similar to: [ATTN] To all users of unicode_hacks

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[ATTN] To all users of unicode_hacks"

2006 Apr 23
0
Using unicode_hacks breaks Rails 1.1 RJS
All, I wasted an hour on this, so here''s a quick post to save you from the same. If you are using "unicode_hacks":http://julik.textdriven.com/svn/tools/rails_plugins/unicode_hacks/ for "multi-lingual support":[http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowToUseUnicodeStrings/versions/40] (i18n), there''s a gotcha - RJS templates will not work. The culprit is
2005 Dec 21
10
Investigating Unicode. Take 2, with nastities and allegations.
Well, I see that my last email hasn''t generated any reaction from the Rails core team. It looks like all of them are the happy users of "plain text" (which, as we know by now, doesn''t exist, but still). I apologize in advance for the sore bitterness of this message but I see that the Rails-core STILL, despite all of the efforts, sees these issues as something
2006 Jan 05
1
unicode hacks - fixes for webrick and Safari
Hello! First, thank you Julian for the useful plugin ''unicode_hacks'' < http://julik.textdriven.com/svn/tools/rails_plugins/unicode_hacks/>. I have found some problems running my app in development on Webrick and looking at it with Safari (MacOS X 10.4.3, Safari 2.0.2). Some files are sent with different sizes (e.g. default css example, or controls.js ), and it
2007 Feb 05
4
Lots of Internal Server Errors lately
Lately I''ve seen a lot of Internet Server Errors while trying to use Trac. Is there a plan to do something about this, or is it time to start sending donations for a new server? ;) Kind regards, Thijs -- Fingertips - http://www.fngtps.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on
2006 Jan 30
15
i18n when?
Hi all, Just wondering... Are there any plans to include i18n support in Rails anytime soon? I guess this is about the only feature I''m realy missing in Rails. Any thoughts? Regards, Harm de Laat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060130/63681052/attachment.html
2006 Mar 21
2
How do I get substring of utf-8 string?
I''m trying to get substring from a utf-8 encoded string. (say, first 50 characters of the string) String#[0..49] would give me the first 50 bytes not 50 characters.. I know there is jcode library, but it only let you count number of characters in utf-8 string. unicode gem doesn''t seem to help much. unicode_hacks gem seem to solve the problem, but it also seems to
2006 Jun 25
7
Unicode HOWTO?
I am disappointed about the (seeming) lack of Unicode support in Rails. Is there a howto about working the most important limitations? For example, figuring out the length of an entered word: "???".length() will return 6, not 3. So if there is a maximum number of characters a user is allowed to enter, this won''t work as it should -- it treats strings as byte arrays instead
2016 May 26
1
[Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
All the MIPS buildbots are ready too. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-dev Sent: 25 May 2016 23:03 To: Chris Bieneman; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On
2016 May 25
0
[Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:54 AM Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > Meant to send this yesterday, but I want to remind everyone that we’re > going to be raising the CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 next week. > > If you maintain bots please ensure that your bots are updated by end of > day 5/29 so that we can move on 5/30
2005 Jun 09
0
OT: SpamFiltering (used to be: ATTN: Keith)
Kind of spawns an interesting side topic though..... I recommend SpamHaus.org for a good blacklist.... Easy to integrate into most mail servers and you can't beat free... Cheers, Wiley -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:40 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing
2009 Feb 11
1
where to submit new logcheck rules?
Hi, I've got a few logcheck ignore.d rules that I'd like to submit, one example is sqlgrey. /usr/share/doc/logcheck/README.maintainer talks about shipping the rules inside the package itself, so I could file a request with sqlgrey. However, that doesn't work because of course I don't have all the packages I use on my network installed on my loghost. In fact, I believe that
2013 Feb 12
0
Wiki link / Attn:samba dev team, web maint..
The Wiki page has been SSL-only for a few days to a week or so. [perhaps this is by design, I don't know - but it is different than it was a week or more ago.] But the link to it from the main samba.org page is wrong and the suggested link doesn't get you to the wiki either. [It goes to CIFS.ORG.] Most of us can find our way - but it probably needs addressing sometime soon. -Greg
2008 Oct 05
2
Attn Ivo. Re patches 15347 and 15376
Ivo, Your patch number 16347 uses _fseeki64 when _WIN32 is defined. Unfortunately, MinGW (or at least the Linux -> Win32 cross compiler I'm using) defines _WIN32 but isn't aware of _fseeki64. I have therefore modified your solution a little and commited it as rev 15376. The code now looks like this: #ifdef __MINGW32__ return fseeko64(f,off,whence); #elif defined
2008 Jan 18
1
ATTN: Acts as tree users
Acts as tree users: please review ticket http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10843 and add comment with +1 -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to
2012 Feb 06
0
Attn Fedora Rawhide users
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=libguestfs.git;a=blob;f=0001-Workaround-for-usrmove-in-Fedora.patch;hb=HEAD I have added this patch (not upstream) ^^ This is a workaround for a rather misguided feature called 'usrmove' which was just dumped without notice into Rawhide, 3 days before the F17 branch, while everyone was away at FOSDEM. I still haven't got libguestfs to build
2013 May 30
0
Re: ATTN: Denial of service attack possible on libguestfs 1.21.x, libguestfs.1.22.0
On Tue, May 28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > There's a denial of service attack possible from guests on any program > that does inspection (eg. virt-inspector, many other virt-* tools, > virt-v2v, OpenStack). > > The attack causes the host process to crash because of a double free. > It's probably not exploitable (definitely not on Fedora because of the >
2013 May 31
1
Re: ATTN: Denial of service attack possible on libguestfs 1.21.x, libguestfs.1.22.0
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:03:24AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > #2 0x00007ffff7b7936c in guestfs___safe_strdup (g=0x65da50, str=0x0) at alloc.c:96 > #3 0x00007ffff7b8b65e in parse_suse_release (filename=<optimized out>, fs=<optimized out>, g=<optimized out>) at inspect-fs-unix.c:343 This is a different problem: lines = guestfs_head_n (g, 10, filename); if (lines ==
2013 May 31
1
Re: ATTN: Denial of service attack possible on libguestfs 1.21.x, libguestfs.1.22.0
This should fix it I think. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
2013 May 29
0
CVE-2013-2124 (was: Re: ATTN: Denial of service attack possible on libguestfs)
This issue has been assigned CVE-2013-2124. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
2012 May 15
1
[LLVMdev] ATTN: PTX Back-End Users - EOL
Now that the NVPTX back-end has been integrated into ToT and already surpasses the PTX back-end in terms of functionality, I plan to remove the PTX back-end from the LLVM tree soon. The only change that users will need to be aware of are the address space mapping (please see lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTX.h for the new mappings). The old intrinsics will remain valid for the new NVPTX back-end. What I