similar to: iptables iprange match

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "iptables iprange match"

2005 Oct 20
1
2.4.30-xenU kernel / openswan 1.0.9
Hi list!: I found this error trying to compile the kernel 2.4.30 after apply the patches from openswan-1.0.9. The error ocurrs using: kernel 2.4.30 (xenU kernel) iptables 1.3.3 patch-o-matic-ng-20051010 openswan 1.0.9 the menu fails going to netfilter configuration options [root@xenkbunk linux-2.4.30-xenUOSW-1.0.9]# make CC=gcc33 ARCH=xen menuconfig rm -f include/asm ( cd include ; ln -sf
2011 Aug 29
2
[Bug 742] New: ip6tables "-m iprange" ipv6 range detection
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742 Summary: ip6tables "-m iprange" ipv6 range detection Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: SuSE Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:
2010 Mar 09
2
[Bug 639] New: iptables iprange
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Summary: iptables iprange Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: paulo.santos at
2011 Mar 18
6
[Bug 711] New: iptables -m iprange causes unknown error
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711 Summary: iptables -m iprange causes unknown error Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at
2005 Jan 11
0
shorewall iprange tweak
I often find myself doing, whois some.damned.ip.address and then copying and pasting the address range for the miscreant in question, and doing, shorewall iprange x.x.x.x-y.y.y.y with the aim to drop the entire range. My one minor complaint is that I often have to edit out the spaces between the hyphen when copying and pasting the address range returned by whois. I tweaked the shorewall
2014 May 07
1
[Bug 922] New: iprange: --ports is not suppported
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=922 Summary: iprange: --ports is not suppported Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy: anarey
2004 Aug 12
5
shorewall iprange problem
Perhaps someone can help me understand why this is happening. I''m trying to write a script using ''shorewall iprange'' to parse some ip ranges into subnets so that i can place them into the blocklist. I keep getting an error when i run the script though. Here is the script: #!/bin/csh foreach i (`cat ipranges`) shorewall iprange $i >>
2007 Aug 13
4
Problem with iprange in shorewall 4.0.2
Hi, I have the following problem while activating this rule entry using shorewall-shell: ACCEPT:notice:rul WAN:139.x.x.226 INT:139.x.x.153-139.x.x.156 udp 1024:65535 1024:65535 "-m iprange" in front of "--dst-range" is missing in the activation command. The logging entry (above) is set correct. Below is the debug output. Thanks Regards Günter + case $level in +
2005 Dec 08
8
kudzu - fedora core 3
Hi list!: A question about the refinement of the configuration: Always when I start a domain kudzu (hardware detection daemon) ask me for remove hardware. I answer yes, but in the next boot kudzu ask again. I''m guessing that kudzu is asking for remove the «real» drivers that are inside the domU because the domainU was created copying the dom0 system in the domU. How can I deal with
2004 Dec 14
3
make check-all failed on SLES8 for x86_64
Hi all, I've only now noticed that on our Opteron boxes running Suse Enterprise Server 8 that R-2.0.1 did not pass make chek-all. It bombed in tests/lapack.R at: > eigenok <- function(A, E, Eps = 1000 * .Machine$double.eps) { V <- E$vect lam <- E$values stopifnot(abs(A %*% V - V %*% diag(lam)) < Eps, .... [TRUNCATED] > Ceigenok <- function(A, E, Eps =
2007 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.0 / GCC 3.4
Hi there, Is it possible to use GCC 3.4 with LLVM 2.0? I tried to compile GCC 3.4 with LLVM 2.0 and get following error message: /scratch/spa_llvm-2.0/llvm-gcc3.4-1.9.source/build/gcc/xgcc -B/ scratch/spa_llvm-2.0/llvm-gcc3.4-1.9.source/build/gcc/ -B/scratch/ spa_llvm-2.0/llvm-gcc3.4-1.9.source/install/i386-pc-solaris2.11/bin/ - B/scratch/spa_llvm-2.0/llvm-gcc3.4-1.9.source/install/i386-pc-
2008 Aug 12
0
configure for ARM Linux
Hi, all, Samba version 3.2.1 tar ball is downloaded. Next, I'm facing how to configure it for ARM Linux, but it's not so smooth for me. : ( The following is my environment information: 1. Development environment : Linux PC 2. Cross compiler : scratchbox/compilers/arm-gcc3.4-uclibc0.9.28 3. Configure options : (almost of them are googled) $ ./configure --without-krb5
2003 Jul 07
1
Shorewall 1.4.6 Beta 2
Changes since Beta 1: Problems Corrected: 1. Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a "-" were mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule. New Features: 1. The limit of 256 addresses for an address range has been removed. Shorewall now decomposes the range into an optimal set of network/host addresses (see also the
2006 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Actually, my request for more info in the "Getting Started" had some > hidden questions, as I don't know the answer to them :) So to be a > little more clear, here are the two I had: > > Does the gcc4 no longer need the "fixheaders" script that the gcc3.4 > frontends uses? > > Is it possible to install both the gcc4 and
2006 Jun 05
3
How to configure two NICs on a DomU?
Hi, When I install Oracle RAC on Xen VM, some problem occurred. How can I configure two NICs on a Xen''s DomU. You know, RAC''s installation requires two NICs on a node. I am a newbie about Xen. Please give me some advice. Thanks. Yaqiong lee Beijing,China -----邮件原件----- 发件人: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] 代表
2006 Aug 25
4
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Chris Lattner wrote: > Patches welcome. Please send a patch, or even just some suggested > text, and we'll be happy to include it. Remember that the people who > usually end up writing the FAQ's already know all the answers, so it's > hard for us to see things from fresh perspectives sometimes :) > > -Chris > Actually, my request for more info in the
2004 Dec 21
2
Defining "trusted" hosts/nets on a single interface system
Ok, I give up. I tried, really hard, before asking but I must be the most stupid shorewall user on the planet :( My laptop runs a single eth0 interface and knows Net and Firewall as zones and the default "inbound" policies are Net->Any DROP and >ny->Any REJECT. Now at home I have my trusted 192.168.174.240/29 subnet which hosts my very trusted 192.168.174.242 host and I
2006 Aug 23
2
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Hello, It looks like the "Getting Started" is missing some info about the gcc 4.0 frontend. Since it doesn't follow the setup of the cfrontend/gcc3.4 package, a couple sections describing the front end don't cover the gcc4 package. Here are the couple things I'd wish could be fleshed out a bit more: Under "Getting Started Quickly (A Summary)", it'd be nice
2005 Dec 03
5
XenLinux 2.4.30 - help
Hello, I''m trying to build XenLinux 2.4.30 on debian. I get the following error for make linux24 make[2]: *** No rule to make target `skbuff.c'',needed by `/usr/src/xen-2.0/linux-2.4.30-xen0/include/linux/modules/skbuff.ver''. Stop. Could somebody help me resolve this error. Or if this is some problem with the system configuration that I''m using, could
2003 Jul 31
2
mysql323 + gcc on 4.8-s
4.8-stable as/of jun 9th (update scheduled) has gcc version, 2.95.4 i'm building mod_php3 (some local stuff needs a php3 processor) with mysql support. using the mysql323 client/server from ports. mysql (which i know i've built before on older stable's) reports gcc can't convert longlong to something or other... basicly saying i need a newer compiler. i'm installing gcc33