similar to: Multi-Models

Hi Peter, is your patch against script.aculo.us mentioned in [1] gone any further in the last 3 months? -- alberto [1] http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2585 On 22/ago/06, at 00:35, Peter Michaux wrote: > > On 8/21/06, Bill Lazar <blazar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >> Before pounding my head on this particular rock I want to ask if >>

I am trying to create a screen like Google''s personalized home pages or start.com, i.e., with draggable sections, with the extra feature that the child items under the parent headings could be dragged and dropped from one parent heading to another. I have set up nested droppable sortables (dropOnEmpty=true) but the behavior is very inconsistent, i.e, parents do not become droppable

Dear alltogether, I am searching for a way to determine "effect size" in multi-level models by using lme(). Coming from Psychology, for ordinary OLS there are measures (for meta-analysis, etc.) like CohensD <- (mean_EG - mean_CG) / SD_pooled or (p)eta^2 <- SS_effect / (SS_effect + SS_error) I do not intend to lead a discussion of the usefulness of such measures as long as

Hello, I have a question about setting up a multi-level model in NLME. I have the P&B book, but I am still having trouble specifying the model. I am using the most recent version of NLME on R 1.3.0. I was referred to NLME after a previous query on multi-level models. Yet, I think part of my confusion is that I do not have a mixed model as far as I can see. I have random effects nested

Hi All, Kindly help me to sort this out.. I have devise sign up page. But now I want to integrate multi step registration. i.e) first, user will enter his/her email pwd and confirmation password. Will click on Next button where he fills in his personal details and on clicking Next button will show many subscription types. User will choose it from the list and then onlyuser should be created.

Dear wizaRds, I have a dataset to analyse which is causing me problems. It is a sample of parents in schools. First we had a population table of the schools in the country in question divided into five regions, and in each region we have an urban/rural split. The population Ns in these ten cells are known. Then three schools were drawn from each cell according to the Lahirie method, i.e with

From: Robert Hanson <roberth at abbacomm.net> > or should i be more specific with the question(s)? > the reason i ask is that i just dumped 2 gig dram in a basic > P4 Intel 3.0GHz box to play with. > regards and TIA, At more than 1GiB on Linux/x86, you must use a 4G+4G kernel (this is the default) to see more than 960MiB. This causes a signficant (10%+) performance hit. On

From: Chris Mauritz <chrism at imntv.com> > I agree completely. Unfortunately, even though I've killfiled the > biggest offender, I'm still getting a lot of the noise since people > continue to feed him. I assume the former is a reference to me. As far as the latter, you might re-think your singularity focus. As I've said before, you can't complain about me

Hi all, While tinkering with saturation instructions, I hit problems with the cost model calculations. The loop vectorizer cost model accumulates the individual TTI cost model of each instruction. For saturating arithmetic, this is a gross overestimate, since you have 2 sexts (inputs), 2 icmps + 2 selects (for the saturation), and a truncate (output); these all fold alway. With an intrinsic,

Hi all, I am using "lm" to fit some anova factor models with interactions. The default setting for my unordered factors is "treatment". I understand the resultant "lm" coefficients for one factors, but when it comes to the interaction term, I got confused. > options()$contrasts unordered ordered "contr.treatment"

From: Greg Knaddison <greg.knaddison at gmail.com> > Look - brevity is the soul of wit. It also keeps other folks on lists > from calling you a troll. The problem is that then the same people then start complaining about my "oversimplification." In fact, that's part of the problem here. I really _tried_ to make a recommendation without breaking down into the

i am working on a task management system for the company i work for. i just got the rails cookbook and am trying to use the section on creating a drag and drop sortable list. the tricky part is that my Task model references the User model in two different spots. i have one field for the creator of the task and another for the assignee. so in my Task model i have the following code: class

I want to update a form that contains logically grouped fields that are contained across multiple models. My models are: user [act_as_authenticated] profile [belongs to user] newsletter [belongs to user] Is there a way that I can setup my view so that in the controller I can write self.current_user = params[:user] self.current_user.save instead of having to specify each value individually for

I''m curious to see how others are dealing with the construction of multi-page forms. I can see a couple of ways to do this, each with their own advantages/disadvantates. Approach 1: * define one table with columns for each form entry. * define a method/view for each page, which only displays a subset of the fields. * submitting a page saves the data and moves on to the next page.

Dear all, I'm calling Winbugs (1.4.3) through R2WinBugs (2.1-18 coda_0.14-7) to fit a switching random walk model, but come up with an instant trap with the log only displaying 'check('. I will paste the trap with session info below; I'd be very grateful for any ideas. Couple of leads: 1. I presume the problem relates to the r package itself or the way I call bugs(), because I

hi, can someone advice how can I create a form with fileds from different models. also how to get the different models (objects) saved. thank you dani -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hi all, I have a multi model form setup in the classic Ryan Bates Complex forms style (railscasts.com/episodes/73) for my signup page. The two models in this are the Account model and the User model and this structure cannot be changed right now. The User model has password and password_conf attributes which are, unfortunately, taken alongwith the rest of the User''s attributes into an

I am using elasticsearch for querying in my application. Lets say there are 2 models Class Topic has_many :posts and Class Article has_many :comments I want to do a combined search on both these models and my query looks like: Tire.search [Article, Topic], {:load => {:include => [:posts, :comments]}} do |search| ... end This is where I encounter a problem. I get the Association

Hi folks. If I am indexing ModelA and ModelB and I want to search both of them, I usually just pick one arbitrarily and use it for #multi_search. Is there a slicker pattern, regarding from which model to invoke #multi_search? Can it be invoked directly from the Ferret library? Has anyone put together some sort of "dummy" search class? Thanks for any ideas. John

Hi, I''m creating a simple Ruby on Rails based CMS. It will support multiple languages. Therefore I''ve a table ''pages'' and a table ''page_translations''. The table ''page'' contains a title and body in the default language, the table ''page_translations'' contain a title and body for an other language. Now I