similar to: Gluster 2 with stable AFR

HI: Was there a limit of servers which was used as storage in Gluster ? 2009-06-24 eagleeyes ???? gluster-users-request ????? 2009-06-24 03:00:42 ???? gluster-users ??? ??? Gluster-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 34 Send Gluster-users mailing list submissions to gluster-users at gluster.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Hai, Good morning. I am having some trouble while using AFR. In the client side afr volume. volume afr type cluster/afr subvolumes client option replicate *:1 option self-heal on end-volume While i am using the command sudo -u apache cp -p zip/* test_folder/ It shows the message cp: getting attribute `trusted.afr.version' of `zip/ACS1238660426.zip': Operation not permitted

HI: Was there a limit of servers which was used as storage in Gluster ? 2009-06-24 eagleeyes ???? gluster-users-request ????? 2009-06-24 03:00:42 ???? gluster-users ??? ??? Gluster-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 34 Send Gluster-users mailing list submissions to gluster-users at gluster.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Hello: i had met the problem twice when i copy some files into the GFS space . i have five clients and two servers , when i copy files into /data which was GFS space on client A , the problem was appear. in the same path , A server can see the all files ,but B and C or D couldin't see the all files ,liks some files was missing ,but when i mount again ,the files was appear

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Pranith, > > > >> We found that compound fops is not giving better performance in >> replicate and I am thinking of removing that code. Sent the patch at >> https://review.gluster.org/19655 >> >> > If I understand it right, as of now AFR is the only component

On 09/22/2017 07:27 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:27:46PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: >> Hello, >> >> In AFR we currently allow look-ups to pass through without taking into >> account whether the lookup is served from the good or bad brick. We always >> serve from the good brick whenever possible, but if there is none, we just >> serve

Hi. I'm evaluating GlusterFS for our DFS implementation, and wondered how it compares to KFS/CloudStore? These features here look especially nice ( http://kosmosfs.sourceforge.net/features.html). Any idea what of them exist in GlusterFS as well? Regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All I've been looking for something like Gluster for a while and stumbled on it today via the wikipedia pages on Filesystems etc. I have a few very very simple questions that might even be too simple to be on the FAQ, but if you think any of them are decent please add them there. I think it might help if I start with what I want to achieve, then ask the questions. We want to build a high

Fwd'ing this since it seems my reply and your response didn't actually go to the mailing list. -----Original Message----- From: Keith Freedman [mailto:freedman at FreeFormIT.com] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:02 PM To: Will Rouesnel Subject: RE: [Gluster-users] Why does glusterfs not automatically fix these kinds of problems? At 08:47 PM 10/1/2008, you wrote: >Unison operates on

Hi, I'm starting to play with glusterfs, and I'm having a problem with the df output. The value seems to be wrong. (on the client) /var/mule-client$ du -sh 584K . /var/mule-client$ df -h /var/mule-client/ Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on glusterfs 254G 209G 32G 88% /var/mule-client (on the server) /var/mule$ du -sh 584K . Is it a known

Hi. Any idea what speed benefits the BDB translator provides over standard file storage? Also, how it's reliable, and what's the maximum file size it stores in the DB? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20090305/2b391a92/attachment.html>

On 06/28/2017 06:52 PM, Paolo Margara wrote: > Hi list, > > yesterday I noted the following lines into the glustershd.log log file: > > [2017-06-28 11:53:05.000890] W [MSGID: 108034] > [afr-self-heald.c:479:afr_shd_index_sweep] > 0-iso-images-repo-replicate-0: unable to get index-dir on > iso-images-repo-client-0 > [2017-06-28 11:53:05.001146] W [MSGID: 108034] >

Dear Members, Even though Gluster team is growing at a steady phase, our aggressive development schedule out phases our resources. We need to expand and also maintain a 1:1 developer / QA engineer ratio. Our major development focus in the next 8 months will be towards: * Large scale regression tests (24/7/365) * Web based monitoring and management * Hot upgrade/add/remove of storage nodes

I am trying to build the latest release candidate and have run into a bit of a problem. When I run ./configure, I get: GlusterFS configure summary =========================== FUSE client : no Infiniband verbs : no epoll IO multiplex : yes Berkeley-DB : no libglusterfsclient : yes mod_glusterfs : no () argp-standalone : no I am going to need the gluster FUSE client now

Hi all, I upgraded from 1.4.0rc3 to 2.0.0rc1 in my test environment, and while the upgrade itself went smoothly, i appear to be having problems with the (posix-)locks feature. :( The feature is clearly declared in the server config file, and according to the DEBUG-level logs, it is loaded successfully at runtime ; however, when Gluster attempts to lock an object (for the purposes of AFR

Hi all, for the upgrade I followed this procedure: * put node in maintenance mode (ensure no client are active) * yum versionlock delete glusterfs* * service glusterd stop * yum update * systemctl daemon-reload * service glusterd start * yum versionlock add glusterfs* * gluster volume heal vm-images-repo full * gluster volume heal vm-images-repo info on each server every time

Replying and adding gluster-users. That seems more appropriate? ________________________________________ From: gluster-devel-bounces+jwalker=gluster.com at nongnu.org [gluster-devel-bounces+jwalker=gluster.com at nongnu.org] on behalf of Emmanuel Dreyfus [manu at netbsd.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 6:51 AM To: gluster-devel at nongnu.org Subject: [Gluster-devel] volume rebalance still broken

Hi, I'm running the latest qa build of 3.3 and having a bit of trouble with extended attrs. [root at compute-0-0 ~]# rpm -qa | grep gluster glusterfs-geo-replication-3.3.0qa20-1 glusterfs-core-3.3.0qa20-1 glusterfs-rdma-3.3.0qa20-1 glusterfs-fuse-3.3.0qa20-1 Firstly, is it mandatory to mount ext3 file systems with 'user_xattr'? The issue I'm having is that I would like to delete

Paolo, Which document did you follow for the upgrade? We can fix the documentation if there are any issues. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/29/2017 01:08 PM, Paolo Margara wrote: > > Hi all, > > for the upgrade I followed this procedure: > > - put node in maintenance mode (ensure no client are active)

Hello, In AFR we currently allow look-ups to pass through without taking into account whether the lookup is served from the good or bad brick. We always serve from the good brick whenever possible, but if there is none, we just serve the lookup from one of the bricks that we got a positive reply from. We found a bug? [1] due to this behavior were the iatt values returned in the lookup call