similar to: 2.6.20 domU kernel on 2.6.16 kernel

Hi all, I need to monitor all traffic and block bad requests on my guest machines and also on my xen host. To accomplish this I think to install snort on my dom0 host (rhel5). Somebody have tried this? What about performance on guests?? Many thanks ... -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

i just ran install.sh from the xen 3.0.2 pre-built distribution. in /boot it put vmlinuz-2.6.16-xen vmlinuz-2.6-xen -> vmlinuz-2.6.16-xen what happened to the xen0 and xenU kernels? also in /boot from xen 3.0.1 is vmlinuz-2.6-xen0 -> vmlinuz-2.6.12.6-xen0 vmlinuz-2.6-xenU -> vmlinuz-2.6.12.6-xenU which is what i expected from xen 3.0.2. don

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Cannot boot Windows 2000 - Only one CPU is detected in SMP dom0 - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: + Build&Boot UP xen0 without problem + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2

We have tested latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset.Here is the test summary. Issues: - IA-32 VMX guest will hang when booting on IA-32PAE host with acpi=1 and apic=1.(Bug 594) - Failed to created VMX after tens of VMXs have been created & destroyed on IA-32e.(Bug593) IA-32: Build&Boot SMP xen0 without problem Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (3): ================================================= 1).time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://losvmm-bridge.sh.intel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP Windows 2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network

Hi, I have compiled xen-unstable (using hg clone http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg). I have successfully booted into the dom0 kernel. output of xm list: Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 932 1 r----- 591.2 But whenever I xm create, I get: # xm create /etc/xen/domu1 Using config file

The first time I installed xen there were two kernels, this time with 3.0.2, there is only one kernel, everything works. I can boot my dom0 and my domU''s using this one kernel but if I want to build a custom kernel for my domU''s but I am not sure from what I read on how to go about it. Will I end up with a new kernel other than my single kernel? Should I do the kernel config in

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (4): ================================================= 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t work. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=840 2)time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=895 You

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 965/5000P chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: ========================= 1). VBD could not work well Partial support is added in c/s 13198, but the loader still complains that symbol "irq_to_evtchn_port" is missing. 2). IA32E: IA32E vista can''t boot up normally, it gives a blue screen. Then the qemu window

Noniko, I saw your posting titled "SUSE10.1 has a nice Xen package again" and I was wondering if you had found any documentation on how to run Fedora Core 5 on top of SUSE10.1. Did you build the Fedora environment on a separate Fedora machine and then brought it over to the SUSE machine or did you find the Fedora tools (Yum/Anaconda) on SUSE? Many thanks in advance. Jose Betancourt

Hello, Anbody has already installed one version fedora 3 or 2 under DomU ? I have dom0 kernel xen vesion 3 under fedora core 4 and i would like install other version on domU. Thanks by avance Eric -------------- ALICE HAUT DEBIT : TRIPLE PLAY A 29,95 EUR/MOIS -------------- Découvrez vite ALICEBOX : avec le modem WIFI, profitez de l''ADSL, de la TELEPHONIE et en exclusivité de la

Hi guys, Another strange behavior with some test servers. They are booted using 2.6.11.12, xen-2.0.6, Debian. The only daemons running on dom0 are : xend, smtp, quagga (ospf), portmap (nfs client), sshd. Memory usage at startup is aroung 30 MB. Dom0 reserved memory is 256 MB. The only things that happen on this server are domU''s start/stop (xm create, xm shutdown) and a

Hi Can someone help me figure out a way to compile a 2.4 kernel in a 2.6 system. Basically it keeps failing because it needs the genksyms package, which is provided in the modutils package from redhat, but obviously this isn''t presetn on the 2.6 kernel. I was wondering how the xen maintainers go about compiling their 2.4 kernel and 2.6 kernel. Do you do it on different systems then

If I try to ifup eth0, I get the following: Device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. DomU: Linux fedora1 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU #1 SMP Tue Jun 6 02:58:27 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux config: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xenU" #ramdisk="/boot/initrd-2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU.img" memory = 128 name = "fedora1" #dhcp = "dhcp" disk =

I have 3 machines, T60 thinkpad with e1000 NIC Dell PowerEdge 2950 with bnx2 NIC HP DL360 G4P with tg3 NIC All running xen 3.03 / 2.6.16.29-xen I have a netbootable image with 2.6.16.29-xenU. This image when it boots creates a vlan eth0.4002, and then tries to communicate on that interface to a central server. On the machines with e1000 an bnx2 NICs, this works fine. On the

As promised, here''s what I did to get iSCSI root running under XenU under Debian 3.1 (Sarge): Be running linux 2.6 under XenU. Build XenU with SCSI disk support (I did them as modules) Get linux-iscsi 4.0.1.8 from http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-iscsi/ Build it according to the instructions there (i found it a bit tricky) and install under your XenU Get iscsi-init 4.0.1 from

CC init/version.o LD init/built-in.o LD .tmp_vmlinux1 drivers/built-in.o: In function `vmcoreinfo_show'': /usr/src/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/drivers/xen/core/xen_sysfs.c:340: undefined reference to `vmcoreinfo_size_xen'' /usr/src/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/drivers/xen/core/xen_sysfs.c:340: undefined reference to `paddr_vmcoreinfo_xen'' make[4]: ** [.tmp_vmlinux1]

I ran some iperf tests today and it looks like the etherbridge is the limiting factor on throughput. In the beforetime, I saw great throughput to the VMs; over 800 Mbps. With the bridge, the numbers are in the 400s somewhere. Is this the speed I can expect from the bridge? Is there some tuning I should try, or another way to get more bandwidth into the VMs? This is with xen-2.0, 2.4.27-xen0

I tried building a 2.6.16 kernel from -unstable and also the -xenU kernel provided by FC5 and both will not run under 3.0-testing (changeset 8761:484a14acfc26). The 2.6.16 kernel will start and die with nothing of value in xend.log or xend-debug.log. If I run "xm create name -c" it will say it can''t open "/dev/pts/XX" and that is all the information I can

There is no CONFIG_SCSI to enable in xenU. Is there any reason for this? I want to try out iSCSI and obviously it needs scsi support. Or would I be better doing it in dom0 and exporting it? thanks James