similar to: Calculating volume size from superblock

I have a setup with lot's of small files (Maildir), in 4 different volumes and for some reason the volumes are full when they reach 60% usage (as reported by df ). This was ofcourse a bit of a supprise for me .. lots of failed writes, bounced messages and very angry customers. Has anybody on this list seen this before (not the angry customers ;-) ? Regards, =paulv # echo "ls

Hello, We have a 3-node cluster setup with ocfs2. Since friday one of the nodes went down and would not become clustermember after a reboot because it was unable to write to the ocfs2 filesystem. Message: no space left on device. There is plenty of diskspace though. No problem whatsoever to create a file / directory on the filesystem using one of the other nodes. Today one of the remaining

Hi all. I have a 50 GB OCFS2 file system. I'm currently using ~26GB of space but df is reporting 43 GB used. Any ideas how to find out where the missing 17GB is at? The file system was formatted with a 16K cluster & 4K block size. Thanks, Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Just a quick question. What is the maximum and minimum volume sizes that OCFS2 supports? I'm working on doing a plugin for EVMS to support OCFS2. One of the functions needs that info. Thanks, John

Recently I ran into a situation where an ocfs2 (1.4) volume was reporting it was out of space when it was not. Deleting some files helped short term but the problem quickly comes back. I believe this is due to the fragmentation bug that I have seen references to in the mailing list archive. I am trying to reproduce the problem on a test system so that I can validate that upgrading to 1.6

Hi, I'm sending a series of patches implementing quota support into ocfs2-tools. It's the same as the original huge patch I've sent but now it's split as Joel asked. I've also realized that when disabling SPARSE feature, we should update quota information. That piece of code is missing, I'll implement it soon. Comments welcome. Honza

Now it's a good time to introduce the new tool 'o2info' since kernel part of OCFS2_IOC_INFO ioctl has been pulld upstream by linus. The following 6 patches have already got sunil's SOBs, and now they're trying to attract more reviewers before it goes to central repo with a modification of getting manual pages being introduced.

Hello. I'm having issues using ocfs2 and drbd in dual primary mode. After running some filesystem test's that create a lot of small files I run really fast into "No space left on device" The non failing node is able to write/read from the filesystem. And the failing node is also able to delete/read from the filesystem Ubuntu custom kernel 2.6.27.2 o2cb_ctl version 1.3.9 drbd

Hi, this is the next version of quota support for quota tools. I've addressed all the comments of Tao, Joel and others. Sparse feature disabling also correctly updates quota information now and the patch is merged into the tunefs support patch. Honza

Hi ALL I have a question about DISK space of OCFS2. I copy a file by a "cp" command after check the DISK space by "df -k" command. There is no change when I cheked the DISK space by "df -k"command again. I show below an procedure. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- root at CPU_N:/fm/bbb> ls -l total 3 -rwxr-xr-x 1

Hi, below comes a new version of the series of patches implementing quota support for ocfs2-tools. I've fixed the calls of ocfs2_malloc_blocks() which were given number of bytes instead of number of blocks. Besides that the series should be the same. Honza

Add online resize in tunefs.ocfs2 so that user can increase the volume when it is mounted.

Hi all, I stumbled over a curious thing. The Linux tools "df" and "du" aren't working correctly on an OCFS2 filesystem. "df" shows approx. twice the size as there is on the volume. Here how I found out about this issue: - same dir(a few files more in OCFS but the files are ca. 12 kB in size), first on XFS second on the OCFS volume # du -ms

Hi, The ocfs2 package compiled perfectly, but tools did not. The test setup is using opensuse10.1 - updates applied For "ocfs2-tools-1.2.2": In file included from include/ocfs2.h:60, from alloc.c:32: include/ocfs2_fs.h: In function ?ocfs2_fast_symlink_chars?: include/ocfs2_fs.h:566: warning: implicit declaration of function ?offsetof? include/ocfs2_fs.h:566: error: expected

Hello all, I'm having trouble compiling ocfs2-tools-1.6.3 on slackware64-13.1 These are my configure flags (the last 2 I added after googling this problem, but didn't help): ./configure \ --sbindir=/sbin \ --bin=/bin \ --libdir=/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX} \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --datadir=/etc/ocfs2 \ --sharedstatedir=/var/ocfs2 \ --libexecdir=/usr/libexec \

Hello, attached is a patch which implements necessary support for mkfs so that quota files can be created. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz> SUSE Labs, CR -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Implement-quota-support-to-mkfs-and-add-a-few-auxili.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 16966 bytes Desc: not available Url :

I just upgraded to Fedora Core 2 from Fedora Core 1. Discovered that UW-IMAP was replaced with Cyrus. Not quite ready to switch to that mail box format so I instead installed dovecot which comes with Fedora Core 2. The RPM version is: dovecot-0.99.10.4-4 The problem I am having is that it seems to want to put folders in: ~/mail/mail/ I would like the folders to be in: ~/mail/ Currently in

Hi, we have recently started to use ocfs2 on some RHEL 5.5 servers (ocfs2-1.4.7) Some days ago, two servers sharing an ocfs2 filesystem, and with quite virtual services, stalled, in what it seems on ocfs2 issue. This are the lines in their messages files: =====node heraclito (0)======================================== /Dec 4 09:15:06 heraclito kernel: o2net: connection to node parmenides

So is there any possibility of getting it so that the Subversion repository can get the check-in comments from the internal CVS repository? At the moment every log file comment I see in SVN is "Sync". Which doesn't really let me know what has happenned without having to go lock at the actual diff between the two versions. And even then I may not have any idea why the change was

So is there any possibility of getting it so that the Subversion repository can get the check-in comments from the internal CVS repository? At the moment every log file comment I see in SVN is "Sync". Which doesn't really let me know what has happenned without having to go lock at the actual diff between the two versions. And even then I may not have any idea why the change was