Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Transport endpoint is not connected"
2008 Oct 31
3
Problem with xlator
?Hi,
I have the next scenario:
#############################################################################
SERVER SIDE? (64 bit architecture)
?#############################################################################
Two Storage Machines with:
HARDWARE
DELL PE2900 III Intel Quad Core Xeon E5420 2,5Ghz, 2x6Mb cache,
Bus
1333FSB
RAM 4 GB FB 667Mhz (2x2Gb)
8 HDD 1 TB,
2008 Nov 04
1
Reexporting glusterfs to nfs fail
Hi,
I have a machine that must to reexport glusterfs to nfs.
CONFIGURATION
2 glusterfs servers
|
?|
? |
1 gluterfs client
1 nfs server
?|
?|
?|
1 nfs client
#***********************************************
# GLUSTERFS SERVER
?#***********************************************
# Export with glusterfs
$ glusterfs -f /etc/glusterfs/glusterfs-server.vol
$ cat
2009 Feb 09
1
Compiling fuse-2.7.3glfs10 - Error
Hi,
?I am trying to compile de fuse-2.7.3glfs10 and I receive the error
bellow when I execute de make command. I haven't any idea how to solve
this problem. I need --enable-kernel-module to reexport to NFS.
What can I do?
# cat /etc/SuSE-release
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64)
VERSION = 10
PATCHLEVEL = 1
#HW - Dell PowerEdge 850
8GB RAM ECC
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3360
2008 Dec 30
1
quoting users disk space in glusterfs
Hi,
I need to make a quota mechanism to restrict glusterfs space to users.
How I proceed?
I have an AFR installation with two servers and one NFS reexporter
machine working.
--
Martin Gumbau - mgumbau at iciq.es
Responsable Informatic
dels grups teorics
de Quimica Computacional
del ICIQ
2009 Feb 23
1
Interleave or not
Lets say you had 4 servers and you wanted to setup replicate and
distribute. What methoid would be better:
server sdb1
xen0 brick0
xen1 mirror0
xen2 brick1
xen3 mirror1
replicate block0 - brick0 mirror0
replicate block1 - brick1 mirror1
distribute unify - block0 block1
or
server sdb1 sdb2
xen0 brick0 mirror3
xen1 brick1 mirror0
xen2 brick2 mirror1
xen3 brick3 mirror2
replicate block0 -
2009 Jul 29
2
Xen - Backend or Frontend or Both?
I have 6 boxes with a client config (see below) across 6 boxes. I am using
distribute across 3 replicate pairs. Since I am running xen I need to
disable-direct-io and that slows things down quite a bit. My thought was
to move the replicate / distribute to the backend server config so that
self heal can happen on faster backend rather then frontend client with
disable-direct-io.
Does this
2008 Aug 01
1
file descriptor in bad state
I've just setup a simple gluster storage system on Centos 5.2 x64 w/ gluster
1.3.10
I have three storage bricks and one client
Everytime i run iozone across this setup, i seem to get a bad file
descriptor around the 4k mark.
Any thoughts why? I'm sure more info is wanted, i'm just not sure what else
to include at this point.
thanks
[root at green gluster]# cat
2008 Jul 09
2
disk questions: geom and zfs
hail,
I have a 7-stable:
[matheus@xxx /usr/home/matheus]$ uname -a
FreeBSD xxx 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #2: Sun Jul 6 15:03:26 BRT 2008
root@lamneth:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx_7 i386
and there exists three geom things.
gconcat status
Name Status Components
concat/concat0 UP ad4
ad5
gmirror status
Name Status Components
2008 Aug 24
2
Unusual bug in glusterfsd
Hi,
I'm rather new to this project, having stumbled across it earlier this
afternoon, so forgive me if I'm still trying to find my way around. I
was in the need of an alternative to NFS that would let me spread the
task of sharing my downloaded source code files across a couple of
boxes, and GlusterFS looked like a great candidate, having had no luck
with Coda or OpenAFS.
I also want
2008 Nov 19
2
gmirror and gstripe
hail,
I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE:
FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13 23:54:59
BRT 2008 root@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386
where I have two 750GB Seagate SATA Disks. They are divided as two slices,
around the first 120GB are gathered in gmirror, and what left is in
gstripe. so that's whats going on. if the machine locks, and fsck comes to
2008 Dec 30
0
error gf_block_unserialize_transport server: EOF from peer
Hi,
I'm getting the following error message in my glusterfsd.log file:
2008-12-30 11:51:45 E [protocol.c:271:gf_block_unserialize_transport]
server: EOF from peer (192.168.4.51:1012)
2008-12-30 11:51:46 E [protocol.c:271:gf_block_unserialize_transport]
server: EOF from peer (192.168.2.14:1021)
2008-12-30 11:51:47 E [protocol.c:271:gf_block_unserialize_transport]
server: EOF from peer
2008 Sep 15
1
Errors on mounting (but works)
Hi!
When I'm mounting a client with fstab and a server-supplied client-spec file
I get the following in the server-log:
2008-09-15 15:04:42 D [tcp-server.c:145:tcp_server_notify] server:
Registering socket (63) for new transport object of 192.168.10.12
2008-09-15 15:04:42 E [server-protocol.c:5212:mop_getspec] server: Unable to
open /etc/glusterfs/glusterfs-client.vol.192.168.10.12 (No such
2005 Apr 21
4
PAT problem
Hello everybody,
I want to solve the following problem with Shorewall:
I have a computer with one NIC (eth0) with an internal IP address
(10.1.x.x), which is supposed to accept connections from various
clients (10.2.x.x) and redirect them to another IP address (10.3.x.x)
with a different destination port.
For example:
The software on the client computer is told to connect to the
Shorewall
2008 Dec 20
14
building 1.4.0rc6
I am trying to build the latest release candidate and have run into a
bit of a problem.
When I run ./configure, I get:
GlusterFS configure summary
===========================
FUSE client : no
Infiniband verbs : no
epoll IO multiplex : yes
Berkeley-DB : no
libglusterfsclient : yes
mod_glusterfs : no ()
argp-standalone : no
I am going to need the gluster FUSE client now
2008 Dec 16
4
GlusterFS process take very many memory
Hello!!!
I try use GLusterFS + openvz, but gfs process every 1 minute memory usare increase at ~2MB. How i can fix this?
P.S. sorry about my bad english.
Cluster information:
1) 3 nodes (server-client), conf:
##############
# local data #
##############
volume vz
type storage/posix
option directory /home/local
end-volume
volume vz-locks
type features/posix-locks
subvolumes vz
end-volume
2002 Oct 30
1
Trouble with XP/Pro and Samba PDC
Hi all,
i have some trouble with my Samba PDC and XP. The XP-Box joins the
samba-domain without problems. The machine trust accounts also appear in
passwd-file correctly.
The problem is that i can't log in to the xp-box (domain) after i joined
the domain. The error message tells me that xp can't find the domain
controller or the user account. I am trying to log in with the same
account as
2009 Jun 24
2
Limit of Glusterfs help
HI:
Was there a limit of servers which was used as storage in Gluster ?
2009-06-24
eagleeyes
???? gluster-users-request
????? 2009-06-24 03:00:42
???? gluster-users
???
??? Gluster-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 34
Send Gluster-users mailing list submissions to
gluster-users at gluster.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
2019 Sep 20
2
7.7.1908, interface bonding, and default route
Hi!
I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being
set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the
corresponding configuration for the master is (
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0):
TYPE=Bond
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes
NAME=bond0
DEVICE=bond0
ONBOOT=yes
IPADDR=10.3.20.131
PREFIX=24
2009 Jun 04
2
alfresco with GFS2.0.0
HELLO :
Were there somebody who had used alfresco and GFS work well?
I met some problems when alfresco create it index files in GFS ,alfresco couldn't start up ,but use server's local dir for alfresco ,it start well.
The alfresco log is this :
14:22:43,009 User:System ERROR [lucene.index.IndexInfo] Channel reopen failed on index info files in:
2008 Jun 01
1
TCP/IP Settings
Hi everyone,
I am currently converting my AoE/GFS setup over to GlusterFS. So far I have been very impressed with Gluster and am loving it's ease of use. I wrestled with GFS for days, and still do too much IMO. ;)
I had a question about TCP/IP settings. I know Infiniband as interconnects would give us the best performance, but we currently do not have the budget to upgrade everything, so I