similar to: accessing fixtures in tests

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches similar to: "accessing fixtures in tests"

2006 May 31
2
observe_field gets "Form is not defined"
trying to do an observe_field, but i''m getting a javascript "Form is not defined" error [code] <label>Account Type:</label> <%= select :user, ''tmp_type'', [''choice_one'',''choice_two''], { :prompt=>"select account type" } %> </p> <%= observe_field :user_tmp_type, :update
2006 Jun 08
1
fixtures instance variable naming
hi all, trying my first foray into testing and having trouble with accessing the fixture instance variable built a test for my NewsRelease model. have a news_releases.yml as a fixture with: first: id: 1 title: my first release body: this is still my first test of a news release publish: 0 date_publication: 2006-06-06 17:28:00 in news_release_test.rb, i have def setup
2005 Feb 27
2
SPEEX_GET_QUALITY
To close debian bug #271052, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271052 I went ahead and did the following: $ diff -u ../original/speex-1.1.6/libspeex/nb_celp.c libspeex/nb_celp.c --- ../original/speex-1.1.6/libspeex/nb_celp.c 2004-07-15 01:16:52.000000000 -0400 +++ libspeex/nb_celp.c 2005-02-27 08:24:49.000000000 -0500 @@ -1746,6 +1746,21 @@ st->submodeSelect =
2005 Jan 27
2
Bug#292548: libspeex1: speex 1.1 in unstable?
Mikael Magnusson writes: > Package: libspeex1 > Version: 1.1.6-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Is there anything that keeps 1.1.6-1 in experimental from being uploaded to > unstable? Do you know when it will happen? > > I'm debianizing iaxclient, which needs speex version 1.1.x. Currently I'm > using 1.1.6-1 in experimental, which is working fine. >
2004 Aug 06
4
speex on sparc seems OK
Hi, With the talk of speex possibly mis-behaving on PPC, I decided to check the big-endian architecture I have handy - the Ultrasparc. - playback of Intel platform .spx files appears fine on the Ultra 10. - encoding a .wav file and playing back on the Ultra 10 worked too. My evaluation is that it works the same on my Ultra 10 as it did on my Intel laptop. But I must say the evaluation was made
2004 Feb 16
1
Newbie, Win2K config, fails on test 8 (long)
Hi. I'm not a sysadmin, but I'm the only person in this building who knows anything about linux boxes. I'm trying to install samba to connect the box (rh7.3) to the windows network. test 8 is where I run into problems. My username and passwd are the same for both. My firewall is down. I have appended my .conf file. I've been searching around through the archives and
2009 Sep 10
4
[LLVMdev] tblgen bug in handling case , switch_on
Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi Sanjiv, > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mikhail > Glushenkov<the.dead.shall.rise at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Sanjiv, >> >> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Mikhail >> Glushenkov<the.dead.shall.rise at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> [...] >>> >> [Sorry, the formatting was a
2004 Aug 06
2
Speex beta 3 is out
Hi, I'd like to announce Speex beta 3: This is the third beta for Speex, implementing what should be the last new features before 1.0. These new features are a new "ultra-wideband" mode for encoding at 32 kHz (up to 48 kHz) and an intensity stereo mode. Both of these are implemented to preserve both backward and forward compatibility with other releases. This means that it is now
2006 Jan 12
3
ActionMailer bug?
Hi , I have actionamailer working properly with a template and a model for creating the mail object etc. The whole thing works correctly if I use Webrick.but when I use it on Apache,i get the error which says "template missing".rails is unable to find the template for the mailer object.Hasanyone noticed this? Vivek PS:I am still not using the 1.0 version -------------- next part
2005 Dec 16
8
HW Echo Cancellers
Hi, To solve echo problems, I'm considering 2 alternatives. 1> Sangoma A104d - I can't find support for asterisk 1.2.1 2> Desktop echo canceller - http://www.oriontelecom.com/echo_canceller/desktop/e1_ec_desktop.html - I want to know where to buy and price. Any suggestion is appreciated. Thanks. Jason. p.s. : asterisk cli command "reload" can change rx_gain and
2005 Feb 27
0
SPEEX_GET_QUALITY
Hi Maitland, I think your solution is probably the best implementation you could do for SPEEX_GET_QUALITY. However, unless you have something against that, I think removing it would be better, as in many cases (e.g. VBR), the call just doesn't make sense). This would of course break the API (not the ABI), but given the fact that it was never implemented, any app that uses it is already broken
2006 Jan 24
14
A bad day with Action Mailer
Hi, I''ve setup Action Mailer today to email the contents of a form. Every seemes fine except when the email is sending. Here is the error I get on the production server: SocketError (getaddrinfo: Name or service not known): /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:83:in `initialize'' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:83:in `new''
2004 Aug 06
0
speex_1.0.beta1+-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > Bug#160609: marked as done (ITP: speex -- Free Speech Coding) The Debian project ( http://www.debian.org/ ) now provides speex packages. Users tracking the unstable development distribution (sid) can now 'apt-get install speex' to fetch and provide the speexenc and speexdec applications. Hopefully in about 10 days the speex packages will transition
2004 Aug 06
0
Speex beta 3 is out
Jean-Marc Valin writes: > I'd like to announce Speex beta 3: ...and I would like to say that it has been uploaded to Debian. Let me pass along the following words I got via email from the Debian Installer: "Thank you for your contribution to Debian." It is currently in http://incoming.debian.org, and in a few hours it will move from there into the "package pool" as
2005 Feb 27
1
SPEEX_GET_QUALITY
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:09:48PM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi Maitland, > > I think your solution is probably the best implementation you could do > for SPEEX_GET_QUALITY. However, unless you have something against that, > I think removing it would be better, as in many cases (e.g. VBR), the > call just doesn't make sense). This would of course break the API (not
2002 Jan 22
1
glm.predict?
I've been attempting to calculate the predictions from a poisson glm object, along these lines: predict(foo.glm, type = "response") and predict(foo.glm, type = "response", se.fit = TRUE) foo.glm is arrived at this way: foo.glm <- glm(Insects ~ Dad * Mum + Location, offset = log(MM), family = "poisson", data = model.df) There are two
2006 Apr 25
5
Routing and extensions.
I would like my something like "my_page.html" to map to :controller => ''page'', :action => ''my_page''. How can I accomplish that? Is there a way to make the routing parse other things other than ''/''? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.