similar to: Eth0 in Promisc mode

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "Eth0 in Promisc mode"

2007 Mar 20
4
blktap howto
hi, i''m trying move from file: based disk to tap:aio but things don''t work i have centos4 dom0 with centos4 domU xen 3.0.4-testing changeset: 13138:d401cb96d8a0 self compiled [root@xen linux-2.6.16.38-xen]# grep XEN_BLKDEV_TAP .config CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_TAP=m config disk = [ ''file:/var/lib/xen/test.img,hda1,w'',
2006 Sep 26
5
powernow-k8: Processor cpuid 681 not supported
I am running 2.6.18-1.2693.fc6xen and I am receiving this message powernow-k8: Processor cpuid 681 not supported anyone know if xen works on processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 8 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Prosussor stepping : 1 cpu MHz : 1994.985 cache size : 256 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no
2006 Sep 26
5
powernow-k8: Processor cpuid 681 not supported
I am running 2.6.18-1.2693.fc6xen and I am receiving this message powernow-k8: Processor cpuid 681 not supported anyone know if xen works on processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 8 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Prosussor stepping : 1 cpu MHz : 1994.985 cache size : 256 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no
2009 Apr 22
0
virsh can not connect, but virt-manager does
Hi, i am having problems with virsh utility. I have installed 3 KVM virtual OS-es on top of CentOS 5.3 i386 (with kernel 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus from 5.2, necessary on AMD/ATI MB I have). I have compiled KVM modules from lfarkash-es sorce rpm's and libvirt and managers are recompiled from Fedoras repositories. Problem is following: Guests are installed with virt-manager and
2007 Oct 24
9
how to press ctrl+alt+del on windows2003
hello, i just installed windows2003 as domU on Xen 3.0.3 using virt-manager. after finished install, now i can see windows login screen. but i can''t send ctrl+alt+del signal to guestOS which is windows2003. is there any key map for this? thank you. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2007 Jul 16
4
No adsl in dom0 - Fedora 7
Hi, I am having problems establishing an adsl connection in dom0 (but ONLY in dom0, without xen everything is ok). Following is my setup/situation: 1. Installed clean Fedora 7 (with virtualization option selected) 2. Booted with the non-xen kernel & setup adsl. Adsl connection works without any problems. 3. Rebooted with xen kernel into dom0. 4. adsl connection can no longer be activated
2006 Sep 11
3
Is RAMDISK required for domU boot?
Hi, I found one weird thing: I heard RAMDISK is not required for domU, but it seems I have to add RAMDISK to my domU config file, otherwiese the domU will hang up when it is booting. Please see the message below, the domU booting hangs up after "Continuing..." Does anyone have any clue for this issue? BTW, xen-friendly glibc is already installed. Thanks, Liang ---Begin of domU
2007 Oct 01
16
are Xen 3.1.0 kernels CVE-2007-4573 vulnerable
Does anyone know if the Xen 3.1.0 kernels as distributed in the "open source" tarballs (x86_64 version) are vulnerable to the recently-announced vulnerability CVE-2007-4573? IF so, is there any plan to release patched tarballs anytime soon? Thanks Steve Timm -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Steven C. Timm, Ph.D (630) 840-8525 timm@fnal.gov
2006 Jul 28
0
no PROMISC mode in ip link show
Hi When I start arpwatch or tcpdump the Ethernet card eth0 goes into promiscuous mode but I cannot see it with ifconfig eth0 or ip link show. The only way I can see it is when I looked at dmesg. Ifconfig uses the old style IOFLAG way to determine this but looking into ip code this is supposed to work even with newer kernels (I''m on 2.6.17 now with the latest iproute package) I found
2006 Aug 02
0
no PROMISC mode ..
Hi, I''m not convinced I''m facing a bug, I was reading some code and also reading some threads and finally reached this conclusion, please let me know if it''s not clear enough and also if you don''t agree : - The case it shows the flag with iproute is because it''s using a single flag set. That was working on kernels linux <2.1.x. (2.0 etc.)
2002 Jul 06
1
PROMISC mode
Hello All, While implementing CBQ for my network card , i found it has PROMISC mode enabled by default while installing RedHat-7.3 . What is it ? Is any way related to security. Regards Vanitha
2003 Nov 20
0
newer iproute2: no support for "ip link set dev $DEV promisc on"
Greetings all, I have tried to find a discussion of the removal of support for the PROMISC interface flag with the iproute2 tools. - it used to work (iproute2-2.2.4-$ANCIENT) - there''s a comment about it in the iproute docs [0] - (un-)setting the flag with ifconfig still works Can anybody point me to the discussion (linux-net, maybe?) where support for setting the PROMISC flag
2006 Apr 05
2
bind() fd 6, family 28, port 123 at boot time
Hi, looking at the messages i see errors with ntp everytime i reboot my server: shiva2# tail /var/log/messages Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 kernel: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 ntpd[385]: ntpd 4.2.0-a Tue Mar 14 04:43:54 UTC 2006 (1) Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 ntpd[385]: bind() fd 6, family 28, port 123, addr fe80:1::20b:cdff:fe42:3d63, in6_is_addr_multicast=0 flags=0
2007 Oct 23
6
Any Xen kernel based on something newer than 2.6.18 ?
Hello all, I''m trying to get my servers to work with Xen, but as I use sata2, it looks like only a recent kernel will do the job. But unferotunately, ony and official 2.6.8 is provided, which doesn''t boot at all on those machines. I''ve tried ubuntu''s 2.6.22-xen, but ti looks very buggy. Where could we find patches for 2.6.22/23 to add Xen? How could I gete a
2009 Jan 15
5
why vlan tag is retained in promisc mode
In current Crossbow''s implementation, vlan tag seems to be unconditionally retained for promisc mode listener even when MAC_OPEN_FLAGS_TAG_DISABLE is not specified. I saw comments in mac_rx_deliver() saying that this is deliberately designed like this. I''m wondering why we design it like this (choose not to respect MAC_OPEN_FLAGS_TAG_DISABLE flag for promisc mode listener)? Or
2004 Aug 28
4
RE: Promisc routing
> From: "Roy" <roy@xxx.lt> > > I want to set interface to promisc mode and do all routing with iptables. > Is it somehow possible? as I see now kernel do not pass everything to > ipables. > > Basicaly I want to ignore ethernet addess and use only ip for routing. > > I suppose this may require writting special kernel driver or it > is possible > in
2012 Dec 12
43
[PATCH 00/37] [RFC] revamped modeset locking
Hi all, First thing first: It works, I now no longer have a few dropped frames every 10s on my testbox here with the pageflip i-g-t tests. Random notes: - New design has per-crtc locks to protect the crtc input-side (pageflip, cursor) for r/w and the output state of the crtc (mode, dpms) as read-only. It also required completely revamped fb lifecycle management, those are now refcounted
2010 Mar 11
0
Xen problem network dom0
Hello, I''ve install Xen on a Debian Lenny 5.04 and after reboot on my xen machine I can''t have the same configuration that documentation. ************************************************************************ *********** Command "uname -r" = 2.6.26-2-xen-686 ************************************************************************ ************ Command
2009 Mar 26
2
PRI dropping #2
Hey, I wrote yesterday about PRI dropping, which turned out to just be a regular reset of unused B-channels. This time there's a real issue. As noted earlier I have an ISDN-30 connection, a Digium TE-121 with VPMADT032 echo cancellation. These are my configurations files: == /etc/zaptel.conf loadzone=dk defaultzone=dk span=1,1,0,css,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 == ==
2005 Jan 02
1
Dnat problems with adsl-box
Hello! So i got this problem. I have a debian sarge (with 2.6 kernel) box with shorewall up and network something like this: (net-ip)adsl-router(10.0.0.2)->(10.0.0.5)debian(192.168.0.1)->(192.168.0.x)lan-machines Everything works just great but i cant get port forwarding to work. shorewall show nat shows the traffic (to port 2002) but the machine (192.168.0.3) isnt getting it.. I have