similar to: xm info changed from version 3.0 to 3.1 ?

I have a couple sles11 servers running xen 3.4: # xm info host : xen03 release : 2.6.27.19-5-xen version : #1 SMP 2009-02-28 04:40:21 +0100 machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 16 nr_nodes : 1 cores_per_socket : 4 threads_per_core : 2 cpu_mhz : 2533 hw_caps :

List, here''s how I got 4.1 up on suse 11.4 There is a small bug with the xencommons init script preventing xenstored from starting. Add this repo for 4.1 RPM''s ------------- zypper ar http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Virtualization/openSUSE_11.4 Virt zypper ref zypper in xen-4.1.0_01-106.1 Fix the xen inits  (observe the order here) ------------ chkconfig -s

Hi, I am using xen 3.1.0 on opensuse 10.3, for more details see below. When I try to start the third domU, then this will not work, I get the error: Error: Boot loader didn''t return any data! When I shutdown an other one, I can successfully start the machine that failed, see my log below. The xen configuration files are all similar to this one: name="FTP"

I have a OpenSuse 10.3 with xen 3.1.0 running and it''s been running fine for a few months. This past weekend it suddenly started to act up and after some troubleshooting I can now say that it seems like the guests(domU) loose the outgoing network pipe, from the console I can see that the TX counter is stuck at the same value but it''s no errors. It behaves as if whatever I try to

Hello, I am running a mail benchmark test using smtp-source[1] with VM running postfix on Xen hypervisor. My system configuration is: uname -a -> Linux cadlab 3.1.10-1.19-xen #1 SMP Mon Feb 25 10:32:50 UTC 2013 (f0b13a3) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I am observing a very high disk write usage by xenstored (some 5 Mbps) without even anything running on the VM. Is it normal? During test, I

Hello, I am running a mail benchmark test using smtp-source[1] with VM running postfix on Xen hypervisor. My system configuration is: uname -a -> Linux cadlab 3.1.10-1.19-xen #1 SMP Mon Feb 25 10:32:50 UTC 2013 (f0b13a3) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I am observing a very high disk write usage by xenstored (some 5 Mbps) without even anything running on the VM. Is it normal? During test, I

i''m reading up on numa usage. so far, i''ve enabled numa on my Xen box. @ Dom0 i see, xm dmesg | grep -i numa (XEN) Command line: ... numa=on ... (XEN) No NUMA configuration found i guess i need to ''configure'' numa. i''ve no clue how, and haven''t found the docs for it yet, despite looking. i found this old thread,

I am thoughly confused with the various Xen 3.0.3 versions for Suse. Firt there is not for suse 10.1, so I gues I woulllt the source tarball and compile. ( I tried the RPM for 10.0 (I am running SuSE 10.1) but it caused a kernel panic) I have 5 packages listed unter Yast software management (not including documentation,pdf, etc). Kernel-xen ver 2.6.16.21.25 Xen 3.02_09763-0.8 xen-libs

After upgrade via http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Virtualization:/openSUSE11.3/openSUSE_11.3/src/xen-4.0.1_21326_01-1.1.src.rpm with any "kotd" or 2.6.34.4-2.2-xen VFB gets broken . It worked with original  Xen 4.0, no matter of  some additional patching to support ZFS 24 has been done and 4.0 src.rpm has been rebuilt to reinstall 4.0   In particular,  virt-install fails to

Great to hear, thanks! On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:56 PM Jake Ehrlich <jakehehrlich at google.com> wrote: > A member of my team +Armando Montanez <amontanez at google.com> is going to > drop a proposal for the ELF part of this soon (like sometime next week) and > will be working on the implementation. I'll be one of the reviewers for > anything that comes out of that so

Was there any progress in the upstreaming effort? I'd be interested in having lld be able to link against tbd files, and I think it'd be cool if libtool -static could write tbd files (similar to thin archives on linux) since that should make archiving much faster. Juergen, maybe uploading your initial patch to phabricator instead of attaching might get more traction? On Wed, Apr 25, 2018

These xm info, top, dmesg and log requre no parameter. But log''s error message differs from other 3 command''s error messages, when parameter is given. # xm log 1 Error: ''xm log'' requires 0 argument. log Print the xend log Other 3 commands ignore parameter. I think it might be better symmetricalize. Signed-off-by: Yoshinori

This patch extends libxc for few new functions on xen version and xen compile info. It also extends python wrapper correspondingly. Here is the output of new "xm info" --- #xm info system : Linux host : ubuntu xen_release : 3.0-devel xen_compile_by : root@localdomain xen_compiler : gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8ubuntu2)

VT is enabled in BIOS and ''xm info'' shows that hvm can be created like below: xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm -3.0-x86_64 Several Windows VMs have been created on this server and running perfectly. However, I wonder that it does not show anything when commands show VT-x availability such as ''xm dmesg | grep VMX(or

Hi, How can I get network info for domU similar to xm top & then ''N''.. I want to run a shell script to read this.. Thanks in advance, - regards Pallab _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I have a question. Why does not xen-3.0-unstable display "system" by xm info command? Best regards, Kan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Darn, and here I was thinking <small town> Melbourne, FL, USA =( _____ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of jurgen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 11:16 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Evening in

Be there and be square! PaulH -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of jurgen Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2005 8:54 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Melbourne Asterisk Users meet TONIGHT Hi all, Just a quick reminder: If you're in Melbourne

Hi, Curiously, it''s worth noting that Xeon Processor 5100 series are not in the list of HVM Compatible Processors : http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HVM_Compatible_Processors Patrick ----- Message d''origine ---- De : Mohamed Zohny <mohamad.zohny@gmail.com> À : xen-users <xen-users@lists.xensource.com> Envoyé le : Mercredi, 8 Novembre 2006, 9h17mn 08s Objet :

That sounds great to me, thanks Jake. I'm not Jurgen either, of course, but I'm happy to assist you if he is unavailable. I'm not also not qualified to audit the license, but do note Apple formally also released some code at https://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/tapi/. If there's anything else I can do to help, let me know. Cheers, John On 04/10/2018 06:13 PM, Jake Ehrlich