similar to: Oracle 9i R2 RAC with OCFS2

Hi, I'm setting up a 2-node Oracle 9i RAC on OCFS2. But I have some problems with understanding how the shared Oracle_Home is being used. For instance there is the *$ORACLE_HOME/oracm/admin/cmcfg.ora* file. The $ORACLE_HOME is on the SAN so the 2 nodes have access to this file. How will the settings then be done per node? Is there a guide/tutorial/howto for installing Oracle 9i RAC on

I have been a user of OCFS2 for quite some time now (2 years or so) and a user of Oracle RAC for several years as well. My usage of these two is completely independent though, the cluster filesystem is for application level usage (web servers, etc.) only because RAC can manage its own shared storage directly. And that brings me to my observation/question... I keep seeing a lot of messages

Hello All, I have few questions around our use of ocfs1/2 for archive logs on 10G RAC. Is there an article out there describing why fragmentation is a special concern for ocfs1/2? Are there ways to remove fragmentation short of rebuilding the fs? Is there a way to estimate how often we will need to rebuild the fs? Any special tools/packages available to handle this issue? Regards, Pradeep.

Will it be possible to run RAC 9i on OCFS2 if RAC 9i becomes available on RHEL4? Regards, Jimmy Thomsen University of Tromso e-mail: jimmy.thomsen@cc.uit.no -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20051123/5374b0b3/attachment.html

Hi all, Many thanks for responses. But, I've solved the problem. I added on .bash_profile in oracle home dir, one line like this : LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19; export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL Thank you, On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Hakan Koseoglu <hakan at koseoglu.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Wahyu Darmawan > <wahyu.darmawan at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all,

>and tpmC is read intensive. I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive

>and tpmC is read intensive. I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive

Hi all, I've got problem when run command "gsdctl start", and appeared error like this : /home/oracle/jre/1.1.8/bin/../lib/i686/native_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so) Unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread Could not create Java VM Does anyone can help me? Appreciate with

Wim, Thanks for your prompt response on this. The tpmC figures look very impressive, and tpmC is read intensive. I had already read note 236679.1 "Comparing Performance Between RAW IO vs OCFS vs EXT2/3" which I guess is the article to which you are referring; it made me suspect that the poor performance was due to the lack of an OS IO cache but I wasn't sure. The database is

Wim, Thanks for your prompt response on this. The tpmC figures look very impressive, and tpmC is read intensive. I had already read note 236679.1 "Comparing Performance Between RAW IO vs OCFS vs EXT2/3" which I guess is the article to which you are referring; it made me suspect that the poor performance was due to the lack of an OS IO cache but I wasn't sure. The database is

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Hi all, I'm testing OCFS2 as a cluster filesystem for a mail system based on maildir, so basically the filesystem must be able to deal with lots of directories, and lots of small files. The first "oddity", is that when I mount a newly formated ocfs2 fs, it already contains used space: [root@ocfs1 /]# df /cgp02 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on

Dear Experts, One of our client wants to use OCFS for their 9i RAC(2 node) on RHEL3 and also use GFS on the nodes. Would there be any issues using OCFS for Oracle 9i RAC and using GFS for failing over things like print services on the same node? Has this been tested? I know these are competing products and OCFS 2.0is not an option now for the client. They need GFS for their custom apps. Any ideas

Is the order important when installing ocfs2 and Oracle RAC? If you have an existing RAC installation and you want to use ocfs2 for shared files but not for the OCR or Voting Disks, do you need to reinstall the Oracle Clusterware after installing OCFS2? Regards, Nick Donatone -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have tryied change the disk bus to SCSI, add a SCSI controller whose model is virtio-scsi, still can't setup the RAC instance. I tried to use windows 2008 Failover Cluster feature to setup a a Failover Cluster instead, and I can't find any cluster disk to share between two nodes. So when Failover Cluster is setup, I can't add any Cluster disk to the Failover Cluster. Have I missed

Hello, I've successfully configured RAC on Redhat AS, with external firewire + ocfs. The whole process was done without any errors and have created the database. (Thanks to Wim Coekaerts useful article). But now, how do I actually use it? If I have a client making a connection, to which node do I connect? Are there also any recommended procedures to test RAC's capabilities? Thanks.

I know this isn't entirely OCFS related, but out of curiosity, but what experience have you had running RAC on RedHat or SuSE? I know Oracle supports both, but is one a better choice than the other? Seems to me like Oracle has been working more with RedHat. Does anyone know what Oracle mostly uses internally? What distro do you guys develop on? Would there be any drawbacks for choosing to

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:14:39AM +0800, Timon Wang wrote: > I have tryied change the disk bus to SCSI, add a SCSI controller whose > model is virtio-scsi, still can't setup the RAC instance. > > I tried to use windows 2008 Failover Cluster feature to setup a a > Failover Cluster instead, and I can't find any cluster disk to share > between two nodes. So when Failover

Hi, I am currently involved in a project with E-Business 11i.9. For the production enviroment, ct. wants to implement Load Balance and Fail Over - both middle tier and database tier, the last with RAC. As E11i creates lots of tablespaces, the best way seems to be OCFS. We installed & configured OCFS partitions. The next step was to install E11i multi tier, single instance - already