similar to: Re: annoying network problem

On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 17:56 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote: [...] > So the question is: why does the VM run stable on xen1 while it > crashes all the time on xen2. If I compare xen1 and xen2, only > real difference is mainboard (Supermicro X8 on xen1; Supermicro > X9 on xen2) and CPU (Xeon L5939 on xen1; E5-2609 on xen2) > > As a next step I'll put the harddisks into another

reassign 758622 linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 thanks Hi Ben, thanks for your response. Am 2014-11-05 21:40, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 17:56 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote: > [...] >> So the question is: why does the VM run stable on xen1 while it >> crashes all the time on xen2. If I compare xen1 and xen2, only >> real difference is mainboard (Supermicro X8

And some more information ... Am 2014-10-13 12:04, schrieb Jonas Meurer: > Am 2014-08-19 12:26, schrieb Jonas Meurer: >> I encounter kernel crashes on an up-to-date Debian/Wheezy Xen domU >> with the >> stock kernel. The dom0 runs the same linux kernel and >> xen/4.1.4-3+deb7u1. > > the bug is still reproducible with the latest kernel and Xen packages >

Lets say you had 4 servers and you wanted to setup replicate and distribute. What methoid would be better: server sdb1 xen0 brick0 xen1 mirror0 xen2 brick1 xen3 mirror1 replicate block0 - brick0 mirror0 replicate block1 - brick1 mirror1 distribute unify - block0 block1 or server sdb1 sdb2 xen0 brick0 mirror3 xen1 brick1 mirror0 xen2 brick2 mirror1 xen3 brick3 mirror2 replicate block0 -

Hi, i just want to know whether there are any alternative file systems for HP SFS. I heard that there is Cluster Gateway from Polyserve. Can anybody plz help me in finding more abt this Cluster Gateway. Thanks and Regards, Ashok Bharat -----Original Message----- From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org Sent: Tue 2/12/2008 3:18 AM

I just tried to setup another domain on a server running 1 domain. When i try to start the domain it gives me an error Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Backend device not found. The entry in my xen config file for the disks is disk = [''phy:/dev/xen001/xen2-fun,sda1,w'',''phy:/dev/xen001/xen2-fun-swap,sda2,w''] Looking at /var/log/xend.log, i found

This is my second mail because the first one turned into a two page novel. Basically my question is this, what is your opinion on the following, in regards to having to know about the os and USE in your hosting environtment. Here is my problem... We have a sales guy that sold people on the idea of having 4 windows clients, and 2 "filestore" servers. filestore1 backs up to filestore2 so

We have a cluster (212 nodes) that are on a gig-e network useing jumbo frames (mtu 6000) To reload a node we have to plug it into a regular 1500 mtu that is running off a differnt port on the head node to install. Is there a way to tell in the 'append' line of /pxelinux.cfg/default to have the bcm5700 module run wiht jumbo frames. this is our append right now append load_ramdisk=1

Is there instructions on how to use the patchless client on RHEL4 ? For version 1.6.2 We would prefer a rpm, but we are not scared of doing a build if needed. Brock Palen Center for Advanced Computing brockp at umich.edu (734)936-1985

Hi all, We''ve been using Xen 3.0.3-1 on Debian Etch for around 2 years now using standard Xen bridging. Over the past few months, we''ve experienced the periodic disappearance of VIF macs from the FDB of the bridge. It seems to happen at random, primarily with domUs that typically receive less network traffic. When the VIF stops responding, the mac address for it still shows up

Hi! Using the following extlinux.conf serial 0x2f8 57600 0x013 # that is, RTS/CTS flow control on COM2 prompt 1 timeout 100 say Select 'linux' or 'xen'. say Automatically booting 'xen' in 10 seconds. default xen label linux kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-6-686 append initrd=/initrd.img-2.6.18-6-686 root=/dev/mapper/xen1-root ro console=tty0 console=ttyS1,57600n8r noresume

Should I be seeing messages like: Dec 14 12:06:59 nyx170 kernel: Lustre: MGS: haven''t heard from client dadccfac-8610-06e7-9c02-90e552694947 (at 141.212.30.185 at tcp) in 234 seconds. I think it''s dead, and I am evicting it. when the client was shut down cleanly? and the lustre file system is mounted via /etc/fstab ? The file system (i would hope) would be unmounted

I use gentoo on xen, in the gentoo docs (gentoo compiles everything almost) they have options like ''-march=pentium3'' should i be using the gcc option for the cpu im using (pentium3), I understand that domU''s and even dom0''s speak the "XEN" arch, so could using cpu specific flags like this cause problems? what are other xen+gentoo users using

Hi Brock, I'm trying set full duplex on a server that is being pxeboot/provisioned via autoyast. We want to ensure the duplex is full DURING the autoyast provisioning itself. I've played the syslinux configs to specify the bcm5600 driver, but was having trouble with setting the network options. I've tryed appending them as well, but nothing on the internet seems to indicate that

I think that it may be appropriate to submit this patch for linux-next instead of 3.15-rc4... On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> wrote: > Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see SET_ETHTOOL_OPS gone. > This does that. > > Compile tested only, but I'd seriously wonder if this broke anything. > > Suggested-by: Dave

SET_ETHTOOL_OPS is equivalent to : #define SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(netdev,ops) \ ( (netdev)->ethtool_ops = (ops) ) how it makes difference removing this code and replacing with the code mentioned ? On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> wrote: > net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS > > Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see

SET_ETHTOOL_OPS is equivalent to : #define SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(netdev,ops) \ ( (netdev)->ethtool_ops = (ops) ) how it makes difference removing this code and replacing with the code mentioned ? On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Wilfried Klaebe <w-lkml at lebenslange-mailadresse.de> wrote: > net: get rid of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS > > Dave Miller mentioned he'd like to see

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 09:59:58AM -0300, Julio Faracco wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Em sex., 22 de nov. de 2019 ?s 07:31, Michael S. Tsirkin > <mst at redhat.com> escreveu: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:36:36PM -0300, Julio Faracco wrote: > > > Driver virtio_net is not handling error events for TX provided by > > > dev_watchdog. This event is

Hi, I found this mail about network problems in the archive. I think I have the same network problems with a routing (with or without NAT) domU connected by two network bridges. The dom0 logs thousands of following messages: -- Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet -- and all outgoing TCP packets have wrong TCP checksums (traced on another machine on the

Em sex., 22 de nov. de 2019 ?s 11:53, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> escreveu: > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 09:59:58AM -0300, Julio Faracco wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > Em sex., 22 de nov. de 2019 ?s 07:31, Michael S. Tsirkin > > <mst at redhat.com> escreveu: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:36:36PM -0300, Julio Faracco