Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "re ceiving NMI while using a PCI card."
2010 Jun 08
0
NMI received for unknown reason
G'day,
I am testing a new server with a Supermicro X7SBA motherboard
and TE405 cards. When I load Dahdi and run dahdi_cfg I get
the following errors:
kernel: Uhhuh, NMI received for unknown reason b1 on CPU 0
You probably have a hardware problem with your RAM chips
Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
The reason codes I have seen are a0, a1, and
2004 Dec 20
7
NMI issues...
I have read thru what other users have tried in this list when they have
experienced seemingly similar issues to what I have, without success. I
suspect there might be an issue regarding both the X100P and TDM04b cards
being used in an Intel SE7525GP2 motherboard, as I had to even wait for a
BIOS update from Intel in order to utilize my 3ware 9500 SATA raid
controller on it (3ware Kb -->
2008 Oct 26
1
Upgrading to Centos 4.7 on HP DL580G5 caused problems
As part of patching a cluster which has two DL580G5 login nodes ( 4X
Intel 7300 DC cpus) & 24 HP DL160G5 compute nodes ( 2x Intel 5272 DC
cpus) we encountered an issue that I would like to record:
I upgraded both DL580s to Centos 4.7 via yum but only rebooted one
initially- this node, previously bomb-proof, started to hang randomly
with no obvious messages logged to help with diagnosis.
2009 Nov 12
5
my kernel is dazed and confused
Nov 12 08:54:27 steerpike kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason
a0 on CPU 0.
Nov 12 08:54:27 steerpike kernel: You have some hardware problem, likely
on the PCI bus.
Nov 12 08:54:27 steerpike kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
Would my Digium TDM410P cause an NMI, or is my computer failing?
- Mike
2009 Jan 19
1
Server freeze & kernel panic
Hi All
I'm having some serious kernel panic while using digium cards.
It may be related to IRQ shared.
Can this cause a lot of drop call and bad voice quality ?
Do you guys know if there is a way I can assign one IRQ for each digium card
?
Thanks a lot.
Here is the output of /var/log/syslog
kernel: [ 3821.982893] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 20.
kernel: [
2006 Sep 05
2
S-ATA drive into a domU.
Hi,
With the pcibackend feature of Xen 3.0.2, I pass a S-ATA card to
a domU. This card is recognized with the sata_uli module but not
the disk.
# lspci
0000:02:09.0 Mass storage controller: ALi Corporation ALi M5281 Serial ATA / RAID Host Controller (rev a1)
# modprobe sata_uli
sata_uli 0000:02:09.0: version 0.5
ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC800 ctl 0xC402 bmdma 0xB400 irq 16
ata4: SATA max
2010 Dec 28
5
PCIe switch that does not support or enable ACS
Hi Folks:
I am oot able to add HP Intel 4Port PCIe to a linux hvm domain. HW is a HP
DC7900.
ErrorMessage:
VmError: pci: to avoid potential security issue, 0000:22:00.0 is not allowed
to be assigned to guest since it is behind PCIe switch that does not support
or enable ACS.
I also added in /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp:
pci-passthrough-strict-check no
pci-dev-assign-strict-check no
but no
2009 Dec 10
2
poweredge 1950 hangs at starting udev
Hi all,
I have a PowerEdge 1950 that was acting weird. Network connectivity was
only performing at a quarter of what was expected (if that). Even if I
scp'd something to localhost it would perform poorly. Rather than fight
with it, I just decided to reload it. It was running 5.3, and it is now
running 5.4. However, when I go to boot it gets stuck at starting udev.
If I let it sit
2005 Mar 03
5
kernel error with Zaptel cards
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher [mailto:chris.robinson@voipsupply.com]
> I see that there is a lot of discussion on the web about a
> common error
> after installing and modprobe'ing the zaptel driver. However I don't
> see any resolution, anyone found a solution?
>
> Here's the output I get after modprobe:
>
> Uhhuh. NMI received.
2005 Aug 13
0
[Asterisk-Dev] Re: FXO PCI Master abort
Dear Zaptel and wcfxo devellopers,
Hi, so far I have had no success moving this issue forward. Carl
Andersson has been kind enough to help build various kernels to try,
but with no success.
So, I have tried to debug the problem directly. So far I have applied
the patch below to wcfxo.c. (on the latest CVS head) This makes my
system stable again (in that I dont have to keep pressing the big
2008 Feb 05
5
[Bug 14391] New: nouveau lockup on NV44 / x86_64
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391
Summary: nouveau lockup on NV44 / x86_64
Product: xorg
Version: git
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
ReportedBy: wwoods at
2005 Jan 05
7
TDM04B vs Dell
Hi all,
I've struggled for several days trying to get a Digium TDM04B 4-port
wxfco card working on a Dell 1U PowerEdge 750 machine running
Fedora Core 1. I finally got a call back from Digium who indicated that
there is a fundamental conflict between the card and the PowerEdge
having to do with PCI interrupts. Asterisk version is stable v1-0 12/29/04.
The symptoms of the problem were as
2004 Dec 11
1
modprobe wcfxo causes fc3 box to crash
Hello everybody,
After going through multiple posts on Internet and trying different
things I can't seems get zaptel wcfxo loaded on the server correctly.
I run dual P3 500 Mhz box. After reading README.udev
I put a file 60-zaptel.rules /etc/udev/rules.d
# Section for zaptel device
KERNEL="zapctl", NAME="zap/ctl"
KERNEL="zaptimer",
2004 Aug 03
5
memory error?
I have just noticed this message in my kernel logs, reporting the possibility of an error with my memory. This would go a long way towards explaining the problems i''ve been having. This particular error is occuring when i''m not running xen so is obviously not something brought on by xen itself.
The strange thing is that the NMI error is always followed by the TLAN: eth0: Adaptor
2005 May 02
4
DELL 2800 : PCI Parity error
Hi,
I am struggling to get rid of a conflict on DELL 2800 : PCI Parity error
(EB113 on the display)
I am learning linux and asterisk as I go along, there might be obvious
things I should know, but bear with me.
>From demsg below my 2 digium cards installed are listed (no config or
connections done to digium cards yet), the conflict is with the TDM400P
card, without that card, in any slot, no
2011 Aug 31
3
CPU soft lockup XEN 4.1rc
Hello,
Similar to others I have freezeups on the system, it is consistent with
high IO load. If the system runs (even with multiple) XenU it does not
happen. But I can consistently force the situation to occur.
Running 4 dd processes dumping 20GB each on a LVM/mdadm soft RAID5
volume it consistenly crashes in a DomU. Running without XEN I do not
see the problem at all - (e.g. after about 3TB of
2011 Nov 07
2
[Bug 42672] New: NMI SERR with 2 Geforce 310 cards
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42672
Bug #: 42672
Summary: NMI SERR with 2 Geforce 310 cards
Classification: Unclassified
Product: xorg
Version: 7.7 (2011)
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
2004 Mar 21
5
PRI issues with TE410P
Hi,
I am having some problems mentioned below, the box is in production live
environment with traffic around 30 - 100 calls.
I am running T/E410P in a Dual P4 xeon with HT disabled. I am using
zaptel 0.9.0 and asterisk stable 1 release. There is no gui, just mysql,
perl (small script) and asterisk.
System runs very smoothly if the calls are around 40-50 and comes one by
one , however sometimes
2008 Oct 17
0
[PATCH] NMI watchdog: use new counter on Core/Core2 CPUs
The old CPU_CLK_UNHALTED performance counter no longer runs on Core or
Core2 CPUs. Use the new CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE_P one.
Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2020 Feb 11
1
[PATCH 62/62] x86/sev-es: Add NMI state tracking
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Joerg Roedel <joro at 8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
>
> Keep NMI state in SEV-ES code so the kernel can re-enable NMIs for the
> vCPU when it reaches IRET.
This patch is overcomplicated IMO. Just do the magic incantation in C
from do_nmi or from here:
/*
* For ease of testing, unmask