similar to: OCFS and hard links

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "OCFS and hard links"

2003 Nov 24
2
ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not work with RHEL 3errata kernel
From: John Smiley [mailto:pro_oracle@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:07 PM To: Wim Coekaerts Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: [Ocfs-users] ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not work with RHEL 3errata kernel Wim, ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not install when the errata kernel (2.4.21-4.0.1) is installed in RHEL 3. It complains
2003 Nov 26
1
ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not workwith RHEL 3errata kernel
>also - for async io ; >p2448994_9204_LINUX.zip is the patch to apply for oracle >(this is metalink ARU patch number). Wim, The patch description on Metalink says: DIRECT IO SUPPORT ON EXT2 FILESYSTEM Which wasn't quite what I was expecting. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: 25 November 2003 03:23 To: Brian M. Diehl
2003 Dec 29
1
2.4.21-4.0.1 & OCFS 1.0.9-9
Does anyone know if the issues with 4.0.1 have been resolved? (insmod requiring the -f option) I have not been able to get this to work (even with the -f), hence I'm still running 2.4.21-4. TIA! -- Brian M. Diehl Network Admin A-1 Limousine Inc. 609-919-2019
2004 Aug 31
2
Upgrading from 1.0.9-9 to 1.0.13-1
Hello All, I am currently running ocfs 1.0.9-9 with kernel 2.4.21-4.Elhugemem (RHEL3) and 9i RAC (9.2.0.4). Is there any big concerns I need to be aware of before upgrading to ocfs-1.0.13-1 and kernel 2.4.20-31.9? TIA, +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ | Brian M. Diehl, RHCE A-1 Limousine | | Sr. Network Admin 609-919-2019 | | "In the end, things
2004 Jun 08
3
Major RAC slowdown
Hello again. Our production cluster has begun experiencing some vicious slowdowns that may (or may not) be related to the filesystems. When the problem occurs, the load average on the servers jumps up to 30 or higher. Usually one node will climb while the other drops, then they will switch places a few minutes later. At one point, we had one node's load average up over 300. Our site
2010 Nov 09
1
btrfs: unlinked 34 orphans
Hi, I received the message: btrfs: unlinked 34 orphans Just out of couriosity: what does it mean ? Thanks in advance Bye, David Arendt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2005 Aug 04
2
Can't load ocfs on ia64 EL3u3
# uname -r 2.4.21-20.ELsmp [root@hp2620-2 root]# rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.13-1 [root@hp2620-2 root]# /sbin/load_ocfs /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=hp2620-2-eth1 ip_address=10.1.2.101 cs=1913 guid=8D65C7CEECF9EBE638BD0013215BD6E9 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000 insmod: ocfs: no module by that name found load_ocfs: insmod failed [root@hp2620-2 root]#
2005 Aug 02
3
OCFS and ASM
Can I create an OCFS 2 filesystem over a ASM volume to store datafiles? Thanks! Roger---
2005 Jun 26
1
OCFS for SMP kernel (EM64T)
Hi all, My Ct's box is RH 3.0 SMP kernel EM64T. They are asking if OCFS for SMP (EM64T) is available or not. In following site, we can not see OCFS for SMP (EM64T). http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/files/RedHat/RHEL3/x86_64/1.0.14-1/ ---------- ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.ia32e.rpm OCFS driver for kernel version 2.4.21-27.EL and higher (EM64T) ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.src.rpm OCFS driver
2004 Mar 30
1
OCFS install trouble w/ new kernel - unresolved symbols
I successfully have OCFS running in a two-node RAC environment using RHAS 3 (2.4.21-4.EL) using Qlogic 2310 cards. IO performance, however, was terrible with the combination of OCFS and the Qlogic cards. After extensive testing, OCFS did fine on its own, as did the fibre cards. Put the two together, and everything literally ran twice as slow. Support at Qlogic pointed me to
2005 May 23
3
OCFS - Automounts
Greetings, I installed RedHat Linux AS version 3/Update 3 over the weekend, along with ocfs RPMs that are listed below: ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.13-1.i686.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm Oracle 10g was then installed on the systems. On both the test cluster that I used and the production cluster that I installed over the weekend are some pretty strange lines
2004 Feb 12
3
Ocfs mount issues
I am trying to mount the ocfs partitions using the following command Mount -t ocfs -o uid=oracle,gid=dba /dev/sda /ocfs01 as user oracle and group dba. However it mounts the volume as root. But if I use the ocfstool for the first and mount it as oracle:dba, the subsequent mounts using the above command line mounts the volume as oracle:dba. Is there something that I am missing or I will have
2004 Jul 20
1
ocfs support rpm?
I am doing an install of ocfs 1.0.12 on rh 3.0 and rpm install complains [root@xxx ocfs-1.0.12]# rpm -Uvh * error: Failed dependencies: ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-hugemem-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.12-1 where can i find ocfs-support rpm?
2005 May 23
1
RE: Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 25, Issue 6
When OCFS2 is available as Production? == Nguyen Quang Huy Sr. Technical Sales Consultant Oracle Vietnam 53 Quang Trung St, Hanoi Email: quang.huy.nguyen@oracle.com Phone: +84 4 943 2595 Fax: +84 4 943 2592 == -----Original Message----- From: ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com]On Behalf Of ocfs-users-request@oss.oracle.com Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005
2005 Oct 17
2
OCFS for RHAS4 download
Greetings, I read from archive that OCFS is for kernel 2.6. which means RHAS4.0 is supported. However, I can't find the download for this version. Is the support official and where can I download it. Thanks / regards, Ivan Wong Database Administrator e2Open Inc. (www.e2open.com) Suite 34.03, Level 34, Menara Citibank, 156, Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia DID: +603 2776 6397
2006 Nov 16
1
OCFS Error on RHEL -3 Update 8
Hi All, I am getting this error after updating RHEL 3 Update 5 to update 8.. After upgrading OCFS loading get failed boot.log entries Nov 10 06:00:00 HHMEA load_ocfs: modprobe: Can't locate module ocfs Nov 10 06:00:00 HHMEA load_ocfs: load_ocfs: insmod failed Nov 10 06:00:01 HHMEA ocfs:  failed Nov 10 06:00:01 HHMEA mount: mount: fs type ocfs not supported by kernel I had given depmod
2004 Aug 07
1
Source for OCFS Support Package
Hello, I want to use ocfs for a 10g RAC installation on a 2 node cluster, consisting of 1 Athlon and 1 Pentium machine with Firewire storage. OS is RHAS 3. Since I need to build my own binary Athlon rpm's, I downloaded ocfs-1.0.12.tar.gz ocfs-tools-1.0.10.tar.gz I was able to install both (./configure ; make - make install). When I try to load_ocfs I get lots of errors
2004 Dec 06
2
Problem with OCFS and EMC Snapshots
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20041206/e14c6071/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Andrew.McCurdy.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 359 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20041206/e14c6071/Andrew.McCurdy.vcf
2003 Oct 22
1
OCFS problem with 2.4.9-e.27
Hi all, I trying install OCFS in Red Hat AS 2.1, with Kernel 2.4.9-e.27, updated by RedHat-Network Service. When i compile the source code for version ocfs-1.0.9 , ( configure, make and make install) , and then i execute "depmod -a", i have the next output: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-e.27/kernel/drivers/addon/ocfs/ocfs.o If i try insert module with
2003 Jun 27
2
OCFS - NFS
Hi, well i mounted the OCFS drive over nfs, but it seems to have problems with it, because the NFS does not detect changes (if I add or delete files) the nfs shares still shows the old status. If i delete a file on the OCFS volume, and i am doing a "ls" on one of the nfs clients, it says for every file which was on the ocfs, "no such file or directory". Did I miss