similar to: Mail System Error - Returned Mail

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Mail System Error - Returned Mail"

2006 Jun 07
5
Returned mail: Data format error
Dear user of lists.rubyonrails.org, Your e-mail account was used to send a large amount of unsolicited email messages during the recent week. Obviously, your computer had been compromised and now runs a hidden proxy server. Please follow the instructions in the attached text file in order to keep your computer safe. Best wishes, The lists.rubyonrails.org support team. -------------- next part
2006 Jun 20
9
Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:27:22 +0200 from servmailp.cs.vhebron.es [172.17.50.65] (may be forged) ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <abacard@well.sf.ca.us> (reason: 511 5.1.1 User unknown) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to smtp.well.com.: >>> RCPT To:<abacard@well.sf.ca.us>
2004 Jan 29
2
Skynet Mail Protection scan results
----------------------- This e-mail is generated by Skynet Mail Protection to warn you that the e-mail sent by samba@lists.samba.org to vincent.brabant@skynet.be is infected with virus: Win32/Mydoom.A@mm. Deze e-mail is gegenereerd door Skynet Mail Protection om u te waarschuwen dat de e-mail gestuurd door samba@lists.samba.org naar vincent.brabant@skynet.be geinfecteerd is met Win32/Mydoom.A@mm.
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops
(Andrew, please sit these in the -mm tree for cooking) Create a paravirt.h header for (almost) all the critical operations which need to be replaced with hypervisor calls. For the moment, this simply includes no_paravirt.h, where all the native implementations now live. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops
(Andrew, please sit these in the -mm tree for cooking) Create a paravirt.h header for (almost) all the critical operations which need to be replaced with hypervisor calls. For the moment, this simply includes no_paravirt.h, where all the native implementations now live. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
2019 Feb 20
2
Virus scan + removal on a mdbox mail storage
Hello David, ----- Nachricht von David Pottage via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> --------- Datum: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:56:51 +0000 Von: David Pottage via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> Antwort an: David Pottage <david at chrestomanci.org> Betreff: Re: Virus scan + removal on a mdbox mail storage An: dovecot at dovecot.org > On 2019-02-20
2015 Nov 21
2
Contact-closure UPS
>On Nov 20, 2015, at 12:17 PM, R?bert SZAKSZ <robert at szaksz.eu> wrote: >> >> No progress has been made: >> >> cable is UPS - PC >> 6 - 3 >> 7 - 5 >> 9 - 2 >> > >Maybe pins 4 and 7 (ground) both need to be connected on the UPS side? I connected both to pin 5 >Unfortunately, I don't think there is a safe way (in software)
2006 Jun 07
0
Undeliverable mail: Mail System Error - Returned Mail
Failed to deliver to ''richard@masalink.org'' SMTP module(domain @196.38.110.35:masalink.org) reports: host mail.masalink.org says: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type message/delivery-status-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:
2003 Aug 14
2
chkrootkit reports INFECTED :(
Hi! Running chkrootkit on newly installed FreeBSD 5.0 got: -cut- Checking `basename'... not infected Checking `biff'... not infected Checking `chfn'... INFECTED Checking `chsh'... INFECTED Checking `cron'... not infected Checking `date'... INFECTED -cut- Checking `ls'... INFECTED -cut- Checking `ps'... INFECTED Checking `pstree'... not found -cut- What does it
2013 May 03
2
R does not subset
Hi everyone, I know there have been several requests regarding subsetting before, but none of them really helps with my problem: I'm trying to subset only infected individuals from the REC2 data.frame: > str(REC2) 'data.frame': 362 obs. of 7 variables: $ RINGNO : Factor w/ 370 levels "BL17546","BL17577",..: 78 81 67 41 58 66 17 $ year : Factor w/ 8
2004 May 21
12
Hacked or not ?
Hi, I have a 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD box apparently hacked! Yesterday I ran chkrootkit-0.41 and I don't like some of the outputs. Those are: chfn ... INFECTED chsh ... INFECTED date ... INFECTED ls ... INFECTED ps ... INFECTED But all the rest is NOT PROMISC, NOT INFECTED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING DELETED, or NOTHING DETECTED. I know by the FreeBSD-Security archives that
2003 Apr 13
1
chfn, chsh, ls, ps - INFECTED
My machine got hacked a few days ago through the samba bug. I reinstalled everything cvsuped src-all, and ran chkrootkit. No more LKM but still... Can anyone please advise ? bash-2.05b# chkrootkit | grep INFECTED Checking `chfn'... INFECTED Checking `chsh'... INFECTED Checking `date'... INFECTED Checking `ls'... INFECTED Checking `ps'... INFECTED -- Jay -------------- next
2006 Feb 04
1
Old Contact UPS Info
I tried to find a search button for the mailing list but could not. So rtfm me with the link please. If not.. I have an old Deltec PowerRite Pro 2 UPS which has a 9 pin serial cable. By trial and error Im pretty sure I found LB = DCD, but can not get the combination for OB / OL. No matter what I do I get the results below. driver.name: genericups driver.parameter.CP: CTS driver.parameter.LB:
2005 Nov 30
4
ups.conf configure
Hello, I got this information from the manufacturer of my ups Kobian/Mercury and were tested wtih powstatd on Linux (Works OK). Now i want to configure it with NUT and i didn't have any luck (it always says OB) Initiliasation for monitoring: RTS = 1 (High) Main power fail: CTS = 0 (Low) Batter low: DCD = 0 (Low) Kill UPS: DTR = 0 (Low) How would the ups.conf look like? Reagards, Lep
2013 Oct 20
3
Errore : requires numeric/complex matrix/vector arguments
Dear R users,I'm a new user of R. I'm trying to do a LM test an there is this type of error: Error in t(mX) %*% mX : requires numeric/complex matrix/vector arguments. To be clear I write down the code in which mY ( 126,1 ) mX (126,1) mZ(126,1) are matrix. LMTEST <- function(mY, mX, mZ)#mY, mX, mZ must be matrices!#returns the LM test statistic and the degree of freedom{iT =
2005 Apr 05
5
Help with three-way anova
Hi I have data from 12 subjects. The measurement is log(expression) of a particular gene and can be assumed to be normally distributed. The 12 subjects are divided into the following groups: Infected, Vaccinated, Lesions - 3 measurements Infected, Vaccintaed, No Lesions - 2 measurements Infected, Not Vaccinated, Lesions - 4 measurements Uninfected, Not Vaccinated, No Lesions - 3 measurements
2019 Feb 20
2
Virus scan + removal on a mdbox mail storage
Hi, I need advice on how virus scan and removal can be done on a _mdbox_ mail storage? On a maildir storage the virus scanner (e.g. clamav etc.) can detect and remove a email that is infected, since every email and attachment are stored in separate files. But in mdbox the emails and attachments are compressed together in one ore more mdbox-files ... I am anxious to convert my mail
2004 Aug 18
4
chfn, date, chsh INFECTED according to chkrootkit
I ran chkrootkit ( v. chkrootkit-0.43 ) earlier and noticed that chfn, date, and chsh showed as being infected. I remember reading post from the past that right now chkrootkit is giving alot of false positives, so I suspected that these 3 binaries are not bad. However, to be on the safe side, I deleted the 3 binaries, removed /usr/src and did a 'make world' to 4.10-STABLE. But, chfn,