similar to: xend config file

Fasiha Ashraf --- On Sat, 22/8/09, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] my bootlog To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 11:12 AM Please check what wrong here grub.conf        title Fedora (2.6.30-rc6-tip)         root (hd0,6)         kernel

This is my install profile F11.install name="FC11-G1S2" memory=500 disk = [''phy:/dev/sda3,0,w'' ] vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'' ] vfb = [ ''type=vnc,vncunused=1''] kernel = "/etc/xen/vm/vmlinuz.1" ramdisk = "/etc/xen/vm/initrd.img.1" vcpus=1 on_reboot = ''restart'' on_crash = ''restart''

An error displayed while running virt-manager or virt-install [root@HPCNL-SR-2 init.d]# virt-install ERROR    unable to connect to ''localhost:8000'': Connection refused Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/sbin/virt-install", line 780, in <module>     main()   File "/usr/sbin/virt-install", line 530, in main     conn =

hi all, When i tried to install debian as a new guest VM in paravirtualized mode on Xen the following error occurs. please help me to resolve the problem.. Unable to complete install ''<type ''exceptions.ValueError''> Invalid install location: Opening URL http://172.16.0.31:8088/debian1 failed.. Traceback (most recent call last):   File

I have set-up xen on my Intel quad core server. Now running different experiment to measure network throughput in virtualized environment. these are some of the results: Netperf-4.5 results for inter-domain communication. Sr.No.              Client               Server               Time(sec)        Throughput(Mbps)    1                   Guest-1              Dom0                   

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Comparing my last know working configuration with the current one, it appears to be gagging on the new localhost\.localdomain that is in the configuration file. I don''t know if this got added by my machine when compiling. diff -ur xen-3.0-testing.hg/install/etc/xen/xend-config.sxp xen-unstable.hg/install/etc/xen/xend-config.sxp --- xen-3.0-testing.hg/install/etc/xen/xend-config.sxp

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi There, I''ve installed xen 3 and xen-tools on my Debian etch server and all seems well, until I try to start a guest domain. debian:/home/xen# xm create /etc/xen/D4G3.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/D4G3.cfg". Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not found. I get the error: "Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device

I have compiled xen3.4.1 with 2.6.31-rc kernel on the same fedora11 64bit platform. i just want to install the recent version of Fedora’s libvirt so that my virt-manager and virt-install work properly for paravirt domains installs. for this i am following the link below http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ Do i need to install xen

I have compiled xen3.4.1 with 2.6.31-rc kernel on the same fedora11 64bit platform. i just want to install the recent version of Fedora’s libvirt so that my virt-manager and virt-install work properly for paravirt domains installs. for this i am following the link below http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ Do i need to install xen

Hi Is there anyone who has successfully resolved the low throughput problem in Guest communication. I am using Xen3.4.1 with PV os kernel 2.6.30-rc6-tip On fedora11. While running netperf benchmark on guests throughput results are very low DomU to DomU    0.29 Mbps Why is it so? What would be the problem. Is there any issue with fc11 platform? Regards, Fasiha Ashraf Add whatever you love

I have 4 guest VMs installed on 1 host. One of them is Vyatta (VC5). Currently we are using default Xen-bridge for communication between VMs(inter-domain or intra-domain). I want to assign Vyatta(a guest VM) exclusively to replace Xen-bridging for VM to VM communication. Means the traffic sent from guest-1 to guest-2 bypass briging and route through vyatta(VM), instead of going to Dom0. As

# HG changeset patch # User Lutz.Dube # Node ID ca2c8c262dbaa6b2521cec60af7cd688dabdf850 # Parent 8992134dcfd0b9e1e86f4111e68a8aa48bd33c3c Values of cpu_weight and cpu_cap are lost after xend restart For managed domains in state ''halted'' I always get default values for cpu_cap / cpu_weight after xend restart. This is because the names of parameters differ between a SXP file to

> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:40 PM, rgritzo <rgritzo at gmail.com <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt>> wrote: > > so i guess i was not paying too close attention and upgraded to xen 4.6.1 before i migrated my domU configurations to libxl :{ > > Just FYI, as a fall-back you can always move yourself to the Xen 4.4 "track" by: > 1.