similar to: A new tutorial of writing a Reddit-like app in Rails

http://tinyurl.com/36pw6k Aaron swartz attacs Reddit brings it down --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

I hang out in the "DataHoarders" subreddit :-). https://old.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/8fxtxf/10gig_look_how_fast_i_am_smb_multichannel_hold_my/ Should be interesting for anyone doing performance work, although the smb.conf settings are somewhat "voodoo" (from old configs). Jeremy.

I figured I''d take to time to remind you guys of the r/puppet subreddit: <http://www.reddit.com/r/puppet> I''m hoping to see it grow more in the lead-up to PuppetConf, mostly because I want to see some interesting blog posts and such before September ;) Cheers - R. Tyler Croy -------------------------------------- Code: http://github.com/rtyler Chatter:

Dear Friends, I''d like to have a development suggestion for Rails. Rails is an amazing framework, and clearly it''s weakest link is that it relies on HTML in the end, which is not always the most appropriate GUI out there. Another option could be XUL. Mozilla-based browsers (Firefox) can run XUL apps right out of the box, others could use the XULRunner application. Here you can

Dear Friends, I started integrating XUL into Rails, however, I have some problems. The first problem is that I can open local XUL files with Firefox, but cannot open them through Rails/Webrick, Firefox says it does not recognize what it is. I''ve read the cookbookxul experiment and I know I have to play around with content-type, but a contoller action like def run_xul

I''m trying to implement acts_as_rateable to my Beast installation to give users the option to rate posts (like reddit). I chose acts_as_rateable as it supposedly easily allows reddit-type voting but I''m having some problems setting it up and the documentation seems outdated. (http://www.juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2006/07/05/acts-as-rateable-plugin/) So far, I''ve

> On Dec 3, 2007 5:19 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos at szeredi.hu> wrote: > > > Yes it is weird. I hope you can help me with this problem as sshfs is > > > so much simpler than nfs. > > > > Can you please do one more thing: start up sshfs normally, then on the > > server do a strace of the sftp-server process: > > > > strace -o /tmp/strace.log

On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 10:42:44AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:27 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:40:11AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > Looking at the ugly retry logic in virtiofs and have some questions. > > > > Hi Miklos, > > > > What are you thinking w.r.t

* Miklos Szeredi (miklos at szeredi.hu) wrote: > Looking at the ugly retry logic in virtiofs and have some questions. > First one is, where do these features come from: > > VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED > VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC > > I see that in virtiofs "packed" is off and "indirect" is on. Is this > guaranteed? I think the xdindirect is coming from

Hi All, I have a thin cliente here that i want to run asterisk: - National Semicondudor Geode GX1 266MHz Geode 266MHz single chip - NS Cx5530a Southbridge National Semiconductors SC2200 - NS PC97317 in chipset - 32MB Compact Flash - 64MB Ram - 10/100Mbps, Autosense 10/100Mbps, Autosense Realtek 8139C National DP83815 / DP83816 Some tip? I have a ide>flash

I: Program returns random data in a function E: libguestfs no-return-in-nonvoid-function guestmount.c:75 The function fuse_opt_add_opt_escaped has only one caller and a return code is not checked. Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf at aepfle.de> --- diff --git a/fuse/guestmount.c b/fuse/guestmount.c index 17e94ba..1eb0553 100644 --- a/fuse/guestmount.c +++ b/fuse/guestmount.c @@ -49,7 +49,7

ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com wrote: > > I believe that the right (ie ISO C standard recommended) way of doing > > this is: > > > > printf("[%d] [duration %" PRId64 "] %s\n", > > C99 only, Well, we are a little over 6 months away from 2009, so maybe, just maybe it might be time to start coding to the ten year old standard :-).

Dear LLVM community, I am affiliated with the design and development of the Pony<http:/www.ponylang.org> programming language, which was recently published and has since been discussed on hacker news<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9482483>, reddit [1]<http://www.reddit.com/r/ponylang>

Why do you want TM to work over samba? Not sure it is supported completely by Apple although they did have developer documentation on it at one time: https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/releasenotes/NetworkingInternetWeb/Time_Machine_SMB_Spec/ I did see this on reddit, but have not tried it personally:

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:36 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:49 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > >

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:36 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:49 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > >

On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 07:53:55PM +0800, piaojun wrote: > > > On 2019/9/6 19:52, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:36 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > >>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:49 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com> wrote:

LLVM Weekly - #130, Jun 27th 2016 ================================= If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/130>. Welcome to the one hundred and thirtieth issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:12:02PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Git tree for this version is available here: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git#virtiofs-v5 > > Only post patches that actually add virtiofs (virtiofs-v5-base..virtiofs-v5). > > I've folded the series from Vivek and fixed a couple of TODO comments > myself. AFAICS two

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:40:11AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Looking at the ugly retry logic in virtiofs and have some questions. Hi Miklos, What are you thinking w.r.t cleanup of retry logic. As of now we put requests in a list and retry later with the help of a worker. Other option will probably be block the submitter if queue is full. Make it sleep, wake up after a while and retry