similar to: can not install vista ultimate 32 bit

Hi, I have 2 identical xSeries 346 with 2 identical IBM 72GB scsi drive. What i did is install the centos 4.2 serverCD on the first IBM and set the HDD to raid1 and raid0 for swap. Now what i did is get the 2nd HDD in the 1st Server swap it with the 1st HDD in the 2nd Server and rebuild the Raids. The 1st server rebuild the array fine. My problem is the Second server, after rebuilding it and

Hi, I have high IO-Wait on the ods (ceph), the osd are running a v3.1-rc9 kernel. I also experience high IO-rates, around 500IO/s reported via iostat. Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util sda 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.80 0.00 62.40 18.35 0.04 5.29 0.00 5.29 5.29 3.60 sdb

Hello, I had a raid1 btrfs (540GB) on vanilla 3.6.3, a disk failed, and removed it at power off, plugged in a new one, partitioned it (to 110GB, by error), and added it to btrfs. I tried to remove the missing device, and it said "Input/output error" after a while. Next attempts simply gave "Invalid argument". I repartitioned, rebooted the system, and made the partition grow:

Hi all, I have another problem with starting domainU (xenolinux). I took me pretty much quite some time and i can not figure out why starting a new domain is failing. I will really appreciate if somebody can help me with this error. The error I get when booting xen-domainU is: /======================= Red Hat nash version 4.1.18 starting Mounted /proc filesystem Mounting sysfs Creating /dev

Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 16:46, Plant, Dean wrote: >> I need to downgrade a system from Centos x4.2 to v3.6 (x86) due to >> performance problems with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape >> drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 >> partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos >> complains on

Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under

Hi All, I am having an issue with an XFS filesystem shutting down under high load with very many small files. Basically, I have around 3.5 - 4 million files on this filesystem. New files are being written to the FS all the time, until I get to 9-11 mln small files (35k on average). at some point I get the following in dmesg: [2870477.695512] Filesystem "sda5": XFS internal error

Hi, Now with the new libguestfs-1.27.55-1.1 I have this new issue : libguestfs: trace: is_file = 0 libguestfs: trace: is_file "/freedos/freedos.ico" libguestfs: trace: is_file = 0 libguestfs: trace: is_file "/boot/loader.rc" libguestfs: trace: is_file = 0 libguestfs: trace: umount_all libguestfs: trace: umount_all = 0 libguestfs: trace: vfs_type "/dev/sda2"

Hi, I''m starting to play with btrfs on my new computer. I''m running Gentoo and have compiled the 2.6.31 kernel, enabling btrfs. Now I have 2 partitions (on 2 different sata disks) that are free for me to play with, each about 375 gb in size. I wanted to create a "raid1" volume using these two partitions, so I did: # mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdb5 # mount

Hi, guys. I''m trying to use physical disks as virtual disks in HVM domains. But I couldn''t. I''m using cs10508 of xen-unstable.hg. When I use disk = [ ''phy:sda5,ioemu:hda,w'' ] in conf file, creating HVM domain says, I need to use ''file'' modifier if I use ''ioemu''. So, I changed it to disk = [

Hi A box was installed with the majority of the free space in /home but i actually want this to be available to /opt. My fstab had /home looking like this LABEL=/home /home ext3 defaults 1 2 I umounted /home and changed the fstab to look like this /dev/sda5 /opt ext3 defaults 1 2 and then mounted /opt. All works

I have seen this happen a number of times: Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda5): ext3_get_inode_block: bad inode number: 9 Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: Aborting journal on device sda5. Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda5): ext3_get_inode_block: bad inode number: 9 Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 last message repeated 6 times Jun 13 13:58:18 n202 kernel: ext3_abort

Roland, On 2020-09-10 21:27, Roland wrote: >> with rsync hanging - after breakout on /home for writing I then get: >> "Read-only file system" > > if your filesystem switches to read-only, you have a serious problem > with your system/storage, not with rsync. > > rsync (or the workload) is simply triggering the problem. Thanks for the response . . Hmm . .

Hi, I''m hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with loop, encryption etc. # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using error checking /dev/sda5 mount status Is there something I can do to resolve this? Thank you Lubos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Just got Wine 1.1.13 on Ubuntu 8.10 tried to map D: to my Windows partition /dev/sda5 /media/DATA but Wine wouldn't keep my choice and reverts to /media/cdrom0. Found out that permissions for ~/.wine/dosdevices/d: were root only and couldn't change them. So I deleted d: & d:: and made new symbolic links $ sudo rm -r /home/me/.wine/dosdevices/d* $ ln -s /media/DATA

On 04/30/2015 06:51 PM, Chen, Hanxiao wrote: > Hi, Rich > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard W.M. Jones [mailto:rjones@redhat.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 7:04 PM >> To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄 >> Cc: libguestfs@redhat.com >> Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH 00/10] virt-resize: add support for resizing MBR >> logical partitions

Hi I had installed Xen-3.0.4 in Scientific linux 4 (kernel version 2.6.16.33) by following the instructions given in following link project-xen.web.cern.ch/project-xen/xen/howto_slcXen.html I ve created the guest Domain with fedora image of size 2.2GB , disk space as 10GB and the domain started successfully . when i logged into the xm console and checked the disk space its showing only 2.2GB ..

LGTM Another thing concerning the disklabel partitions is that list_filesystems() will print both /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda5 as ufs file systems. I don't know if you care to change this. The fact is that both are mountable. P.S. I wish the kernel folks would stop treating the disklabel partitions as logical partitions. Logical partitions are sequential, there are no gaps in the numbering. On

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:25:03AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 09:14:13AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 09:45:26AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > >>On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 05:17:42PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >>>Two simple patches which make libnbd compile on FreeBSD. > >>> >

Hi, I planned to boost my btrfs performance today. here some errors I met: my ''btrfs filesystem show'' result: ~ # btrfs filesystem show failed to read /dev/sr0 Label: none uuid: 9b9aa9d9-760e-445c-a0ab-68e102d9f02e Total devices 1 FS bytes used 36.59GB devid 1 size 49.52GB used 49.52GB path /dev/sda6 Label: none uuid: 559dec06-4fd0-47c1-97b8-cc4fa6153fa0