similar to: Xen boot probe

Fasiha Ashraf --- On Sat, 22/8/09, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] my bootlog To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 11:12 AM Please check what wrong here grub.conf        title Fedora (2.6.30-rc6-tip)         root (hd0,6)         kernel

Hi All, I just tried to create a DomU using the following method... (I normally use the Xen install kernel when I create CentOS domus, but when I tried that with the PXE image, that had the same effect as below). This is the first time I have created a Fedora domu in ages... years, even. virt-install \ --paravirt \ --name demo \ --ram 500 \

This is my install profile F11.install name="FC11-G1S2" memory=500 disk = [''phy:/dev/sda3,0,w'' ] vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'' ] vfb = [ ''type=vnc,vncunused=1''] kernel = "/etc/xen/vm/vmlinuz.1" ramdisk = "/etc/xen/vm/initrd.img.1" vcpus=1 on_reboot = ''restart'' on_crash = ''restart''

Hello, It looks like upstream linux-2.6.git contains at least the following xen related new features for Linux 2.6.36: - Xen-SWIOTLB support (required for Xen PCI passthru and dom0) - Xen PV-on-HVM drivers - Xen VBD online dynamic resize of guest disks (xvd*) Congratulations! What are the plans for 2.6.37 merge window? I believe at least: - Xen PCI frontend Others? I''m going to

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi Is there anyone who has successfully resolved the low throughput problem in Guest communication. I am using Xen3.4.1 with PV os kernel 2.6.30-rc6-tip On fedora11. While running netperf benchmark on guests throughput results are very low DomU to DomU    0.29 Mbps Why is it so? What would be the problem. Is there any issue with fc11 platform? Regards, Fasiha Ashraf Add whatever you love

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

I have set-up xen on my Intel quad core server. Now running different experiment to measure network throughput in virtualized environment. these are some of the results: Netperf-4.5 results for inter-domain communication. Sr.No.              Client               Server               Time(sec)        Throughput(Mbps)    1                   Guest-1              Dom0                   

Thanks all for the advice. It seems there is an issue with Dracut booting from these hosts when LVM is used. dracut: Scanning devices sda2 for LVM logical volumes VolGroup/lv_swap VolGroup/lv_root dracut: inactive '/dev/VolGroup/lv_swap' [1.94 GiB] inherit dracut: inactive '/dev/VolGroup/lv_root' [230.69 GiB] inherit dracut: PARTIAL MODE. Incomplete logical volumes will be

As mentioned yesterday, Xen 4.6 packages are now available for testing. These also include an update to libvirt 1.3.0, in line with what's available for CentOS 7. Please test, particularly the upgrade if you can, and report any problems here. To upgrade: yum update --enablerepo=centos-virt-xen-testing To install from scratch: * Install centos-release-xen from centos-extras yum install

Hi all, I am trying to install OpenSUSE 11.1 as a para-virtualized DomU on an opensolaris2009.06 guest using the xvm packages provided via IPS. I followed the instructions available here: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/xen/docs/virtinstall/ but I get the following error when trying to install from a NFS share where I mounted the iso (as far as I understand the only way to get a Linux

Hi- Is it safe to use the zerofree utility on an ext4 partition inside an LVM with guestfish? I know zerofree works on ext4, but I am unsure about LVM. The info page uses the syntax "zerofree <device>", so using the info page example, could I (safely) do something like the following? $ guestfish Welcome to guestfish, the libguestfs filesystem interactive shell for

On 04/13/2016 12:02 AM, ???? wrote: > In /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit, > there's "mount -a -n -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs,gfs2i,glusterfs -O > no_netdev". > > > I have other same type servers. And on other servers with same /etc/fstsb, > file system is correct. > There's no difference between normal server's rc.sysinit and this problem > server's

hi, The problem: for kvm/qemu disks are /dev/vdx devices when using the virtio driver. For vmware, drives are /dev/sdx devices. For hp servers, /dev/ccisss/whatever (sorry, no proliant with an array controller handy to check it). in order to just have one kickstart script to maintain I am trying to use the %pre section but getting a bit stuck. This is what I have: %pre if [ -b /dev/sda ] then

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

> -----Original Message----- > From: Johnny Hughes > On 12/01/2014 04:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote: > > > > [<ffffffff81575480>] panic+0xc4/0x1e1 > > [<ffffffff81054836>] find_new_reaper+0x176/0x180 > > [<ffffffff81055345>] forget_original_parent+0x45/0x2c0 > > [<ffffffff81107214>] ? task_function_call+0x44/0x50 > >

This is a repost of the patch I sent on Friday. I know it was already ACK'd, but I've changed a fair bit in addition to adding the requested POD. Specifically: I discovered that augeas's grub lens wasn't returning cmdline the way I expected. This is fixed. The kernel package, if known, is output as a property of the kernel. The XML output of virt-inspector is updated with all