similar to: Bridge Network route Dom0 through a DomU?

Hi, I would like to ask concerning problems after installing xen 3.3 on Centos 5.2 I use 2.6.18.8-xen (xen3.3.1 testing - installing with mercurial). After done with make world and make install, I did mkinitrd and placing it in /boot changing the grub and reboot.. succeded I do not install libvirt and the domUs from the previous xen 3.0 (built-in Centos 5.2) are NOT able to start : [root@wing

Hi list! I''m trying to figure out a way to use network configuration scripts provided by the distribution to manage network/bridge configuration with xen.. This means I dont''t want use xen "network-bridge" (or any other) script at all, because they are a bit limited in functionality. I want to setup VLAN interfaces with the scripts/tools provided by the

think i posted in the wrong ml the first time, sorry, reposting here hi, i recently updated to xen 3.2 and now networking has stopped working. i have a configuration with 2 nics: eth1 (internet) and eth0 (lan) when i start xen i get peth0,peth1 with no ip, and bridge eth0,eth1 with the right addresses the server running xen is also the lan gw the routing table seems ok 192.168.0.0 *

hello, I want to configure 2 interface like this eth0 for LAN is 172.16.0.3 eth1 for SAN is 192.168.0.13 I want all VM can access to all network my configuration is : (network-script ''network-bridge netdev=eth0'') to have peth0 and I have a peth0 interface (network-script ''network-bridge netdev=eth1'') to have peth1but I don''t have a peth1 interface

Hi, I found this mail about network problems in the archive. I think I have the same network problems with a routing (with or without NAT) domU connected by two network bridges. The dom0 logs thousands of following messages: -- Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet -- and all outgoing TCP packets have wrong TCP checksums (traced on another machine on the

Hi *.*, This is a continuation on the 2 NICs thread after some more testing. Just to remember my goal. --------------------------- I want to create a domU with 2 virtual NICS. One of them will contact the outside world, the other one will contact a VPN. No reason in concrete for choosing the bridging protocol, only because its the default one. I installed the dom0 with the 2 NICs active, with

Hallo, I have running xen-4.2/linux-3.8 (compiled) on any hosts. - dell pe r720: drac, eth0-3:igb squeeze -> boot_xen:ok net:ok bridge:ok - dell pe R620: drac=eth0, eth1-3:tg3 wheezy -> boot_xen:ok net:ok bridge:fail So i running "xend start" (or "xenbridges start") on my patient (R620 with broadcom tg3) network will be lost: RTNETLINK answers: File exists

Hi, XEN confused me very much. In the config file I had: vif = [ ''mac=00:16:3e:ff:3b:18,bridge=xenbr0'', ''mac=00:16:3e:c0:92:08,bridge=xenbr1'' ] The idea was to connect eth0(peth0) via xenbr0 to DomU''s eth0, and eth1(peth1) via xenbr1 to DomU''s eth1. However it turned out that the first address is assigned to "eth2" in DomU,

If you get a lot of those messages and you don''t want them: peth1: received packet with own address as source address or peth0: received packet with own address as source address This is the way I found to solve this problem on Debian maybe someone can post more information about other distribution like suse or redhat... This problem will occur if you have more than one dom0 on your

Hi All, I have a weird issue I''m not sure how to solve.  I''ve got Xen 3.2.1 working under RHEL 5.2 x86_64 just fine.  I fired off a CentOS 5.2 PV install and everything went smoothly... except that when I fire up the PV, the tap0 for bridging isn''t being created.  This results in the CentOS 5.2 domU''s bridged eth0 only being able to ping the RHEL5

> That''s great, except when you need *two* bridges, for two > independent subnets, and there is no, as far as I can see, peth1. You can have multiple vethX interfaces on recent builds -- see netback/loopback.c. I think the current default is a rather miserly 1 (and should be increased), but can be set on the command line. Ian > Em Wednesday 14 September 2005 16:30, John

I have a OpenSuse 10.3 with xen 3.1.0 running and it''s been running fine for a few months. This past weekend it suddenly started to act up and after some troubleshooting I can now say that it seems like the guests(domU) loose the outgoing network pipe, from the console I can see that the TX counter is stuck at the same value but it''s no errors. It behaves as if whatever I try to

Hi, I have 3 xen box with 2-3 VM on each. Each server has 2 nic (1 for external and 1 for internal network). All VMs are webserver and they mount a nfs filesystem. I''ve noticed that on each dom0 there are many dropped packets. Server config is: 1- DELL (2xQuad Xeon E5320 @1.86Ghz - 8Gb Ram - Perc5 - Kernel 2.6.18-6 (debian etch)) 2- DELL (2xDual Xeon 5110 @1.60Ghz - 4Gb Ram - Perc5 -

Hello Everyone, I have set up a xen server with 10 physical network devices using the bridge mode of XEN. This is because I want to split and separate the network traffic for security reasons. Maybe the best way is to use pci back hide. But I want to understand what is going on here. For all testings I have only activated eth[0-3]. My first tests were successful. I have created a VM using

Hello all, I would like to use two network interfaces. It is working but I notice that both bridges hace the same id. #brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no peth0 vif0.0 vif10.0 xenbr1

Hi all, I have a strange problem with GPL PV 0.8.8 (0.6.4 did work). On my 2nd vif I cannot establish TCP connections. The 3rd IP packet (ACK from XEN-Image) is not forwarded by XEN/DOM0-Bridge. If I boot Windows without /GPLPV option, everything works fine. I did some investigation and found out that the packages arrive differently if GPLPV is enabled. "br_inet" is a bridge

I have seen those documents, I did not see anything that indicates how _automatic_ bridge configuration could be enabled with xl. For my specific set up I have two bridges (xenbr0 -> peth0 & xenbr1 -> peth1). If I have to configure this manually with ifcfg scripts I will, but if an automatic method is provided or is possible with xl I'd prefer to use that. -Gene On Thu, Jan 29,

Is their presently any way to get a domU to use a domO''s loop interface? In the past I have used loop interfaces to prevent Layer 2 issues with high availability network setups and it works like a charm for and server side apps. Regards, Ted _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi Folks: I have a strange problem with multiple (2) NICs on a CentOS 5.5 dom0 setup running xen 3.4.3 and have been struggling to fix it for some time. I could not find anything by googling or searching through this list but that is probably because I couldn''t figure out the correct search terms. After I configure my bridges the command "system network restart" fails for eth1

Hello all, I have a Xen server with 6 network interfaces, I want a bridge on all of them. I use a personal network script like this : #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@"