Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "domU, Failed to obtain physical IRQ, e1000 Intel NIC"
2007 Aug 30
3
machine with 2 ethernet cards e1000 and forcedeth
I am using centos 5 x86_64 AMD64 X2 4200+. I am current on yum update.
My machine has two ethernet cards. e1000 (eth0) and forcedeth (eth1)
[root at fsdsigns2 ~]# more /etc/modprobe.conf
alias eth0 e1000
alias eth1 forcedeth
sometimes on boot the forcedeth driver thinks it is eth0:
[root at fsdsigns2 ~]# dmesg | grep eth
forcedeth.c: Reverse Engineered nForce ethernet driver. Version 0.60.
2008 Mar 27
0
Pci Export to get usb Dongle working under DomU (Xen 3.2)
Hello everybody,
I''m experiencing some problems while exporting a whole usb hub to my
DomU.
My Dom0 is a Debian Etch using Xen 3.2 and kernel 2.6.18-5-xen-686 SMP
on an intel core 2 duo.
My DomU is a CentOs 5.1 using same kernel.
Both are 32 bits environnements.
I''ve exported my Usb Hub, and a ethernet card, using the
pciback.hide=(04:00.0)(00:1d.0) option to Dom0 kernel.
I
2007 Dec 06
6
DomU (Centos 5) with dedicated e1000 (intel) device dropping packets
Hello everybody,
I''ve finished with pci export from DomU to Dom0 (Debian Etch) but now i
have a new problem, and a big one.
My ethernet card is dropping packets but after some time (i can''t tell
how)
It can work for a day (not in production so not hard tested) and then
all packets are dropped.
Look at the ifconfig output :
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
2005 Dec 31
1
RE: Intel Corporation 82573V Gigabit Ethernet Controller
>
> Attempting to install CentOS on a new MSI MB (MS 9618), which
> uses the subject controllers.
> There are two controllers on the board, seems as though only
> one can be used.
> I have to manually init, using ifconfig eth0, to use it.
>
> I understand that the Ethernet controller drivers are not available.
> Is there any news on this or a possible date when
2007 Nov 16
1
PCI Mapping of e1000 Dual-Port Adapter to DomU
Hello,
I´m trying to map one network interface of a Dual-Port e1000 Server
Adapter
to a DomU (firewall). In Dom0 the adaper is seen with lspci as:
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB DPT LAN
Controller Copper (rev 01)
06:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB DPT LAN
Controller Copper (rev 01)
My goal is to map only 06:00.1 to DomU so I used this
2009 Jun 18
1
intel nic vanished with 5.3
Hi
I have boxes with a quad card that shows up with
e1000 e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
However since rebuilding a box from 4.7 to 5.3 this card has vanished -
I would have thought this card is pretty generic so i dont believe there
are not drivers for it -
Any other thoughts? It does not show up at all in messages etc, and
ethtool knows nothing of it either.
thanks
2010 Dec 27
2
E1000 eth1 link flakiness - causes??
Have you experienced this? What's going on when this occurs? What do I
need to do to keep it from occurring? Please advise. Thanks.
Dec 4 10:18:17 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down
Dec 4 10:18:19 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps
Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Dec 4 10:18:21 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down
Dec 4 10:18:23 localhost kernel:
2018 May 10
0
Re: e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
On 05/10/2018 02:53 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC,
> link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is
> executed
What is your definition of "becomes ready"? Are you looking at the
output of "ip link show" in the guest? Or are you watching "brctl
2020 Jan 17
0
Centos 8 and E1000 intel driver
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:16 PM david <david at daku.org> wrote:
>
> Folks
>
> I know that support for the network adaptors supported by the 'e1000'
> driver have been removed from the base distribution. However, I have
> exactly that controller (Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet PCI, not
> PCIe). Is there a way for me to add support for that on Centos
> 8.1?
2020 Jan 18
0
Centos 8 and E1000 intel driver
At 03:27 PM 1/17/2020, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:16 PM david <david at daku.org> wrote:
> >
> > Folks
> >
> > I know that support for the network adaptors supported by the 'e1000'
> > driver have been removed from the base distribution. However, I have
> > exactly that controller (Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet PCI, not
> >
2018 Mar 23
0
Re: [PATCH] v2v: ova: convert E1000 network interfaces as such
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:35:36PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> So far v2v did not read the model of network interfaces, resulting in
> "virtio" as the model for such interfaces.
>
> Start reading the model, if available, mapping only E1000 for now.
Looks sensible, ACK.
> There are also other models, e.g. PCNet32 or VmxNet3, but they are
> ignored for now: reading
2007 Nov 09
2
Intel 1000/PRO GT (e1000 driver) and "Detect Tx Unit Hang" error with 4GB RAM
My system configuration:
ASUS M2A-VM motherboard
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 2.2 GHz
4x A-DATA 1GB DDR2 800 memory
2x Intel 10/100/1000 Pro/1000 GT Desktop Network Adapter
2x Seagate Barracuda 250GB HD (RAID 1, software RAID)
CentOS 5 x86_64; Kernel 2.6.23 (custom built); Version 7.6.9.2 e1000 driver
The symptoms of this problem are outlined at:
http://e1000.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Issues[1]
2005 Oct 03
2
ethool for e1000
I recently noticed that after starting xend ethtool no longer work for
my e1000 card. In my 2.X box which is a P4, ethtool is working after
xend start. Same version of e1000 on both boxes.
The unstable box is a
Tyan 2462 SMP, FC4 dom0
The 2.X box is
Dell P330 UP, Centos 4.1 domO
Until xend start ethtool is fine, in both setups I am using the e1000 as
eth0.
Regards,
Ted
2018 May 11
0
Re: e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:53:23AM -0700, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC,
> link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is
> executed, which for some buggy images like cirros may slow down boot
> process for up to 1 minute [2]. If we switch from e1000 to virtio, the
> link is
2018 May 10
0
Re: e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
Hi,
try to use virtio instead...
Atte.
Daniel Romero P.
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys@redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC,
> link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is
> executed, which for some buggy images like cirros may slow down boot
> process
2012 Jan 09
0
KVM VM crash under I/O load (e1000 and virtio)
I'm pretty consistently getting crashed KVM VMs under network I/O load when
using the e1000 and virtio NIC models, with the follow message in dmesg:
qemu-kvm[8785]: segfault at d0 ip 00000031e3200a08 sp 0000000047784080 error
4 in libnvidia-tls.so.285.05.23[31e3200000+3000]
qemu-kvm[8791]: segfault at d0 ip 00000031e3200a08 sp 0000000049f89080 error
4 in
2018 Mar 23
2
[PATCH] v2v: ova: convert E1000 network interfaces as such
So far v2v did not read the model of network interfaces, resulting in
"virtio" as the model for such interfaces.
Start reading the model, if available, mapping only E1000 for now.
There are also other models, e.g. PCNet32 or VmxNet3, but they are
ignored for now: reading them as Source_other_nic would result in v2v
rejecting OVAs previously converted.
---
v2v/parse_ovf_from_ova.ml
2006 Jun 25
3
e1000 nic problem
Hi,
I've been experiencing occassional network time-outs with the Intel Gigabit
nic's (e1000) in Poweredge systems.
I'm not sure if it's a hard or software problem but it occurs on different
systems with Centos 4.2 and 4.3 and was wondering if there' s a workaround
available like compiling an updated e1000 module or something.
kind regards,
Geert
-------------- next part
2008 Nov 25
0
7.1 RC E1000 fix
Anyone running 7.1 and using E1000 hardware that has the time, I would
appreciate
any testing you can do. This has an important fix for SuperMicro servers but
any
regression test of the code would be helpful.
Backup the contents of /usr/src/sys/dev/e1000 and then overwrite with this
tarball.
Send feedback to me,
Jack
2009 Mar 21
0
Bug#520629: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64: Intel e1000 network card emulation
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64
Version: 3.2.1-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
Is the e1000 network card within domU no longer available?
With model=e1000 a Xen domain refuses to start while with
etch this was possible.
There are some Windows guests on which I can not install
gplpv, so with lenny they will just get 100mbit ethernet
emulated.
Cheers,
Andreas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: