similar to: Jumbo frames with domUs in bridging mode

Now I''m sure that the following configuration can destroy a PostgreSQL 8.3.5 database: * Linux host (dom0) with XEN, XFS filesystem with "nobarrier", RAID controller with battery backed cache. * XEN vm (domU) with XFS filesystem with "nobarrier" with postgresql * my daughter with 3.5 years switching off the power supply of the server, just behind the UPS Seems XEN

Hi: Reading Red Hat''s Website and a printed manual of RH184 (Red Hat Virtualization course) I see that RHEL 5 only supports RHEL 4.5 and RHEL 5 as paravirtualized guests. So I asume this is the same situation for CentOS 5, right? What''s the dependency between Xen versions for paravirtualized guests? I ask this questions because I got this experiences: 1. Running CentOS 5 as

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Comment #12 from phr-samba at nightsong.com 2011-01-28 20:38 CST ------- Hi, I was about to enter a similar suggestion to this. My very frequent use case is moving files from one directory to another. In that situation the file name does not change--just the directory path leading to it. These are often quite large files (0.2 to

Hi i'm trying to connect to the PSTN in the following way sip ATA -> * -> gnugk -> Cisco AS5300 -> PSTN I'm using asterisk CVS-HEAD-06/01/05-14:33:15 running over RH EL3 Asterisk-Oh323 0.7.2 pre1 Open H323 v1.13.5 pwlib v1.6.6 and I'm having a lot of trouble, gnugk and * both have public ips and are not behind any type of firewall, the sip ATA is behind a firewall and

Hi all, I've just upgraded my home network to a Linksys SRW2024 (with lovely vlan trunking support!) and I'm trying to enable jumbo frames. When I try to set the MTU of an rtl8169 based network card (it's a Netgear RA311), it comes up with an error stating: # ifconfig eth1 mtu 9000 SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument The only options it will take are 1500 or below. Does anyone know

Hi all Is it possible to configure jumbo frames (mtu=9000) on a kvm guest using virtio drivers? Thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

When using OCFS2 in a Oracle RAC set, one would configure OCFS2 to use the private interconnect address ( in cluster.conf). Are there any known issues / reasons not to have the private interconnect set up for jumbo frames when using in conjunction with OCFS2 ? Thanks -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi. Is subj supported or no? If yes, then how? Thanks.

Author: mabloom Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 39c5623029b347adbf2ab92400d25328f7b321ee Log message: 5084264 Error messages output when configure jumbo frames using bge.conf Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/io/pci_pci/pci_pci.c

Hi, ¿ I would like to know how can I use Gigabit Jumbo Frames inside Xen ? I''ve set my eth0 and peth0 mtu to 7000 My question is : Do I should set the mtu inside each domU ? Regards _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I searched the mailman archives for this topic and there were some older messages that indicate that a large MTU should work, but it's not going too well here. I've got three systems (A, B, and C) with kernel 2.6.12.2; there are back-to-back gigabit connections between A & B and between B & C. Testing prior to bridging, the MTU is set to 9000 on every interface and a 100 MB

Hi, Increasing MTU beyond 1500 in Linux dom0 results in ooopses. I did not find any statement whether 2.0 series support jumbos or not in dom0. Does it? TIA, Teemu -- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

The documentation says the bridge will work as far as all interfaces have the same MTU, but I also read on this and other mailing lists people having problems when using jumbo frames. What is the current status of jumbo frames support in the bridge? It could also be useful to have the same info on the wiki page. Thanks. -- Luca Lesinigo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On the network theme again. The adapters on the management/storage network all default to an mtu of 1500. Are there plans to be able to indicate when a network supports jumbo frames? Cheers, Justin.

We have a cluster (212 nodes) that are on a gig-e network useing jumbo frames (mtu 6000) To reload a node we have to plug it into a regular 1500 mtu that is running off a differnt port on the head node to install. Is there a way to tell in the 'append' line of /pxelinux.cfg/default to have the bcm5700 module run wiht jumbo frames. this is our append right now append load_ramdisk=1

I would like to use jumbo frame for local interfaces, but I am not sure in which order to set it up. Should it be set on the physical interface first, then on the bridge and on the guest, or in another way? On some servers there are configurations with vlan on the bridge

On 11/09/2015 08:34 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > > Has anyone using CentOS 6 been able to successfully set an mtu larger > than 9710 > on an interface. Maximum frame size varies from implementation to implementation: http://pages.uoregon.edu/joe/jumbo-clean-gear.html It's also worth noting that that due to offloading features in modern NICs, there's often very little benefit

On 11/09/2015 12:36 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/09/2015 08:34 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >> Has anyone using CentOS 6 been able to successfully set an mtu larger >> than 9710 >> on an interface. > Maximum frame size varies from implementation to implementation: > http://pages.uoregon.edu/joe/jumbo-clean-gear.html > > It's also worth noting that that due to

Hi, Has anyone using CentOS 6 been able to successfully set an mtu larger than 9710 on an interface. I am seeing super jumbo frames with length > 10000. ... IP 10.79.4.53.64327 > 10.79.2.53.24294: Flags [.], seq 16060:29200, ack 1, win 32767, length 13140 ... CentOS release 6.7 (Final) Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone:

We are utilizing the xen hypervisor on nexenta with ISCSI as our method of communication with the guests (currently ubuntu but could be moving to centos). Obviously jumbo packet support would be nice to have. The last time I see that on the xen roadmap http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenRoadMap . Is there a canonical place that spells out if jumbo frames are now supported or still on the