2003 Standard 32 bit on a Xen HVM instance. Been trying to get the GPLPV drivers working to help boost performance but always seem to run into one major issue: The PV network device looks like it works but actual connectivity is non-existant. Everything else in the GPLPV driver suite works fine. What I want to

Hi, I am at a complete loss of ideas here: I have a - xen3.3.1 hypervisor compiled from source with - dom0 being 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 kernel from debian/lenny repository with - windows 2008 64bit as hvm guest. I use the gplpv drivers 0.10.0.69 from James Harper. The included files (xenpci.sys and xennet.sys) are apparently test-signed, so applying test-signing as boot option does enable

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:28 PM, James Harper <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au> wrote: > I''ve just uploaded 0.9.8 to http://www.meadowcourt.org/downloads > > As a reminder, the wiki page is > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenWindowsGplPv > > This release fixes a bug which could be hit under high disk load (high > number of outstanding requests with fragmented

Hey guys, I''m trying to get a gentoo dom0 running on some new Nehalem boxes. Our dozen or so existing servers run a xenified 2.6.21, but we can''t get the new Intel network chipset working with it. So, I''m giving a pv_ops dom0 from xen-tip/master a go, and Xen 3.4.1 to go with it. rebase/master is a bit too bleeding edge for me. So far, it''s working great.

I have installed the 210 gplpv (debug), when I try to update them with current gplpv I get a BSOD even so when I try to uninstall them. Now I have made a bootentry that specifies NOGPLPV, what gives me a bootable system after such a crash, I found (uninstalling the leftover driver packages after getting bsod during uninstall of the main package) that uninstalling the net driver leads to bsod. Now

I''m using W2K2 32bit on a 3.2.1 Lenny-amd64 host. While the pv disk driver works as expected, I encounter problems with the network driver. I tried several installation scenarios, all with the same result. My test looks like this: I install gplpv, but without letting the networking driver install. After reboot I RTL8139 ist still active and working, and gplpv devices manage the disks.

Hi all, when I try to build an initial ramdisk with the option --with=xennet, I get the following error No module xennet found for kernel 2.6.18.8-xen I looked at the /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-xen/kernel/drivers/xen and there is no xennet module over there, which causes the problem. How can I get the xennet module? Thanks, Luca _______________________________________________ Xen-users

Hello James, I am doing quite rigorous torture tests with Xen and GPLPV. Let me first repeat the test setup: Use Xen 4.1.1 and kernel 2.6.32.36 (commit ae333e9). Configure 2 HVMs called VM1 and VM2 as follows (per HVM): 2 VCPUs, 2 virtual disks, 1024 MB RAM, viridian=1 Install Windows 2008 R2 SP1, do install everything twice - never clone. Install GPLPV, iometer 2006.07.27, prime95 26.6 x64,

I''ve just uploaded a prerelease of 0.9.9 to http://www.meadowcourt.org/downloads/ Please read the following before using: It fixes a few disk related bugs... I''ve just been testing it on a Windows Small Business Server 2003 R2 I have just restored from tape into a DomU from a backup of a physical system and it''s working fine - 0.9.8 BSOD''d almost immediately

I''ve just uploaded a prerelease of 0.9.9 to http://www.meadowcourt.org/downloads/ Please read the following before using: It fixes a few disk related bugs... I''ve just been testing it on a Windows Small Business Server 2003 R2 I have just restored from tape into a DomU from a backup of a physical system and it''s working fine - 0.9.8 BSOD''d almost immediately

Hi List, I''d compiled Xen-3.0.3-testing (changeset 11740) on Suse 10.0 Enterprise Server. The compilation succeeded without any errors but the mkinitrd command fails(???) The initrd is being created but when loading the xen kernel, I get the following message repeatedly: "azx_get_reponse() timeout" after pressing ^c the computer continue to run... Then, when I start a gnome

Updates commit 7eb219d1938968c4d6bffda038aaace936f7efbf. --- v2v/linux_kernels.ml | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/v2v/linux_kernels.ml b/v2v/linux_kernels.ml index 2efd070a6..9fbc43b60 100644 --- a/v2v/linux_kernels.ml +++ b/v2v/linux_kernels.ml @@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ let detect_kernels (g : G.guestfs) inspect family bootloader = List.mem what

I guess I have stumbled upon a bug in gplpv drivers. If you try to re-enable an nic adapter after disabling it, it just hides out of blue. And you have to reboot. Latest version of gplpv drivers and Windows 2008 R2 here. Anyone else noticed the same issue? I wonder if this is related to hot-plugging something like

Hi James Harper and others, I seen that problem already discussed early, but maybe it help you make hiding qemu devices when install gplpv driver. For now, when install gplpv i has not working qemu disk driver (gplpv works) and not working gplpv network (i think i can disable realtek network card and then gplpv will work). When you discuss German and French windows versions - you ask about

Hi, Do the gplpv drivers work with stubdom? I''ve tried to get them working and posted to the mailing list for help but the only reply I got was a suggestion to use config settings which appear to allow the gplpv drivers to access the hd at the same time as the stubdom, which might work but isnt what I was after, have I misunderstood stubdom and there is no advantage to using gplpv

ok thanks for your answer so quickly !! Cheers Rémi ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Harper" <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au> To: "Rémi BERNIER" <R.BERNIER@grelier.com>; <xen-users@lists.xensource.com> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:49 AM Subject: RE: [Xen-users] How to hide Realtek card with GPLPV 0.10.0.130 > > Hi everyone, >