similar to: Polymorphic Association with Single Table Inheritance?

Hi all, I am using samba 4.10.7 and it seems to have bug for using @group in valid or invalid conf (?). And i can't find fixed patch in later release. I describe this issue detail below: 1. Firstly, there is my samba conf below (Add @d_group in "invalid users"): (smb_share.conf) [f1] path = /home/f1 write list = "admin" "@Administrator_Group"

Lets say I have 3 models, user, user_group and user_group_nodes. A normal user has one user_group_id as a foreign key and a special user has multiple user_groups which are defined in the user_group_nodes. The user_group_nodes is a "acts_as_list" for user and contains a list of group_ids. When I build a form to get user input and I want to save it, is there a way to validate the

I''m trying to understand these results in irb, which implies that there''s some kind of proxy at play: >> aaron = User.find_by_login ''aaron'' => #<User:0xb7109cdc @attributes={"salt"=>"7e3041ebc2fc05a40c60028e2c4901a81035d3cd", "updated_at"=>nil, "contact_info_id"=>nil,

I''ve written my app already. It outputs valid xhtml and I need a stylesheet to drop over the top. How hard is it for people to understand that? It''s a small project, they''d have to do the main design/layout, and then a little custom styling for some specific elements which don''t appear on every page. That''s the point of CSS right? write once, use

Hi, I'm unable to write to shares on the RH9 box from win2k clients. Have successfully joined domain with 'net join ads' getent passwd lists local unix users and win2k domain users successfully I've mapped a DOMAIN+user_group to unix user_group, which 'net groupmap list' shows successfully I have tried various ways to give DOMAIN+user.name access to the share, by changing

Hi, seem to keep running into a wall here. I can''t find any resources on site navigation that can deal with any model being in the nav, allow nesting, and can dynamically update. So I thought about it for a while, and decided on a MenuItems class, which contained the position of the child in relation to it''s siblings, where the parent and the child were polymorphic. Then a given

Hey The guys at the searchlogic google groups seem to be asleep -.- They didnt'' grant me permission to post yet. But anyways, right now, I followed the searchlogic tutorial found here -http://www.binarylogic.com/2008/09/07/tutorial-pagination-ordering- and-searching-with-searchlogic/ however, in that tutorial, the results of the find displays all my items, before i even search for

Hi all, In my app I would like to create user groups in my admin. Currently I have the following models and associations that facilitate this. class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :memberships has_many :groups, :through => :memberships end class Membership < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :group belongs_to :user end class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_many

I the following three models which all have has_and_belongs_to_many # User <-> UserGroup <-> Permissions class UserGroup < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :users, :join_table => "user_usergroup_join" has_and_belongs_to_many :permissions, :join_table => "usergroup_permission_join", :uniq => true end I can do this: permissions =

No one care then i closed it. Thanks. On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:18 PM Jeremy <jeremy55662004 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using samba 4.10.7 and it seems to have bug for using @group in valid > or invalid conf (?). And i can't find fixed patch in later release. I > describe this issue detail below: > > 1. Firstly, there is my samba conf below (Add

It is my understanding that originally controller names where singular. In all the examples of RESTful controllers the names have been pluralized. So what is the new convention? Singular or plural controller names? Leevi Graham Front End Developer - User Interface Designer www.leevigraham.com | Skype Me: leevi_graham MSN Messenger: info@leevigraham.com Download My VCard --------------

Hi. I have a couple of best practices questions regarding polymorphic associations, naming join tables and user permissions. Currently I have implemented the user authentication model from the rails recipes book. Basically it goes something like this: MODEL CLASSES: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :roles end class Role < ActiveRecord::Base

Hey all, I have a quick question regarding the @template.content_tag methos when creating a custom form builder. Currently have the following method in my AccessibleBuilder class: def datetime_select(field, options = {}) required = options.delete :required label = options.delete :label @template.content_tag("div", @template.content_tag( "span", Example Label ) +

Hi I have 3 tables as 1) user_groups id | contact_id | group_id | group_user_type_id 2) contact id | name_first | name_last | 3)contact_email_addresses contact_id | contact_email_address_type_id | emailaddress Now I have group_id sa for example 68 What I want is from contact_email_addresses table get all the emailaddress with contact_email_address_type_id=2 for the contacts

Fixes a potential (but probably rather unlikely) use after free bug in function temporarily_use_uid(), file uidswap.c. --- a/uidswap.c +++ b/uidswap.c @@ -113,8 +113,9 @@ temporarily_use_uid(struct passwd *pw) } } /* Set the effective uid to the given (unprivileged) uid. */ - if (setgroups(user_groupslen, user_groups) < 0) -

Currently openssh (3.4p1) relies on the NGROUPS_MAX define. This makes the number of allowed simultaneous (per-user) secondary groups a compile-time decision. $ find . -name \*.c | xargs grep NGROUPS_MAX ./groupaccess.c:static char *groups_byname[NGROUPS_MAX + 1]; /* +1 for base/primary group */ ./groupaccess.c: gid_t groups_bygid[NGROUPS_MAX + 1]; ./uidswap.c:static gid_t

I have done a little polymorphic associations stuff and have refreshed my memory on it again. What it seems like is that if I have a particular record and I want to make it easy for many different parent records to associate with it using has_one or has_many, that is fine. If I want a parent record to have multiple kinds of children through one association, I don''t see how to do that

so i am trying to save to a join table in a habtm relationship, but i am having problems. from my view, i pass in a group id with: = link_to "Create New User", new_user_url(:group => 1) User model (user.rb) class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :user_groups accepts_nested_attributes_for :user_groups end UserGroups model (user_groups.rb) class UserGroup <

I am enclosing a context diff of the changes that I made to get openssh working on UWIN. UWIN is a UNIX operating system layer that runs on Win32 systems. For more information on UWIN go to http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/uwin/. I also ran configure using -with-cppflags=-D_BSDCOMP=2. I don't know where that information would go with the source code. Let me know if you need more

Linux has just raised the NGROUPS_MAX limit from 32 to 64k. In doing an audit of various tools, openssh turned up as having incorrect groups handling. Almost no user-space apps really care about NGROUPS_MAX. A proposed patch (untested, since the CVS build won't compile on my RH box.. :-/) : What think? Index: uidswap.c ===================================================================