similar to: network-bridge does not create veth or peth devices

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "network-bridge does not create veth or peth devices"

2007 Nov 28
0
[Fwd: Re: network-bridge does not create veth or peth devices]
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Xen-users] network-bridge does not create veth or peth devices Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:42:25 +0100 From: Ingard Mevåg <ingardm@startsiden.no> Organization: ABCStartsiden To: Luciano Rocha <strange@nsk.no-ip.org> References: <474D6492.5030807@startsiden.no> <20071128130205.GA1838@bit.office.eurotux.com> Luciano Rocha
2008 Jan 05
0
latest xen-unstable veth devices missing
Hi, I am using the latest unstable and when I boot my xen, I do not see any veth devices. This happens even after I start xend. Xend gives this message on a "xend start" SIOCSIFNAME : Device or resource busy Presumably the creation of veth and peth is failing because of this. Any suggestions -Padma _______________________________________________
2006 Jun 13
4
peth device
Hi I reached the conclusion that my networking problem stems from the fact that I have no peth0 device. I''m trying to locate what creates the device, but until now no success. So I have a simple question: What creates the peth0 device in dom0? TIA Paolo _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
2009 Aug 05
2
bridge vs macvlan performance (was: some veth related issues)
Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where
2009 Aug 05
2
bridge vs macvlan performance (was: some veth related issues)
Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where
2007 Feb 22
1
how to make initrd image for dom0
Hi. I am trying to make initrd for xen0 but I am not successful. I receive error: #yaird error: Could not read output for /sbin/modprobe -v -n --show-depends --set-version 2.6.16.33-xen0 evdev (fatal). If I do that just for xen kernel (not xen0) it goes without any problem. I guest I have to use initrd for xen0 otherwise it does not want to boot. Similarly, xen kernel without initrd will not
2006 Jul 27
6
Getting stucked with Debian
Hello all, I''m getting stucked with debian and Xen 3.0.2 Problem is that during boot with xen kernel system said: mount: unknown filesystem ''devfs'' and then Unable to open initial console /dev/console And reboot... How can I solve? googled for some information but nothing usefull.. Thanks Stefano -- Ste Visit: http://www.stefanocislaghi.it/
2007 May 14
3
Number of xenbr''s limited to four on openSuSE 10.2 ?
Hi Group ... havin'' read whatever I could "google" on this topic, I didn`t find any solution: openSuSE 10.2 (out of the box), xenkernel, running on HP Proliant DL360G5 (dual internal networking, plus additional 4-port adapter) gives me eth0 - eth5, but only peth0 - peth3 (as well as vif0 - vif3 and consequentely xenbr0 - xenbr3). I increased the number of loopback-devices
2007 May 22
5
Shorewall and Xen with network-dummy
Hello *, I''m trying to setup Shorewall under Ubuntu 7.04 and Xen configured to use network-dummy instead of network-bridge (network-bridge seems to be buggy at the moment under Debian/Ubuntu). Is there a shorewall config example I can use in combination with network-dummy? In particular, with network-dummy there is no peth interface and the bridge include the real eth interface. I
2008 Jul 22
0
RE : No peth after installing Xen
>[root@localhost ~]# /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start > >Device "static" does not exist. > >usage: ifdown <device name> > >Device "static" does not exist. > >Cannot find device "static" > >SIOCGIFFLAGS: No such device requirements: - Interface (eth1) must be "up". (ifup eth1) (setting "ifconfig eth1
2007 Nov 21
3
Xen 3.1.0 and openSuse 10.3 - xenbr0 won''t dissapear
Hello, I use xen for a few months now and I upgraded to opensuse 10.3 with xen 3.1 (64bit versions) recently. Everything works fine, but there is a problem when I change xend-config.sxp to use my own network script (it''s slightly modified version of network-virtual scripts from http://en.opensuse.org/Xen3_yet_another_Virtual_Network_Concept ) instead of default network-bridge script.
2008 Feb 01
3
No peth interface for xenbr4 and xenbr5
Hello all, I have a Xen server with 6 network interfaces, I want a bridge on all of them. I use a personal network script like this : #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@"
2008 Feb 07
0
Question about Virtual Ethernet Pair LKM "VETH"
Hi all ! It seems, that new kernel 2.6.24 offers new feature, that enables me to create pair of virtual Ethernet devices and connect them to each other. This module is called "VETH". However, I have not found any userspace app to use this feature. Please help ! -- -Alexey Eremenko "Technologov"
2006 May 09
0
Re: MTU limits?
> On Friday 02 September 2005 17:58, Patrick O''Rourke wrote: > > The network device on our hardware uses a rather large MTU (~16k), but I > > noticed that when setting up bridging, the MTU for the bridge and veth > > device is set to 1500. Trying to set the MTU on the bridge, or eth > > device to match that of the peth is unsuccessful: > > > >
2019 Mar 13
2
Re: KVM-Docker-Networking using TAP and MACVLAN
On 3/13/19 2:26 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > IIUC, you are using the tap0 device, but it is not plugged anywhere. > By that I > mean there is one end that you created and passed through into the VM, > but there > is no other end of that.  I can think of some complicated ways how to > do what > you are trying to, but hopefully the above explanation will move you > forward
2013 Nov 30
7
[xen-unstable test] 22184: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
flight 22184 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22184/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 22106 test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 9 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 22106 Regressions which are regarded as
2011 Sep 10
2
xen 4.1.1 missing veth0 <--> vif0.0 pairs
Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help
2011 Sep 10
2
xen 4.1.1 missing veth0 <--> vif0.0 pairs
Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help
2007 Jun 25
1
Ping dom0 <-> domU result in "Destination host unreachable"
Hi folks, I read quite some posts about "Destination host unreachable" problems before, but none could help me to solve my issue. So here we go: This is what I am using: SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 SP1 - Current with all updates Network configuration of my dom0: foobar:~ # ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd
2016 Apr 11
2
Re: [Bug 1325687] network type="ethernet" not supported with LXC
Hi Team I'm trying to launch LXC VM with libvirt 1.2.12 having commit *22cff52a2b8e06c913b1f97767e5d3**90fb17fc3b *with below XML configuration.. <domain type="lxc"> <uuid>64c48da2-e318-4085-8b88-c980aab4de34</uuid> <name>test</name> <memory>524288</memory> <vcpu>1</vcpu> <os> <type