similar to: Custom Fields

I recently converted a habtm relationship into one using has_many :through. Some of my old logic relied on the ability to use the #<< operator to add items to the relationship and get them auto- saved. I''m curious to know the best way to do the same operation with the has_many :through configuration. I looked through the list archives and didn''t find my answer.

I have an events listing site that includes the models Event and DateAndTime, so an event that happens more than once (like a high school play) can have more than one date_and_time. The Event model has_many date_and_times, and the DateAndTime model belongs_to event. The Event model validates_presence_of two submission form variables, the_date and the_time, and those variable values then get used

(I posted this yesterday but it never showed up on the mailing list... weird.) I recently converted a habtm relationship into one using has_many :through. Some of my old logic relied on the ability to use the #<< operator to add items to the relationship and get them auto- saved. I''m curious to know the best way to do the same operation with the has_many :through

I''m a relative n00b when it comes to Rails. I''ve gone through Michael Hartl''s tutorials (both editions, books and screencasts) and I can build a basic CRUD web app without help. However, for a personal project I''m working on, I''m lost as to how to move forward. Here''s the situation ... I have a model called Project with two fields,

Hi all My site has news entries, it has a party calendar and it has a blog. Now I''d like to create a commenting system that in fact is quite simple, but I wanna use it for all these 3 types of content. My question: how can I do that? I maybe could add an association to all three types in the comment model: class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :news_item belongs_to

Hi, The standard setup: class Task: has_many :studies, :class_name => "Study" has_many :datasets, :through => "studies" class Dataset: has_many :studies has_many :tasks, :through => ''studies'' class Study: belongs_to :task belongs_to :dataset Now, if I have an edit view for my Task, is it possible to set up the form so that in the

For an Xray file system patients have folders and folders have studies. That is: patients folders studies id id id name patient_id folder_id ... label type ... ... The list of studies with their associated folder and patient might look like this: name folder_label study_type

I''ve got a User class and an Employer class set up as follows: User.rb: has_many :employers Employer.rb belongs_to :user My tables are as follows: mysql> select id,first_name,last_name from users limit 5; +-----+------------+-----------+ | id | first_name | last_name | +-----+------------+-----------+ | 711 | Patrick | Stewart | | 714 | Larry | Davis | mysql>

Hi, I''ve been breaking my head over this thing with no success. Here is my table layout - class User < AR has_many :memberships has_many :groups, :through => :memberships ... class Group < AR has_many :memberships has_many :users, :through => :memberships ... class Membership < AR belongs_to :user, :class_name => "User", :foreign_key =>

Hi, I have a problem with configuring dovecot passdb for Oauth2 with keyclock. A user can access more mailbox, mailboxes are associated with the user. When a user login with this method: OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE LITERAL+ AUTH=PLAIN] Dovecot ready. a login mailbox*user password Dovecot when requiring the grant_url send to Keyclock, for example, this post

Say I want to gather info from various Models... Files, Folders, and put them into a ''display'' Object DisplayFilesystem that will standarize the info from both tables (for display only)... Class DisplayFilesystem attr_accessor :item_id, :name, :type, :description, :date def initialize @item_id = @name = @type = @description = @date = nil end end So in the code side

Hello, I was just reading the following bug ticket: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=3149&aid=10744&group_id=797 I notice that you devs have to repeat yourselves quite a bit about requiring the different types of data that are required to diagnose bugs. Could you modify the RubyForge tracker to accommodate this information? You could even make them all required

I''ve seen http://railscasts.com/episodes/73-complex-forms-part-1, part2 and part3. It seems to be my case. I have: Company has_many :documents has_many :tenders, :through.......... and Document belongs_to :company Tender has_many :companies, :through.......... I want to insert documents and tenerds on company creation. If documents are more than one the user can click "add

Greetings all, I am looking for some insight from some of the more experienced with has_many :through relationships as I am having a hard time reconciling the performance I am seeing. I have 2 tables that are linked together via has_many :through Table 1: urls ( there are about 7,000 records ) 2 fields, id and url Table 2: phrases ( there are about 87,000 records ) 2 fields, id and phrase (w/

I''m looking for a good way to search a few fields accross multiple asociated tables (i.e. find ''friends and family'' accross Photo.name, Photo.description, and Tags.name where Photo has_many tags). And, ideally there''s a competent query analyzer/parser. I''ve expirimented with constructing my own SQL using ... LIKE %term1% ... etc, but the

Hi, I have here a problem I''ve been working at for a little while but I can''t seem to get the error messages to appear correctly. My form looks something like this for "ModelA": [errors_for "modelA"] [form for "modelA"] [text "modelA" "fieldname1"] [text "modelB" "fieldname2"] [submit] [/form] The reason

I am trying to use acts_as_ferret''s multi_search to search across multiple models, but i only want it to return one type of model. for example i have a page that lists out people. on this page it shows email addresses and phone numbers. I want to be able to search by any fields directly from the person model and search the fields from the email_address and phone_number models, but I only

Hi folks, I was recently made aware that the only way to currently set custom fields in a relational database for CDR is via the experimental cdr_adaptive_odbc drivers found here: http://svncommunity.digium.com/view/tilghman/branches/1.4/cdr_adaptive_odbc.c?view=log I had no problem compiling the driver, and copied the module to /usr/lib/asterisk/modules on my box and setup

Hello RSpec users, Have been using RSpec since 0.8.2 (not too long ago, I must say). and been creating my custom matchers since was defined as "good practice". Also, auto-generated names for the examples is very helpful, I''m trying to take advantage of it. Since I often prior code/define all the "examples", I have created a few matchers to fulfill associations and

LDAP Account Manager (LAM) 6.1.RC1 - September 5th, 2017 ======================================================== LAM is a web frontend for managing accounts stored in an LDAP directory. Announcement: ------------- Input fields are now trimmed before sending to avoid leading/trailing spaces. LAM Pro custom fields support minimum/maximum entries for multi-value fields. There is also a new field