similar to: strange ethtool output in xen environment

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

This is my install profile F11.install name="FC11-G1S2" memory=500 disk = [''phy:/dev/sda3,0,w'' ] vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'' ] vfb = [ ''type=vnc,vncunused=1''] kernel = "/etc/xen/vm/vmlinuz.1" ramdisk = "/etc/xen/vm/initrd.img.1" vcpus=1 on_reboot = ''restart'' on_crash = ''restart''

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Fasiha Ashraf --- On Sat, 22/8/09, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] my bootlog To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 11:12 AM Please check what wrong here grub.conf        title Fedora (2.6.30-rc6-tip)         root (hd0,6)         kernel

I have set-up xen on my Intel quad core server. Now running different experiment to measure network throughput in virtualized environment. these are some of the results: Netperf-4.5 results for inter-domain communication. Sr.No.              Client               Server               Time(sec)        Throughput(Mbps)    1                   Guest-1              Dom0                   

Hi, These are my make menuconfig screen shots. I haven''t found any xen option in v2.6.30-rc. Why is that so? this happens with most of the version. What should I do? should I just let it as it is an run the make command to build the kernel? Regards, Fasiha Ashraf See the Web''s breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! Buzz. Love Cricket?

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

hi all, When i tried to install debian as a new guest VM in paravirtualized mode on Xen the following error occurs. please help me to resolve the problem.. Unable to complete install ''<type ''exceptions.ValueError''> Invalid install location: Opening URL http://172.16.0.31:8088/debian1 failed.. Traceback (most recent call last):   File

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

I have the xensource 3.1.0 x86_64 tarball installed over a RHEL5 clone distribution. The "ethtool" utility only returns the following information: [root@fermigrid5 etc]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Link detected: yes [root@fermigrid5 etc]# Since I have no vanilla-installed rhel5 machines with which to compare, I am not sure if I am dealing with a bug in the ethtool (whose

Hi Is there anyone who has successfully resolved the low throughput problem in Guest communication. I am using Xen3.4.1 with PV os kernel 2.6.30-rc6-tip On fedora11. While running netperf benchmark on guests throughput results are very low DomU to DomU    0.29 Mbps Why is it so? What would be the problem. Is there any issue with fc11 platform? Regards, Fasiha Ashraf Add whatever you love

I have compiled xen3.4.1 with 2.6.31-rc kernel on the same fedora11 64bit platform. i just want to install the recent version of Fedora’s libvirt so that my virt-manager and virt-install work properly for paravirt domains installs. for this i am following the link below http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ Do i need to install xen

I have compiled xen3.4.1 with 2.6.31-rc kernel on the same fedora11 64bit platform. i just want to install the recent version of Fedora’s libvirt so that my virt-manager and virt-install work properly for paravirt domains installs. for this i am following the link below http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ Do i need to install xen

Hi There, I''ve installed xen 3 and xen-tools on my Debian etch server and all seems well, until I try to start a guest domain. debian:/home/xen# xm create /etc/xen/D4G3.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/D4G3.cfg". Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not found. I get the error: "Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device

Hi! Maybe, I found a bug of xen. My system: - domain0 - gentoo - xen-devel-3.0, kernel 2.6.12.5-r1 - domain1 - debian - kernel 2.6.12.5-r1 (2 interface: vif1.1 = eth0 (0.0.0.0), vif1.2 = eth1 (10.0.1.1 + gw 10.0.1.2)) Bridge: xen-br0 (config as 10.0.1.2) include (vif1.2, vif0.0) xen-br1 (config as 0.0.0.0) include (vif1.1, peth0) On server domain1 I use a pppoe server. If a send a pppoe request

Does xen virtualize wireless networks, and if not, why not? What is so difficult about it? Regards! Fasiha Ashraf Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users