similar to: OCFS with BCV

Hi All Does anyone have information on OCFS compatibility with Legato. i.e Can we use Letato to backup directly from OCFS Volumes. Also does OCFS work with BCV. R'gds Varghese Abraham. -----Original Message----- From: ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com]On Behalf Of Wim Coekaerts Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 9:33 AM To: Andreas Piesk Cc:

Hi Sunil, I had filed a bug and saw your response stating that it would be fixed in version 14. In the meanwhile , what we want to know is whether this bug is a minor bug and can be ignored for now. Does reporting 100% inodes cause any problem for the OCFS file system or can we ignore this bug and go into production. Also can you tell us by when version 14 would be released. R'gds

Hi Sunil, I'm looking into this thread now. Does this mean we cannot use FTP option to copy OCFS files to ext3? If so, is there any ftp version available for OCFS, similar to cp --o_direct? Also, is there any version of sync available for OCFS (in normal FS, sync does a refresh of FS from kernel cache so that the FS is consistent). By this can we say that the FS shard by both nodes is

Output df -i ------------------ Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on / /dev/sde 348548 348195 353 100% /ocfsa01 /dev/sdf 348548 348195 353 100% /ocfsa02 /dev/sdg 348548 348195 353 100% /ocfsa03 /dev/sdk 139410 138073 1337 100% /ocfsq01 Output df -kP ----------------------- Filesystem

Hi, we have a 2 node / 3 node RAC installation with OCFS. We have the following observations. 1. TIME STAMP Issue We have noticed that the time stamp which is shown on the datafiles doesnt remain the same even after a shutdown normal /shutdown immediate i.e If I shutdown all RAC instances ( A , B , C) using shutdown normal / immediate, the timestamp on the datafiles are not the same. Even

Hi All, we are using Red Hat 2.1 Kernel e38 along with MSA 1000. ocfs version being used is $ rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 Database Version is 9.2.0.5 However we find that the performance of the database on OCFS is too slow. even a select count(1) from all_tables takes like a while to complete. We initially assumed RAC is

Hi , has anyone noticed performance problems while using 4 GB file sizes with OCFS on linux. We somehow find out RAC system very slower than it should be. We are using 1.0.11-1 version of OCFS. R'gds Abraham.

Hi, is it possible and safe to use more than one RAC-Cluster using OCFS in the same LAN? I'm considering to following setup: a 2-node production and a 2-node test system, the production data is stored in an EMC Symmetrix and for the test-system the production data is copied once to a BCV disk internally. This will give me an new independant copy of the production disk with the same contents,

That should say below, we are using Powerpath on the CX300's AND the CX600's... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- We are using Powerpath with CX300's and Emulex HBA's, also with OCFS on Red Hat 2.1 AS. Kernel upgrades are the biggest issue that we have, as some of the drivers are dependent on modules built for specific kernels, and if your

I've created a few OCFS filesystems (RHEL 3, OCFS 1.0.9-12) while attempting to assign ownership by oracle:dba. I've done this both with ocfstool and mkfs.ocfs. They both seem to accept the parameters, but the resulting filesystem is always owned by root:root. This is not a fatal problem, since we can just throw all of our Oracle files into a properly-owned subdirectory in each

Hi, Before I describe the problem, I'll describe my environment. This is a development environment built over 1.5 yrs ago: * We have a 2 node Oracle RAC Cluster. * built on two Dell PowerEdge 1850 Servers (Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz) * OS is RHEL3 U3 * Kernel 2.4.21-20.ELsmp * these 2 servers are attached to an EMC AX100 SAN via fibre channel * HBA (QLogic QLA6312 PCI to Fibre

A couple years ago, we moved to Oracle RAC on Linux using ocfs that is SAN attached to an EMC CLARiiON. At the time, there was a reason that we did NOT use EMC's Powerpath (I just can't recall what that reason was). What I'd like to know is if there are any issues with introducing Powerpath now. * RHEL 2.1 AS * 2.4.9-e.38enterprise * ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.13-1 * EMC

Just wanted to see if anyone has had the opportunity to expand a MetaLUN on an EMC CLARiiON. The O/S is Red Hat AS 2.1 running Oracle 9i RAC (4 node). The filesystems are a series of LUNs combined into a MetaLUN that is formatted and mounted as OCFS. We are ready to expand a MetaLUN, but wanted to see if anyone has done this "on the fly", ie: Expand the MetaLUNs while the systems are

Hi, folks. <shameless plug for rsync> rsync has changed the way I handle mirroring tasks, and is a wonderful compliment to EMC's timefinder product. EMC handles their BCV mirror splits, and rsync handles files and hierarchies on non-EMC disk. I am quite happy with this arrangement. For small numbers of systems, rsync is far simpler than NIS+/LDAP for replicating certain types of

Anexed is my function for reading codebooks and the Vq Table. My problem is: I read a codeBook number of 41, so i called this function above 41 times. The firtst time, the sync patterns (BCV) is alligned correctly, so it reads correctly. the sencond time it is executed, the patter is not there anymore and there are only 8 BCV in my file. function fReadBits1 is the same as the ogg's read bit

Hello, I'm trying to write a Vorbis decoder (just as a hobby) but I've got a problem with reading the setup header. According to the Vorbis documentation the first data that should be read after the initial 'vorbis' string is an eight bit integer which when incremented by one, contains the number of codebooks in the header. My problem is that whenever I read this number it seems

I've been reading this group for a while and I've noticed a variety of comments regarding running OCFS on top of path-management packages such as EMC's Powerpath, and it brought to mind a problem I've been having. I'm currently testing a six-node cluster connected to a Hitachi 9570V SAN storage array, using OCFS 1.0.12. I have six LUNs presented to the hosts using HDLM,

We are running Linux AS 2.1 .27 enterprise on an EMC CX400 SAN with ocfs version enterprise 1.0.9-12. After formatting the partitions the response from the filesystem is very slow during either read or writes. Even worse, while we can create a directory, we are unable to delete the directory after it has been created. Every time any directory is attempted to be removed with rmdir we get a

Hi all, I have a question regarding the density function which gives the kernel density estimator. I want to decide the bandwidth when using gaussian kernel, given a set of observations. I am not familiar with different methods for bandwidth determination. Below are the different ways in R on deciding the bandwidth. Can anyone give an idea on which ones are preferred. Also, how can I take

Sorry for cross posting, but I somehow came to think that this question might possibly be more suitable in this mailinglist. I am currently fiddeling around with Fedora Core 2. Does anyone of you have any pointers on where to start reading to compile OCFS 1.0.13 on a 2.6.8 kernel? Is it at all possible? Best, //magnus -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Magnus Lubeck [mailto:ml@inwork.ch]