similar to: Rsync 3.0.0pre1 released

hi guys, im trying to backup a cpanel server and made a list in the file with the directories and files to be backed up and also another file with the excluded dir/file list. For some reason when an account is deleted from the server then when rsync is backing it up is not removing this account directory and files. Any idea what could be the problem? Im using version 2.6.8 protocol version

wondering if the only option to have rsync 3 running is have a glibc 2.4+? I have a backup server and many other servers running cpanel on them so a glibc update is not an option as it could skrew up the systems. Any idea or workaround? Or i should to stick with old versions of rsync? Thanx in advance! Manuel

It would appear something snuck in that breaks non-recursive remote listings when talking to a non-3.0.0pre1 version of rsync. The symptom itself is simple enough to see; rather than displaying member directories/regular files/symlinks/etc as one would expect, only non-directories (with the exception of '.') are listed. Other tidbits.. some obvious, some maybe not: - not limited to just

Since i upgraded rsync to the last version all the rsync running through cron are failing, running the same command through SSH is working ok. Wondering how could i troubleshoot it. The cron line is: 0 7 * * * root rsync -azH --stats --delete --partial --timeout=300 --exclude=/proc -e ssh root@xx.xx.xx.xx:/ /home/server7 > /var/log/backupserver7.log 2>&1 The error is: rsync error:

Hi guys, Wondering how i can trace to the problem....im backing up many servers and on all of them im seeing this error. Im backing up between centos machines Thanx in advance!

Hi, Im trying to install rsync 3.0.3 and looks like it needs the popt-devel package. I did find in the net and im not fionding any for centos 4 and 5, anyone have an idea where i can find one? Thank you!

Last cwrsync was 4.1.0, current is 4.2.0. It was avail on sourceforge. Itefix.no decided "we want money for coding and support" - that itself is not wrong. Though _I_ never needed any rsync help on neither linux and windows (including mixed) scenarios. But they killed their sourceforge downloads, all, including past versions of cwrsync, including source. The 4.2.0 client is still

Hi Wayne, im using version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 and looks like the --delete-during parameter is not working correctly, if in the sender side server i delete a directory with files and directories into it after run rsync is not removing that directory/files on the receiver side. Any idea? btw: all the delete options is only to delete the receiver side? i mean using them will not

Hi, We have this backup server running for a long time without problem, it run the rsync command from cron and connect to many other servers geting the files from those servers. One of these servers crashed a week before and we restored it, since then the rsync that connect to this server is giving the following erro after it get some files: rsync error: timeout in data send/receive (code

hi guys, we are using rsycn without problem but today after some problems in one of the servers, the dc tech did find the rsync is effecting in the switch where they have the server connected broadcasting all the ports in the switch at the dc????? This is what the dc tech said: "It appears that your server is broadcasting to every port on the switch that you are connected to" Any

I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre7, the latest pre-release version of the upcoming 3.0.0 release. This release contains fixed exclude checks for a "use chroot = no" daemon that has excludes listed in the config file. This is a partial fix for the 2nd advisory that was released recently. See the rsync security web page for the updated details and a patch for 2.6.9:

I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre7, the latest pre-release version of the upcoming 3.0.0 release. This release contains fixed exclude checks for a "use chroot = no" daemon that has excludes listed in the config file. This is a partial fix for the 2nd advisory that was released recently. See the rsync security web page for the updated details and a patch for 2.6.9:

Just wondering what could cause the following errors: rsync: read errors mapping "/sys/block/loop4/dev": No data available (61) rsync: send_files failed to open "/sys/bus/pci/drivers/Promise_Old_IDE/new_id": Permission denied (13) ERROR: sys/block/ram2/stat failed verification -- update retained. rsync: read errors mapping "/sys/block/ram2/stat": No data available

Hi, im trying to work out my backup with a monthly retention, wondering how i could keep a backup that is 30 days old all the time...i mean....if i rsync the daily backup today with the monthly one in 30 days the monthly will be the monthly backup but the day of the rsync will not be 30 days old, the only option i see is have 3 backed up files rotating every two months to at least keep a 30 days

I have gotten an Rsync daemon set up on my Linux server. But I want to use my Windows XP computer to upload files to an Rsync module on the server. The problem is, Rsync won't work on my Windows computer. I have tried compiling various versions of Rsync in Cygwin, and nothing works. It's not a firewall problem, because I have disabled my firewall and tried to Rsync, and it still

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5008 Summary: make check fails on Cygwin (default-acls) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: Denis.Excoffier@airbus.com

Hi all! We're using cwrsync server 2.0.4 on winxp to keep files up to date between some operator machines. Whenever I run rsync to send files to another machine, the read-only flag gets set. The cwrsync user was created (the install is completely standard)... so I'm thinking it might have something to do with that. Here's my rsyncd.conf: use chroot = false strict modes = false

I've started testing the detect-renamed patch with 2.6.9 and soon 3.0.0pre1. I have an unique situation where I'm rsync'ing to a HSM based filesystem. I've found that the detect-renamed patch works but it appears to do a copy of the file to the new destination. This is particular slow since the file in the HSM based filesystem may only be a stub and all the data is only resident

When do you plan to make first prerelease of 3.0.0 version? -- Regards Stanislaw Gruszka ---------------------------------------------------- CHILDLESS CZY CHILDFREE? Co wybra?: dzieci czy karier?? Jakie s? granice kompromisu w ma??e?stwie? "Dziecioodporna" - bestseller Emily Giffin ju? w ksi?garniach. http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=http%3A%2F%2Fadv.reklama.wp.pl%2Fas%2Fd81.html&sid=1035

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Heads up everyone.... This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.1 code base and is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended for production servers. Use at your own risk. There have been several bug fixes since 3.0.0 that we feel are important to make available to the Samba community for wider testing. The source code can be