similar to: systems hang when accessing parts of the OCFS2 file system

Does anybody knows if is there a certified procedure in to backup a RAC DB 10.2.0.3 based on OCFS2 , via split mirror or snaphots technology ? Using Linux LVM and OCFS2, does anybody knows if is possible to dinamically extend an OCFS filesystem, once the underlying LVM Volume has been extended ? Thanks in advance Riccardo Paganini

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, simple question: how can I execute a "fsck.ocfs2 /dev/sdf"? All I get is - ---snip--- myhost:~ # fsck.ocfs2 /dev/sdf fsck.ocfs2 1.4.3 Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/sdf: Label: SAP01 UUID: 5969C8CABB854F8EA9C17B5B8DE48EC6 Number of blocks: 183500800 Block size: 4096 Number of

Hello Hendrik Can you help input 2 commands 'mount' and 'df -TPh' on OMV, and post the output to us, thank you. -- Regards, Jones Syue | ??? QNAP Systems, Inc.

Hi all-- I stumbled on this problem online. I did not like the solution given there which was a long UDF. I thought why cannot split and l/s apply work here. My aim is to split the data frame, use l/sapply, make changes on the split lists and combine the split lists to new data frame with the desired changes/output. The data frame shown below has a column named ID which has 2 variables a and b;

Hi, I have two dataframes one with 144 rows and 160 columns (SDF1) and one with 12 rows and 160 columns (SDF2). Now I'm trying to divide rows 1:12 with SDF2, rows 13:24 with SDF2, rows 25:36 with SDF 2, . In S-Plus the following code works fine: DFS = SDF1[1:144,1:60] / as.vector(SDF2[1:12,1:160]) but in R when I try to implement the formula I get the following error: "/

Hi, I have a dataframe SDF1 that looks like this: Char1 Char2 Char 3 W.2007.02 W.2007.09 W.2007.16 W.2008.13 A C1 F1 F2 F3 A C2 F4 B C3 F5 F6 I have another dataframe SDF2 with 163 cols that has the following column names Char1 Char2 Char 3 W.2007.02 W.2007.03 W.2007.04

I just came up with a solution right after i posted the question, but i figured there must be a better and shorter one.than my solution sdf1[[1]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[1]] sdf1[[2]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[2]] EK On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all-- > > I stumbled on this problem online. I did not like the solution given > there

Hi, When I upgraded my cluster, df started returning some odd numbers for my legacy volumes. Newly created volumes after the upgrade, df works just fine. I have been researching since Monday and have not found any reference to this symptom. "vm-images" is the old legacy volume, "test" is the new one. [root at st-srv-03 ~]# (df -h|grep bricks;ssh st-srv-02 'df -h|grep

Why do you want to modify df1? Why not just reassemble the parts as a new data frame and use that going forward in your calculations? That is generally the preferred approach in R so you can re-do your calculations easily if you find a mistake later. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 7, 2018 7:35:59 PM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >I just came

I got the email that a drive in my 4-drive RAID10 setup failed. What are my options? Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). mdadm.conf: # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda MAILADDR root AUTO +imsm +1.x -all ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 /proc/mdstat: Personalities : [raid10] md127 : active raid10 sdf1[2](F)

Thank you Jeff. Your code works, as usual , perfectly. I am just wondering why if i put the whole code in one line, i get an error message. sdf2 <- lapply( sdf, function(z){z$Value <-ifelse(is.na(z$Value),z$Value[!is.na(z$Value)][1],z$Value)z}) error. unexpected symbol in sdf2 Thanks again EK On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: >

Hello list users. I am trying to create an ocfs filesystem but when I execute the command says the following thing to me: rac01:~ # mkfs.ocfs -b 128 -g oinstall -u oracle -L ocfs_pruebas -m /opt/oracle/oradata/OCFS -p 755 /dev/sdf1 Error opening device /dev/raw/raw41. Not a directory But it isn't a raw device. Any one know why it search for a raw device ? Thanks <DIV><FONT

Upon closer examination I see that you are not using the split version of df1 as I usually would, so here is a reproducible example: #---- df1 <- read.table( text= "ID ID_2 Firist Value 1 a aa TRUE 2 2 a ab FALSE NA 3 a ac FALSE NA 4 b aa TRUE 5 5 b ab FALSE NA ", header=TRUE, as.is=TRUE ) sdf <- split( df1, df1$ID ) # note the extra [ 1 ]

Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 29/01/19 15:03, mark ha scritto: > >> I've no idea what happened, but the box I was working on last week has >> a *second* bad drive. Actually, I'm starting to wonder about that >> particulare hot-swap bay. >> >> Anyway, mdadm --detail shows /dev/sdb1 remove. I've added /dev/sdi1... >> but see both /dev/sdh1 and

Rsync version 3.0.5pre1 is now available for release testing. This is a bug-fix release. Please test this new release and send email to the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, or bug reports. To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.4, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src-previews/rsync-3.0.5pre1-NEWS You can download the source tar file and its signature

Rsync version 3.0.5pre1 is now available for release testing. This is a bug-fix release. Please test this new release and send email to the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, or bug reports. To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.4, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src-previews/rsync-3.0.5pre1-NEWS You can download the source tar file and its signature

I don't know. You seem to be posting in HTML so your code is mangled. Can you post plain text and use the reprex package to make sure it produces the errorin a clean R session? -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 8, 2018 8:03:45 AM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >Thank you Jeff. Your code works, as usual , perfectly. I am just >wondering why

Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 29/01/19 18:47, mark ha scritto: >> Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> Il 29/01/19 15:03, mark ha scritto: >>> >>>> I've no idea what happened, but the box I was working on last week >>>> has a *second* bad drive. Actually, I'm starting to wonder about >>>> that particulare hot-swap bay. >>>>

Hello, I have installed ocfs2 without problem and use it for a RAC10gR2. Only Clusterware files are ocfs2 type. multipath is also used. When I issue : mounted.ocfs2 -f I have a strange result: Device FS Nodes /dev/sda ocfs2 Unknown: Bad magic number in inode /dev/sda1 ocfs2 pocrhel2, pocrhel1 /dev/sdb ocfs2 Not mounted /dev/sdf

Should I report this as a bug somewhere? Or is it just a problem with the old fedora box, probably fixed long ago and not relevant to the centos list? On the server side, theme4, a very old fedora box, exports t4d5 via NFS. t4d5 is big, has lots of space, and the user tobiasf has plenty of quota: [root at theme4 ~]# quota -vls tobiasf|grep sdf /dev/sdf1 1312G 4578G 4769G