similar to: Samba 3.0.6rc2 Available for Download

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Summary: Potential Buffer Overruns in Samba 3.0 and Samba 2.2 CVE ID: CAN-2004-0600, CAN-2004-0686 ~ (http://cve.mitre.org/) - ------------- CAN-2004-0600 - ------------- Affected Versions: >= v3.0.2 The internal routine used by the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT v3.0.2 and later) to decode the base64 data

Hello, Is there some Rails 3.0.6 ETA? I am asking because there are some security holes in Rails 3.0.3, which are currently available in Fedora 15. So is it right time to update Rails to 3.0.5 or is it worth of waiting for 3.0.6? Vit -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to

Good afternoon. I have installed the 3.0.6rc2 version of samba and have found the users can't change their password. Cheers, Rafael Paris Gerente de Sistemas Casino e-mail: rparis@hotelmaruma.com pagina web/page: www.hotelmaruma.com Telefono/Phone: 0058 261 730 27 70 Fax: 0058 261 730 28 10

Hi all, yesterday i switched from Samba 3.0.5 to 3.0.6 RC2 because we want to upgrade our Windows XP clients to SP2 which seems to cause printing problems with all older versions of Samba. Unfortunately this reintroduced a problem regarding DOS ( please see http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-July/089609.html ) which i already had experienced when i switched from Samba 3.0.4 to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Summary: Potential Buffer Overruns in Samba 3.0 and Samba 2.2 CVE ID: CAN-2004-0600, CAN-2004-0686 ~ (http://cve.mitre.org/) - ------------- CAN-2004-0600 - ------------- Affected Versions: >= v3.0.2 The internal routine used by the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT v3.0.2 and later) to decode the base64 data

Hello! I use Windows XP SP2 on my clients. I use the http://unattended.sf.net to automatically install my WinXP machines from a MS-DOS client. This works fine in samba-3.0.5 but since SP2 causes a problem with printers I upgraded to samba-3.0.6rc2. RC2 in turn doesn't work with MS-DOS clients. The symptom is that I can boot from the fileserver but when I try to invoke a program I get

When upgrading our test system from 3.0.5pre1 to 3.0.5rc1 with identical configurations we found that one share using a group name with an embedded space was no longer accessible after the upgrade. Here's an example of the logged error message: [2004/07/13 10:50:07, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgrnam(298) group 'Domain in domain TESTDOM does not exist That's coming

Hi all, I experienced the same problem with 3.0.4 that Jeremy and Bruno were discussing - NTBackup unable being to connect to shares and erroring out with 'Access Denied'. I have today upgraded to 3.0.5 (using the Debian Woody packages) and that didn't fix the problem. Was the fix in 3.0.5r1 only applicable to 2000/2003 server? I am stuck in the dark ages of NT 4 here, maybe that is a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a release candidate snapshot of the Samba 3.0.5 code base and should be considered for testing only. A release candidate (RC) means that we are close to the final, stable release and in provided for Quality Assurance (QA) purposes. This release is *not* intended for production servers. Use at your own risk. There have been several bug fixes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a release candidate snapshot of the Samba 3.0.5 code base and should be considered for testing only. A release candidate (RC) means that we are close to the final, stable release and in provided for Quality Assurance (QA) purposes. This release is *not* intended for production servers. Use at your own risk. There have been several bug fixes

Versions: OS: Redhat ES Linux 3.0 Windows OS: Windows 2003 & Active Directory Samba: samba-3.0.5rc1-2_rh9.i386.rpm Kerberos: krb5-1.3.4-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar Using Windbind: Yes Objective: Allow Samba/Linux server to authenticate off of active directory to access Samba shares. Problem: I can get to some shares, but not to the user home shares. When trying to access a user home share I

Hi All, I have been having problems with the known issue on 3.0.4 with NTBackup and a DFS related issue. Therefore I decided to give 3.0.5rc1 a go, as SuSE have released the rpms on their website. Once I installed the rpms, I found that all daemons started correctly, but all domain authentication failed (I am running a samba server as a member server against a Windows 2000 mixed mode domain).

Hallo Gurus! Sorry my English. I've got some strange problems with Samba-3.0.4. Wenn I try to copy Files from NT (with Scopy.exe) to one Mointmount on Samba, that provide error "Invalid Destination X:\" I tested with fstype = ntfs or so but no way :( I see with Explorer the Mount Drive. Thanks for one Tip. Greetings Ruben Moretti

Hello, I have to migrate 30GB from a Novell Netware 4.11 to Samba (ReiserFS/ACL). When I used robocopy.exe from the Windows XP Resource-Kit, it will only copy the Timestamp, but not the owner. Is there a way to copy the owner of a file or directory? matze

I have a windows 2003 server and a SAMBA file server. I appear to have joined the ads realm. When I do a klist I have 3 tickets. for krbtgt,kadmin,kdc server from my SAMBA file server I can access all shares on windows 2003 machine. When my 2003 clients try to access the samba file server they get the login box. It doesn't matter what you enter it will not allow access. My windows 2003

I've looked through the archives and the only information I can find regarding Windows XP SP2 is RC2. Has anyone out there had ANY experience with XP SP2 Official and a Samba 3 domain? -- Bert Rapp North Trail RV Center p 239.693.8200 f 239.693.8115

The Samba 3.0.5rc1 server is configured as a PDC. [global] # client code page = 866 # NetBIOS name of that comp netbios name = TOLTEC #Name of Domain workgroup = liin #Comment server string = Samba PDC %v #Interface where samba works interfaces = 10.0.0.4/24 127.0.0.1/24 bind interfaces only = yes hosts allow = 10.0.0. name resolve

Just Installed 3.0.5rc1 and the problem persists unfortunately, heres a sample of my log : wins[15212]: [2004/07/12 12:31:03, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jul 12 12:31:03 mandrake1 nss_wins[15212]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (9 - 8) in safe_strcpy [TAENO~EI.PDF] Jul 12 12:31:03 mandrake1 nss_wins[15212]: [2004/07/12 12:31:03, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jul 12 12:31:03

Hi, I'm having problems creating hard links on a samba share from a samba client. My environment is as follows: - PDC on a Windows NT - samba-3.0.5 client - samba-3.0.5 server (homes) I use winbindd to authenticate and it is working fine, I can create, remove and change files without any problems. The mount command line I'm using is: mount -t smbfs //10.101.0.231/homes /mnt -o

Hi: I want to upgrade a Fedora Core 1 Linux machine that is running Samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.5. Initially, I compiled the 3.0.2a source, with defaults, and installed. The installation resides in /usr/local/samba. Can I download the 3.0.5 source, compile and install without breaking anything? Will the configuration be broken? Does anyone know a way to do this cleanly? Anyone's help is