similar to: Paravirtualized DomU clock stops after migrating back

Hi everyone, I generated my own DomU guest using opensuse''s yast dirinstall and stored it on a seperate iscsi target. I created it as a DomU on my Domain0 (2.6.25.16-0.1-xen kernel) successfully, using the following configuration: name = "vm01-opensuse11-base-LAMP" memory = 256 kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-xen" ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-xen" root =

I changed /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 pri.ostechnix.lan pri 51.15.90.60 sec.ostechnix.lan sec 163.172.151.120 third.ostechnix.lan third on every node matching hostname to 127.0.0.1 then root at pri:~# apt-get purge glusterfs-server root at pri:~# rm -rf /var/lib/glusterd/ root at pri:~# rm -rf /var/log/glusterfs/ root at pri:~# apt-get install glusterfs-server root at pri:~#

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20080701/3140c7d2/attachment.htm

Hello, i installed glusterfs 3.11.3 version 3 nodes ubuntu 16.04 machine. All machines have same /etc/hosts. node1 hostname pri.ostechnix.lan node2 hostname sec.ostechnix.lan node2 hostname third.ostechnix.lan 51.15.77.14 pri.ostechnix.lan pri 51.15.90.60 sec.ostechnix.lan sec 163.172.151.120 third.ostechnix.lan third volume create command is root at

I'm guessing there's something wrong w.r.t address resolution on node 1. >From the logs it's quite clear to me that node 1 is unable to resolve the address configured in /etc/hosts where as the other nodes do. Could you paste the gluster peer status output from all the nodes? Also can you please check if you're able to ping "pri.ostechnix.lan" from node1 only? Does

Did you do gluster peer probe? Check out the documentation: http://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Storage%20Pools/ On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Ercan Aydo?an <ercan.aydogan at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > i installed glusterfs 3.11.3 version 3 nodes ubuntu 16.04 machine. All > machines have same /etc/hosts. > > node1 hostname > pri.ostechnix.lan

Hello, i have dedicated 3.11.3 version glusterfs 3 nodes. i can create volumes if peer probe with hostname. But ip based probe it?s not working. What?s the correct /etc/hosts and hostname values when ip based peer probe. Do i need still need peer FQDN names on /etc/hosts . i need advice how can fix this issue. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, i attached logs. node3_cmd_history.log is empty because i did not run any command on node3. At logs i saw node 1 peer status contains ip addresses as peer. But other nodes node1 visible at it?s name . node 1 peer status is root at pri:/var/log/glusterfs# gluster peer status Number of Peers: 2 Hostname: 51.15.90.60 Uuid: eed0d6c6-90ef-4705-b3f9-0b028d769df3 State: Peer in Cluster

Hi, Could you please send me the glusterd.logs and cmd-history logs from all the nodes. Thanks Gaurav On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Ercan Aydo?an <ercan.aydogan at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > i have dedicated 3.11.3 version glusterfs 3 nodes. i can create volumes if > peer probe with hostname. > > But ip based probe it?s not working. > > What?s the correct

Hello all, I am trying to run a simulation. the simulation presented below. > rep=5 > sr=.10 # selection ratio > pmin=.10 # minority ratio > nap=1000 # total number of applicant > nsle=sr*nap # number of ee selected > nb=nap*pmin # number of minority > nw=nap-nb # number of majority > mb=100 # mean minority > sb=15 # sd minority > mw=100 # mean majority > sw=15 #

I'm using Syslinux 6.03. I'm using FONT command. I have converted cp857.08, cp857.14 and cp857.16 these are KBD Project fonts to PSF file format. My isolinux.cfg file's encoding is CP857 (Turkish VGA/DOS Font Encoding). But FONT command doesn't work. My isolinux.cfg file's content is below: FONT cp857.psf SAY ??i????????? But these characters (??i?????????) don't

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20080613/fe8f10a8/attachment.htm

When messages marked \Recent are deleted and expunged, the patch now sends the new message count and the new recent messages count (although the message count is not really necessary). >From RFC 3501 errata (ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/imap/rfc3501-errata) << Section 6.4.3, page 49: old: The EXPUNGE command permanently removes all messages that have the \Deleted flag set

>From glusterd.logs, It looks like address resolution issue in "glusterd_brickinfo_new_from_brick" functon call. After seeing command history, I could see that you have 3 nodes, and firstly you are peer probing 51.15.90.60 and 163.172.151.120 from 51.15.77.14 So here itself you have 3 node cluster, after all this you are going on node 2 and again peer probing 51.15.77.14. Ideally

Does anyone have a dmg image or .bundle of wxRuby built against wxwindows 2.4/2.5/2.6 and Ruby 1.8? I attempted to build all the parts with not much success. -- -- I am not a number I am a man! _______________________________________________ wxruby-users mailing list wxruby-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users

Hi, just to be sure: can I use TDB databases that were created on ppc64 on a x86_64 platform? thx Matthias

Hello Is it planned someday to implement additional higher (9-12) compression modes like in Flake? http://flake-enc.sourceforge.net/ It's not very important I think. Harddrive space isn't problem today. But it preserves other indepentent work done on Flac and give room for some extra albums on harddrive. I think development of flake is stopped. I plan to test my ~20 GB flac

On Oct 2, 2012, at 7:23 AM, Matthew Curtis <mcurtis at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I'm adding support for -ffixed-<reg> for Hexagon and was wondering if I should do it in such a way that other targets get the support as well by default or if a given target back-end should have to explicitly opt-in for support. It would be great to have this as a target-indepentent (well, obviously

Hi All, We have ocfs2 node cluster with oracle 11G RAC running, The node2 got crashed automatically, when i rebooted node one for maintenance. please check the log from node2 , before its got crashed. Oct 23 15:42:25 node2 kernel: ocfs2_dlm: Nodes in domain ("029C02C993E44E90879922E268FB161A"): 2 Oct 23 15:42:29 node2 kernel: ocfs2_dlm: Node 1 leaves domain

Hi, I have a question about ExtractLoop() in CodeExtractor.cpp. The sample code is a simple list traversal, as attached. The generated bitcode (from llvm-gcc -O1) is shown below. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- define i32 @walk(%struct.node2* %list2) nounwind { entry: %0 = icmp eq