similar to: promiscous mode on all interfaces?

Hello, Is it normal that eth0 in domain0 is in promisc mode ? [root@vmaster ~]# ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0B:CD:4D:C4:8A inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Bcast:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask: 255.255.255.248 inet6 addr: fe80::20b:cdff:fe4d:c48a/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3602633 errors:0

Hey folks! I want to add a CentOS 5.2 domU to an existing server (Fedora 8) which was setup by another company. The Dom0 does not provide any other services but a BIND-DHCP-server (they deleted dnsmasq and installed bind). Don''t ask my why they did that. My new DomU is connected to eth0, which is a bridge. BIND also listens on eth0 to serve other machines. I start the install of centos

Hi, Can someone interpret how HVM guest communicate with domain0, as i know, H VM can not use event channel directly, is the platform-pci offer a way to solve this? Please try to explain concretely, for example : 1.how does HVM send a event to domain0, how does domain0 catch this event, and assoicate it with a handler 2.the opposite direction, how does domain0 send event to HVM guest? Does it

In current Crossbow''s implementation, vlan tag seems to be unconditionally retained for promisc mode listener even when MAC_OPEN_FLAGS_TAG_DISABLE is not specified. I saw comments in mac_rx_deliver() saying that this is deliberately designed like this. I''m wondering why we design it like this (choose not to respect MAC_OPEN_FLAGS_TAG_DISABLE flag for promisc mode listener)? Or

Hi all, I am running the current xen-unstable and had the following error message when trying to create domain1. # ./xenctl script -f/etc/xen-mynewdom Domain defaults: name XenoLinux size 98304 vifs 1 domainImage /boot/xenolinux.gz domainInitRD null rootDevice /dev/hda5 rootArgs rw usrDevice null NWIP

I have a really basic question (I think). We have two boxes connected to a lan segment on a hub. One is a Windows box running "Show Traffic", the other is a CentOS 5 Linux box running "ntop". Both boxes should be able to sniff all of the traffic on that hub (not a switch). The Windows box does just fine, Show Traffic is able to display traffic destined for other boxes

Hi all. I have still network issues. I''m now able to connect two virtual domains with a bridge defined in domain0. But this is not what I want. I don''t want to affect domain0 in any way what means no network connections between the domain0 and the virtual domains. I just want to define a ''cross-over cable'' connecting eth0 of the first domU with the eth0 of the

Hi everyone! I have the following setup: domain0 |-domU1 |-domU2 |-domU3 I am running this with libvirt on a XEN server. Right now the server is connected to our office network, but later it will be in a hosted environment. I need domU1 and domU3 to have a public IP, and all of the domUs and the dom0 should have an internal IP address to communicate with each other. So this is what I would like

Dear, "Xenoppix-x86-64(Xen3.0.2+KNOPPIX-x86_64-5.0.1) CD size" is released. http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html Xenoppix-x86-64 exploits latest CPU (Intel Core2 Duo and AMD Athlon64). * Xenoppix-x86-64 boots both X86 and X86_64 linux kernel on HVM of Xen. * Xenoppix-x86-64 looks like KNOPPIX but all packages are replaced for X86_64. * Xenoppix-x86-64 also

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:55:04AM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:43:17PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> >> Yeah, but why did it happen when i directly issue guest VM

Hi, Jeremy Since now the pv_ops domain0 is approaching, we are considering to port the dom0 power management related code, or more specifically, the Cx/Px ACPI info parsing code, to pv_ops domain0 tree, so that people can utilize Xen power management capability (Cx/PX) under pv_ops domain0. This RFC is a draft version for comments. === Overview === Requirement: Xen hypervisor need Cx/Px ACPI

I inherited a xen server that is setup to have all the VM images hosted on an iSCSI mounted NAS array. We been experiencing a random (about every 2-3 days) issue where xen would crash all the VMs, leaving nothing but the Domain0 running. What appears to be happening is something causes the iSCI mount to hiccup. Running "vgchange -a y" and restarting all the VMs brings everything up.

Hi, next step, # dmesg | grep pciback Bootdata ok (command line is root=/dev/sda2 ro console=tty0 pciback.hide=(0000:02:05.0)(0000:02:06.0)(0000:02:07.0)(0000:02:08.0)(0000:02:09.0) ) Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda2 ro console=tty0 pciback.hide=(0000:02:05.0)(0000:02:06.0)(0000:02:07.0)(0000:02:08.0)(0000:02:09.0) Unknown boot option

Hello, I have been using the bridging facilities provided by Linux (vanilla 2.6.7 SMP with UML skas host patch applied) to bridge a regular physical ethernet network (on interface eth0) with a virtual network (on interface tap0, cf uml_switch, http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/networking.html). A couple of virtual machines (run using user-mode linux, a tool that enables you to run linux

Hello. I''m new to the list and I hope this is not a FAQ. I searched the archives and didn''t find an answer... Quick question : Is there a limitation if the vif code cutting at 1500 bytes ?? I''m trying to implement an IPv6 router/Firewall (2 XenU) Xen 2.0.6, Linux 2.6 is used on xen0 and XenU. The physical machine has 2 interfaces, eth0 (which is connected to an

Dear, We released New Xenoppix (based on Xen3.0, CD size). Detail HP http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html 670MB knoppix_v4.0.2CD_20050923_xen3.0-20060104+IPAFont_cdsize.iso --------------------------------- # New Features * Xen is updated to version 3.0. * Host-Xenoppix(Knoppix on Domain0) boots Guest-Xenoppix(Knoppix on DomainU) with same kernel and same Root

Hi all, To boot a Xen from grub, we normally use a Xen kernel and a domain0 kernel & initrd.img as its modules. Now, I want to merge these three files into one single kernel file, then I can boot it without modules. I am doing this because a simulator environment only has one file entry for the kernel. Do you guys have some hints on how to do that? BTW, I can merge the domain0 kernel &

Hi, I have the following configuration for Xen 3.0 OS: Fedora core 5.0 Processor: AMD Athelon(tm ) XP 2400+ RAM: 1GB I have installed the following RPM into this machine. xen-3.0.1-4.i386 kernel-xen0-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5.i686 kernel-xenU-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5.i686 After rebooting the machine..i have choose the Domain0 option to boot in domain0. But it show''s some hardware

I have a question about memory. I have 8GB of RAM on a Dell PE 1850(usb disabled kernel, cos it gets locked up on heavy I/O). My domain0 has only 2 gigs of memory. I have 2 guest domains 512 each. Now when i try to create a 3rd guest domain of 512, xen wont let me do it. My confusion is "Is 4G the max amount of memory a domain can get/ or is 4G the max amout of cumulative memory all the

My domain0 cannot go to Internet while domainU can ,anyone one know how to solve it? I post the information I get when typing "ifconfig -a,route -n ,brctl show." here is the link :http://pastebin.ca/1506798.Anyone who can help me? -- God more,self less. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com