similar to: Enterprise Application with O_DIRECT access

Hi all, I'm very happy to see the release of 3.3.0. One of the features I was waiting for are striped replicated volumes. We plan to store KVM images (from a OpenStack installation) on it. I read through the docs and found the following phrase: "In this release, configuration of this volume type is supported only for Map Reduce workloads." What does that mean exactly? Hopefully not,

Hi, ?I am trying to compile de fuse-2.7.3glfs10 and I receive the error bellow when I execute de make command. I haven't any idea how to solve this problem. I need --enable-kernel-module to reexport to NFS. What can I do? # cat /etc/SuSE-release SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64) VERSION = 10 PATCHLEVEL = 1 #HW - Dell PowerEdge 850 8GB RAM ECC Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3360

We at Wiseguys are looking into GlusterFS to run our Internet Archive. The archive stores webpages collected by our spiders. The test setup consists of three data machines, each exporting a volume of about 3.7TB and one nameserver machine. File layout is such that each host has it's own directory, for example the GlusterFS website would be located in:

Raghavendra, Thanks very much for your reply. I fixed our data corruption problem by disabling the volume performance.write-behind flag as you suggested, and simultaneously disabling caching in my client side mount command. In very modest testing, the flock() case appears to me to work well - before it would corrupt the db within a few transactions. Testing using built in sqlite3 locks is

I've just setup a simple gluster storage system on Centos 5.2 x64 w/ gluster 1.3.10 I have three storage bricks and one client Everytime i run iozone across this setup, i seem to get a bad file descriptor around the 4k mark. Any thoughts why? I'm sure more info is wanted, i'm just not sure what else to include at this point. thanks [root at green gluster]# cat

Hi everyone, I am currently converting my AoE/GFS setup over to GlusterFS. So far I have been very impressed with Gluster and am loving it's ease of use. I wrestled with GFS for days, and still do too much IMO. ;) I had a question about TCP/IP settings. I know Infiniband as interconnects would give us the best performance, but we currently do not have the budget to upgrade everything, so I

Hi all, A better documentation about the feature, and also information about how to use the features are one of the major ask of the community when they want to use glusterfs, or want to contribute by helping get the features, bug fixes for features, etc. Finally, we have taken some baby steps to get that ask of having better design and documentation resolved. We had discussed this in our

Hi guys, we have a rebalance running on eight bricks since July and this is what the status looks like right now: ===Tue Oct 18 13:45:01 CST 2011 ==== rebalance step 1: layout fix in progress: fixed layout 223623 There are roughly 8T photos in the storage,so how long should this rebalance take? What does the number (in this case) 22362 represent? Our gluster infomation: Repository

All, Thanks to Nigel, this is now deployed, and any new patches referencing github (ie, new features) need the 'DocApproved' and 'SpecApproved' label. Regards, Amar On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > A better documentation about the feature, and also information about how > to use the features are one

Hi All, First of all, happy new year 2018! Hope all of your wishes come true this year, and hope you will have time for contributing to Gluster Project this year too :-) As a contributor and one of the maintainers of the project I would like to propose below plans for Gluster Project, and please share your feedback, and comments on them. - *Improved Automation to reduce the process burden*

Amar, Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer

Hello I have two peers setup and working with x2 bricks each. They have been working via tcp for the last 4-5 months. I just got two Infiniband cards and put the on the peers. I want to change the transport type to rdma instead of tcp but I don't see an easy way to do this. Can you please help me with proper instructions. Best Regards Ivan Dimitrov

This should be a pretty easy issue to reproduce, at least it seems to happen to me very often. (gluster-3.2.5) After storage backend(s) have been rebooted, the client mounts are often broken until you unmount and remount. Example from this morning: I had rebooted storage servers to upgrade them to ubuntu 12.04. Now at the client side: $ ls /gluster/scratch ls: cannot access /gluster/scratch:

Hi Amar, If can say something about the development of GlusterFS - is that there are 2 missing things: 1. Breakage between releases. I'm "stuck" using GlusterFS 3.8 because someone support to enable NFS-Ganesha. from the gluster command has been vanished without anything mentioned in the error message what other commands replaces it. Judging from other people's answers - the

Hi, I think we have a workaround for until we have a fix in the code. The following worked on my system. Copy the attached file to */usr/lib*/glusterfs/**3.12.4**/filter/*. (You might need to create the *filter* directory in this path.) Make sure the file has execute permissions. On my system: [root at rhgsserver1 fuse2]# cd /usr/lib/glusterfs/3.12.5/ [root at rhgsserver1 3.12.5]# l total 4.0K

Hi Freer, Our analysis is that this issue is caused by https://review.gluster.org/17618. Specifically, in 'gd_set_shared_brick_count()' from https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards,

Hi all, I installed glusterfs (version 3.1.3) with zfs-fuse (0.6.9) as the underlying filesystem. After renaming a file, I found the file duplicated. Following is my test scenario. root at ubuntu:/# zpool create tank /dev/sdb root at ubuntu:/# gluster volume create test-volume ubuntu:/tank/exp1 ubuntu:/exp2 root at ubuntu:/# gluster volume start test-volume root at ubuntu:/# mount -t glusterfs

Gluster devs, I found the message below in the archives. glfs-health.sh is not included in the v3.0.3 sources - is there any plan to add this to the "extras" directory? What's its status? Ian == snip == Raghavendra G Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:20:33 -0800 Hi all, Here is some work related to Health monitoring. glfs-health.sh is a shell script to check the health of glusterfs.

Hi all, Following the lines of Red Hat's announcement for commitment for better open-source model, along with many other companies (lead by Facebook/Google/IBM) [1], Gluster project is also proposing to have the COMMITMENT statement in its project. While we discuss about the same here, a RFC patch is submitted to review. [2] [1] -

> > > If anyone would like our test scripts, I can either tar them up and > email them or put them in github - either is fine with me. (they rely > on current builds of docker and docker-compose) > > Sure, sharing the test cases makes it very easy for us to see what would be the issue. I would recommend a github repo for the script. Regards, Amar -------------- next part