similar to: cannot boot PV guest

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

I have set-up xen on my Intel quad core server. Now running different experiment to measure network throughput in virtualized environment. these are some of the results: Netperf-4.5 results for inter-domain communication. Sr.No.              Client               Server               Time(sec)        Throughput(Mbps)    1                   Guest-1              Dom0                   

Fasiha Ashraf --- On Sat, 22/8/09, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] my bootlog To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 11:12 AM Please check what wrong here grub.conf        title Fedora (2.6.30-rc6-tip)         root (hd0,6)         kernel

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi Is there anyone who has successfully resolved the low throughput problem in Guest communication. I am using Xen3.4.1 with PV os kernel 2.6.30-rc6-tip On fedora11. While running netperf benchmark on guests throughput results are very low DomU to DomU    0.29 Mbps Why is it so? What would be the problem. Is there any issue with fc11 platform? Regards, Fasiha Ashraf Add whatever you love

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

hi all, When i tried to install debian as a new guest VM in paravirtualized mode on Xen the following error occurs. please help me to resolve the problem.. Unable to complete install ''<type ''exceptions.ValueError''> Invalid install location: Opening URL http://172.16.0.31:8088/debian1 failed.. Traceback (most recent call last):   File

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

Hi, These are my make menuconfig screen shots. I haven''t found any xen option in v2.6.30-rc. Why is that so? this happens with most of the version. What should I do? should I just let it as it is an run the make command to build the kernel? Regards, Fasiha Ashraf See the Web''s breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! Buzz. Love Cricket?

I have 4 guest VMs installed on 1 host. One of them is Vyatta (VC5). Currently we are using default Xen-bridge for communication between VMs(inter-domain or intra-domain). I want to assign Vyatta(a guest VM) exclusively to replace Xen-bridging for VM to VM communication. Means the traffic sent from guest-1 to guest-2 bypass briging and route through vyatta(VM), instead of going to Dom0. As

Hi There, I''ve installed xen 3 and xen-tools on my Debian etch server and all seems well, until I try to start a guest domain. debian:/home/xen# xm create /etc/xen/D4G3.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/D4G3.cfg". Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not found. I get the error: "Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device

An error displayed while running virt-manager or virt-install [root@HPCNL-SR-2 init.d]# virt-install ERROR    unable to connect to ''localhost:8000'': Connection refused Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/sbin/virt-install", line 780, in <module>     main()   File "/usr/sbin/virt-install", line 530, in main     conn =

I have compiled xen3.4.1 with 2.6.31-rc kernel on the same fedora11 64bit platform. i just want to install the recent version of Fedora’s libvirt so that my virt-manager and virt-install work properly for paravirt domains installs. for this i am following the link below http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ Do i need to install xen

I have compiled xen3.4.1 with 2.6.31-rc kernel on the same fedora11 64bit platform. i just want to install the recent version of Fedora’s libvirt so that my virt-manager and virt-install work properly for paravirt domains installs. for this i am following the link below http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ Do i need to install xen