similar to: xm balloon - Command balloon is deprecated

Hello everyone, I''m using shorewall successfully on many servers withount any problems and I''m really happy with this great piece of software. But now I ran into a problem with shorewall 3.0.4 on Ubuntu 6.06 running on a vServer. The provider uses virtual interfaces like eth0:vs01 for the customers. The interface eth0 cannot be touched. I''ve read the instructions

Hello, we''re using several test- and development-servers as virtual Xen-machines running on one host. Unfortunately our main application needs much memory. Its not a problem at a first view, because usually only very few instances are running at the same time. But if I understand Xen correctly, its only possible to distribute the physical memory of the machine, not the whole

Sorry for my ignorance but....I''ve installed a debian lenny dom0 with a xen kernel, then I''ve configured two domX. I''ve noticed that there isn''t a kernel installed for these ones. I run aptitude to update packages, I''ve updatede the dom0 kernel but....the others? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

This patch causes "xm mem-set" to be lower bound on domX-min-mem option in xend-config. Another configuration option called domU-min-mem has been introduced, which works similarly to dom0-min-mem. This is prevents users from freezing the system when doing "xm mem-set" on very low values like 32M. Signed-off-by: Aravindh Puthiyaparambil

Hi, I have a quick question: Where is the hypervisor''s log file? I have a lot of messages from xen hypervisor''s printk(KERN_INFO "xm dmesg" just displays the latest ones. Is there any way to access all the messages from hypervisor? Thanks, Weiming _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi: So I have a library function called fooo() in a source file B.c and an external A.c file that is referencing a function fooo() in it. foo is returning a pointer to a structure A.ll: %struct._bar= type { %struct._foo, i32, i32 (%struct.doo*, %struct.doo*, %struct.doo*)* } declare i8* @fooo() #2 B.ll: %struct._bar= type { %struct._foo, i32, i32 (%struct.doo*, %struct.doo*, %struct.doo*)* }

Hi! I am trying to export a PCI device (an AVM Fritzcard PCI ISDN card...) to a domU but when starting my domU I am getting this error: "pciback pci-4-0: 22 Couldn''t locate PCI device (0000:00:06.0)! perhaps already in-use?" My system is running both debian etch in dom0 and domU... Below you can find (hopefully) all important information... Sincerely, Gaubatz Patrick

Hello, I''m new to Xen (and this mailing-list) and facing some problems with the network. I''m stuck and don''t know how to continue. And Google isn''t very helpful either... My setup: - Ubuntu 7.10 for dom0 and Debian 4.0 for all domU - 4 physical NIC (DHCP from my ISP, internal LAN, DMZ & WLAN) - 1 Dom as firewall/router - 1 domU with internal services

Hi, can someone explain the states shown by the ''xm list'' command? ''r'' (running) - The domain is currently running. - This flag is always shown for the Domain 0, but never for unprivileged domains, why? ''b'' (blocked) - The domain is blocked. - What does that mean? Why should a domain be blocked? ''p'' (paused) - The domain

Hi, When I’m compiling a code with –fvisibility=hidden –fPIC for ARM, I find that LLVM generates less optimized code than GCC. For example: test.cpp: void init(void *); int g0[100]; int g1[100]; int g2[100]; void foo() { init(&g0); init(&g1); init(&g2); } Clang will emit 1 GOT entry for each GV and 2 instructions to get the address: ldr

--- On Thu, 9/20/12, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: From: Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Proposal: New DAG node type for reciprocal operation To: "Weiming Zhao" <weimingz at codeaurora.org> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Date: Thursday, September 20, 2012, 3:32 PM Sounds like a reasonable fit for a target-specific DAG combine. I

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:28:38 -0300 > francis picabia via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Well, no it

Given that dom0 is itself doesn''t managed the memory directly that you only need to compile HIGHMEM4G into the dom0 or domU kernels if you intend to use more than 1G in one domX instances. ie. Even if you have more than 1Gb of total physical memory, if none of the domX use more than 1Gb of memory, there is no need to compile in HIGHMEM4G. Or, does dom0 need to be compiled with this in

Yes, what I mean is a target independent node in the ISD::NodeType enum. I already did the node transformation DAGCombiner and target-specific lowering in the first place. It worked. But introducing a specific node will make the logic more clear. For example, in ARM, FDIV is a scalar operation. So, after DAGCombiner and Vector Type legalize, vectorized FDIV has been expanded into scalar versions,

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Well, no it isn't actually on that page, you need to follow an > hyperlink to this page: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_rid > > It is really confusing. rid or tdb. I don't know what it wants because the second link has both. Here is the

Hi, For the following code: void foo (); int main () {foo();} llvm emits "bl foo" Then I set foo at a far address in linking: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wl,--defsym=foo=0x80000000 a.o -o a.exe I got an error from ld: a.c:(.text+0x8): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against symbol `foo' define in *ABS* section in a.exe The question is: do I

Hello everybody! I´d like to know where "xm top" gets its information from. I want to get those informations (cpu-load, mem etc. from the domUs) and display them with php in a browser. So are the informations stored and updated in a textfile or something like that? Can anybody help me with this? Regards Alexandros _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing

Yes, it's a bug. Please review https://reviews.llvm.org/D31716 On 4/5/2017 3:50 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 21 March 2017 at 18:32, Peter Jakubek via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> I think the current implementation for the call "bl __aeabi_idiv0" in >> builtins\arm\udivsi3.S is broken. >> At least for the case that __aeabi_idiv0

Hello, I searched the mail list, but can''t find a solution. I have a machine with 8 cores. I want to set the CPU affinity for dom0. For example, let Dom0 use processor 0-3, let guests use 4-7 For guest domains, I can do this by setting the "cpus" For dom0. there''s no such option. The only one I know is in /etc/xen- config.sxp, which has "dom0-cpus" setting.

I've read there can be issues with /tmp so I switched the test to /var/tmp One file (foo.txt) is made by the shell user, while the other file (doo.txt) is made by the same user connected over Samba. bash-3.2$ ls -n doo.txt -rwxr--r-- 1 3000 3004 29 Jul 4 09:51 doo.txt bash-3.2$ ls -n foo.txt -rw-rw---- 1 61001 10 39 Jul 4 09:50 foo.txt With -l they both seem