similar to: (no subject)

I have inherited a system set up with multipath, which is not something I have seen before so I could use some advice The system is a Dell R420 with 2 LSI SAS2008 HBAs, 4 internal disks, and a MD3200 storage array attached via SAS cables. Oh and CentOS 6 lsblk shows the following: NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sdd 8:48 0 931.5G 0 disk ??sdd1

Hello, I have a weird problem after adding new PV do LMV volume group. It seems the error comes out only during boot time. Please read the story. I have couple of 1U machines. They all have two, four or more Fujitsu-Siemens SAS 2,5" disks, which are bounded in Raid1 pairs with Linux mdadm. First pair of disks has always two arrays (md0, md1). Small md0 is used for booting and the rest - md1

Hi, I see some strange and dangerous things happening on a HPE server with HPE Smart Array controller where EL9 ends up with wrong device nodes/symlinks to the attached disks/raid volumes: (I didn't touch anything here but at 08:09 some symlinks were changed) /dev/disk/by-id/: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 1 07:57 scsi-0HP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_00000000 -> ../../sdc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10

I have a system with 4 disk drives, two 512 Gb and two 1 Tb. It look like this: CentOS release 5.9 (Final) Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes Disk /dev/sdb: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes Disk /dev/sdc: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes Disk /dev/sdd: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes ================================================================= Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes

Hi all. I have a CentOS server: CentOS release 5.7 (Final) 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5 x86_64 I have two SSD disks attached: smartctl -i /dev/sdc smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: INTEL SSDSA2CW120G3 Serial Number: CVPR13010957120LGN Firmware

Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a ?crit : > Hi Niki, > > md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? [root at nestor:~] # lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 232,9G 0 disk ??sda1 8:1 0 3,9G 0 part ? ??md126 9:126 0 3,9G 0 raid1 [SWAP] ??sda2 8:2

Hi, I just replaced Slackware64 14.1 running on my office's HP Proliant Microserver with a fresh installation of CentOS 7. The server has 4 x 250 GB disks. Every disk is configured like this : * 200 MB /dev/sdX1 for /boot * 4 GB /dev/sdX2 for swap * 248 GB /dev/sdX3 for / There are supposed to be no spare devices. /boot and swap are all supposed to be assembled in RAID level 1 across

I am setting up a Centos 6.5 box to host some Openvz containers. I have a 120gb SSD I am going to use for boot, / and swap. Should allow for fast boots. Have a 4TB drive I am going to mount as /backup and use to move container backups too etc. The remaining four 3TB drives I am putting in a software RAID 10 array and mount as /vz and all the containers will go there. It will have by far the

Hi Niki, md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? Regards Michael ----- Urspr?ngliche Mail ----- Von: "Niki Kovacs" <info at microlinux.fr> An: "CentOS mailing list" <CentOS at centos.org> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2015 08:09:13 Betreff: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5

Hi All Currently i'm setting up a 5.4 server and try to create a 3rd raid device, when i run: $mdadm --create /dev/md2 -v --raid-devices=15 --chunk=32 --level=raid6 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj /dev/sdk /dev/sdl /dev/sdm /dev/sdn /dev/sdo /dev/sdp /dev/sdq the device file "md2" is created and the raid is being configured. but somehow

I have LSI Logic MegaRAID 8480 Storage controller I am having trouble reconfigure one of the hardware raid devices It is configured with 4 hardware raid logical volumes on /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd. I am in the middle of rebuilding the system, ?and at this point I am only using one of the volumes, /dev/sda /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, and /dev/sdd are all 2 drive raid1 mirrors I will be

Hi, I''ve got similar problem - after HW failure - two of three disks became unavailable and now I''m unable to btrfsck. Btrfs lays on /dev/sdb1,/dev/sdc1,/dev/sdd1 - sdc+sdd became unavailable Here is kernel log: ============================================ Mar  9 23:56:28 ftp2 kernel: [121492.593338] ata7.00: exception Emask 0x60 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x800 action 0x6 frozen Mar  9

Hey List, So I had a 4 drive software RAID 5 set up consisting of /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1, /dev/sdd1 and /dev/sde1. I reinstalled my OS and after the reinstall I made the mistake of re-assembling the array incorrectly by typing "sudo mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde" in a moment of stupidity. Obviously this didn't work and the array wouldn't mount and

> > Well, i''m using here the qla2340 on several boxes. It works > > with Xen 2.0 but noch with Xen 3.0. as part of SUSE Linux 10.0: > > Interesting. If the driver really doews work flawlessly in > Xen 2, then I think the culprit has to be interrupt routeing. > > Under Xen 3, does /proc/interrupts show you''re receiving interrupts? I cannot boot with

> > Well, i''m using here the qla2340 on several boxes. It works > > with Xen 2.0 but noch with Xen 3.0. as part of SUSE Linux 10.0: > > Interesting. If the driver really doews work flawlessly in > Xen 2, then I think the culprit has to be interrupt routeing. > > Under Xen 3, does /proc/interrupts show you''re receiving interrupts? I cannot boot with

Hi, This is my current config: /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2 + sdd2 -> form VolGroup00 with md2 /dev/md2 -> 18 GB -> sdb1 + sde1 -> form VolGroup00 with md1 sda,sdd -> 36 GB 10k SCSI HDDs sdb,sde -> 18 GB 10k SCSI HDDs I have added 2 36 GB 10K SCSI drives in it, they are detected as sdc and sdf. What should I do if I

This change renames the following 2 apis: * mdadm_create -> md_create * mdadm_detail -> md_detail This is more consistent with list_md_devices, and removes a reference to an implementation detail from the api. --- daemon/md.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ generator/generator_actions.ml | 4 ++-- regressions/test-list-filesystems.sh | 2 +-

Hello, I just upgraded from Xen-3.3.1 to Xen-4.0.0. System is Gentoo, Hardware is DualCore AMD Athlon, 8GB RAM. The kernel was upgraded from OpenSUSE 2.6.27.29-0.1.1 to Gentoo-2.6.32-xen- r1. The first boot failed with an OOM error during kernel/initrd load, so I adjusted the dom0_mem option and had to increase it''s avalue from 256M to at least 400M until the dom0 could boot. At all

thanks for the reply, Phil It would, were udev not inserting USB and/or eSATA drives at /dev/sdb1 and/or /dev/sdc1 and exposing the array to the udev rule intended to handle only removable devices (at sdc or sdd). The array then mounts unpredictably in /media/xxx-sdc1 or sdd1 - not what is wanted - depend on how many removable devices are plugged at the time of rebooting. Of course, a single

OK todays problem. I have a HP N54L Microserver running centos 6.5. In this box I have a 3x2TB disk raid 5 array, which I am in the process of extending to a 4x2TB raid 5 array. I've added the new disk --> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdb And grown the array --> mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --raid-devices=4 Now the problem the resync speed is v slow, it refuses to rise above 5MB, in general