similar to: Xen 3.02 in Debian etch

hi all, When i tried to install debian as a new guest VM in paravirtualized mode on Xen the following error occurs. please help me to resolve the problem.. Unable to complete install ''<type ''exceptions.ValueError''> Invalid install location: Opening URL http://172.16.0.31:8088/debian1 failed.. Traceback (most recent call last):   File

Hi There, I''ve installed xen 3 and xen-tools on my Debian etch server and all seems well, until I try to start a guest domain. debian:/home/xen# xm create /etc/xen/D4G3.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/D4G3.cfg". Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not found. I get the error: "Error: Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device

Fasiha Ashraf --- On Sat, 22/8/09, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] my bootlog To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 11:12 AM Please check what wrong here grub.conf        title Fedora (2.6.30-rc6-tip)         root (hd0,6)         kernel

I have set-up xen on my Intel quad core server. Now running different experiment to measure network throughput in virtualized environment. these are some of the results: Netperf-4.5 results for inter-domain communication. Sr.No.              Client               Server               Time(sec)        Throughput(Mbps)    1                   Guest-1              Dom0                   

Hi, ? sip.conf is missing in /etc/asterisk after installing the package AsteriskNow 1.5 Beta release? Is there any guide for FreePbx Administration? Thanks ? Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo! India Travel http://in.travel.yahoo.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

This is my install profile F11.install name="FC11-G1S2" memory=500 disk = [''phy:/dev/sda3,0,w'' ] vif = [ ''bridge=eth0'' ] vfb = [ ''type=vnc,vncunused=1''] kernel = "/etc/xen/vm/vmlinuz.1" ramdisk = "/etc/xen/vm/initrd.img.1" vcpus=1 on_reboot = ''restart'' on_crash = ''restart''

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

I have 4 guest VMs installed on 1 host. One of them is Vyatta (VC5). Currently we are using default Xen-bridge for communication between VMs(inter-domain or intra-domain). I want to assign Vyatta(a guest VM) exclusively to replace Xen-bridging for VM to VM communication. Means the traffic sent from guest-1 to guest-2 bypass briging and route through vyatta(VM), instead of going to Dom0. As

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

Hi there, I am getting very low throughput (around 0.29Mbps) while running netperf benchmark for guest to guest communication on a single physical host. To analyse where the time is spent in hypervisor I wanna use profiling. Please help me choosing good profiler according to my requirments. Should it be better in my case, Xentrace, gprof, xenoprof  or Oprofile. Is it possible to use some vtune

I have compiled xen3.4.1 with 2.6.31-rc kernel on the same fedora11 64bit platform. i just want to install the recent version of Fedora’s libvirt so that my virt-manager and virt-install work properly for paravirt domains installs. for this i am following the link below http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ Do i need to install xen

I have compiled xen3.4.1 with 2.6.31-rc kernel on the same fedora11 64bit platform. i just want to install the recent version of Fedora’s libvirt so that my virt-manager and virt-install work properly for paravirt domains installs. for this i am following the link below http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ Do i need to install xen

Does xen virtualize wireless networks, and if not, why not? What is so difficult about it? Regards! Fasiha Ashraf Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi Is there anyone who has successfully resolved the low throughput problem in Guest communication. I am using Xen3.4.1 with PV os kernel 2.6.30-rc6-tip On fedora11. While running netperf benchmark on guests throughput results are very low DomU to DomU    0.29 Mbps Why is it so? What would be the problem. Is there any issue with fc11 platform? Regards, Fasiha Ashraf Add whatever you love

When I try to connect xen using virtmanager, the following error occurs. Unable to open connection to hypervisor URI ''xen:///'': <class ''libvirt.libvirtError''> unable to connect to ''localhost:8000'': Connection refused None How to resolve this problem in connecting xen? Regards, Fasiha Ashraf Keep up with people you care about with

When I try to connect xen using virtmanager, the following error occurs. Unable to open connection to hypervisor URI ''xen:///'': <class ''libvirt.libvirtError''> unable to connect to ''localhost:8000'': Connection refused None How to resolve this problem in connecting xen? Regards, Fasiha Ashraf Keep up with people you care about with

Hi I am facing problem in starting xend properly. Anyone please send me his/her xend-config.sxp file. So that i can find the problem in my case Regards, Fasiha Ashraf Thinking of ordering food? Find restaurant numbers on Yahoo! India Local http://in.local.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com