similar to: 3 vs 4

Hi guys, I know it's a little off topic but......Wondering if you can help. My wife has been asked to find a writer to produce a story on "The dramatic ramifications of IPV6 on commercial businesses and how it will change the product designs for ordinary household/commercial use in a 5-10 year time frame" So her company hired someone who should have been able to deliver the

Hi, I've seeing the following error messages recorded in logwatch against samba in two FC6 XA-64 systems with samba 3.0.24-7. lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(603) ERROR: string overflow by 1 (24 - 23) in safe_strcpy The main share in use on the first machine is via the guest account with Vista and XP clients, the other has more conventional shares with the Vista PC's as domain members

The way we patch the Windows registry in order to allow it to boot off a virtio-blk drive was initially conceived by comparing the state with virtio-blk driver properly installed, to that without. However, we don't want to replicate the Windows PnP system; rather we need to apply just enough edits to make the system boot, and then let the Windows PnP manager figure out the rest. This series

Greetings - I have not been a long time follower of this list, but I have scanned through the last year or so of archives, after not finding much from google searches. I am hoping someone here can inform me if what I want to do is feasible, and give me some general guidance to follow so that I can continue my research and complete this task. I admin a RH3 system that is primarily a Samba

Hi all, I recently started with Xen (3.1.0) on my new server running Ubuntu Gutsy (7.10) and I''m experiencing very poor network performance on my domU''s. Since my colo provider offers me a /28 of routed public IPs next to one interconnection IP to their routers, I built a Xen configuration as described in http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/360 (a routed

I am very new to Ubuntu/Linux/Samb and have very simple goals: Set up an Ubuntu Server as a Domain Controller to provide single signon for students using study center PC's. All of the PC's are Windows Vista Business. I have successfully added a PC to the domain. I have successfully created a network user and logged on to the PC. However, the Samba log is throwing errors and I have a

The last two lines of example(delayedAssign) give this: > e <- (function(x, y = 1, z) environment())(1+2, "y", {cat(" HO! "); pi+2}) > (le <- as.list(e)) # evaluates the promises $x <promise: 0x032b31f8> $y <promise: 0x032b3230> $z <promise: 0x032b3268> which contrary to the comment appears unevaluated. Is the comment wrong or is it supposed to

http://www.boingboing.net/2006/06/05/play_zork_by_phone.html Let me preface this idea with one comment: I don't have the time to do this - I don't even have time to eat these days. But someone out there has the cycles to do this... and it would be very cool. OK, so now Zork is attached to Asterisk, but using the less-than-clear Festival engine. There are beta tests of the LumenVox

Hello, I've tried to analyze some data with a CMH test. My 3 dimensional contingency tables are 2x2xN where N is usually between 10 and 100. The problem is that there may be 2 strata with opposite counts (the 2x2 contigency table for these are reversed), producing opposite odds ratios that cancle out in the overall statistics. These opposite counts are very important for my analysis, since

Over most of the past year, I have been keeping an eye on the overall LLVM.org open-bug count. Sampling the count (almost) every Monday morning, it is a consistently non-decreasing number. I thought I'd post something about it to the Dev lists, as the count broke 4000 this past week. For your entertainment here's a chart that Excel produced from the data. (To make it more dramatic, I

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: > This seems to go against notes such as > http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance > which claim clang is signifcantly faster than gcc. I think the URL you want is actually http://clang.llvm.org/performance.html. The difference isn't as dramatic when you consider code generation, at least for the

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > This week, I'll see if we can enable MI scheduling by default for x86. I'm > not sure which flags you're using to test it now. But by making it default > and enabling the corresponding coalescer changes, we can be confident that > benchmarking efforts are improving on the same baseline.

On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:34 PM, Albert Graef wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> Given that we don't guarantee backwards compatibility and prefer to >> keep >> our APIs clean and tidy, why should we take this? > > I already said that: To make it easier for out-of-tree frontends to > support at least the last few LLVM versions. If that's a low priority > then

Hi everybody, I'm running an old game called SODA Off-Road Racing in Wine. Everything runs perfectly in the game, except networking. I added test results for it to the AppDB. Does anyone know of anything I can try to get networking working properly in the game? So far I've tried a suggestion from the Wine FAQ to change /etc/hosts to show my IP instead of a loopback address.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:41:55PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: > > This seems to go against notes such as > > http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance > > which claim clang is signifcantly faster than gcc. > > I think the URL you want is actually >

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:57:03PM -0400, Hod McWuff wrote: > Agreed that the oversampling isn't useful in the long term. I'm not sure > what you mean by 'dictioniary overhead'. > > I'd like to see an easy-to-invoke set of parameters that will spare no > cpu expense and produce the tightest theoretically possible output. > > I'm guessing the best of

On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm > sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the > hardware has a certain physical speed, regardless of the presence of > LVM. What am I missing? Well, there's best and worst case scenarios. Best case for file-backed VMs is

Dear R users/developers, simple comparison of code execution time of R 2.7.1 and R 2.7.2 shows a dramatic slowdown of the newer version. Rprof() identifies .Call function as a main cause (see the code below). What happened with R 2.7.2? Kind regards Marek Wielgosz Bayes Consulting ######### Probably useful info ############### ### CPU: Core2Duo T 7300, 2 GB RAM ### WIN XP ### both standard

I am using the defaults that came with the samba RPM package on Mandrake 10.1. For socket options, it has: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 Is that something that may fix the problem if I change it? Pablo mschwartz@dcscorp.net wrote: >Pablo, you might have incorrectly set some settings in smb.conf. Check >your settings for socket options. I don't mess

On Sep 25, 2013, at 11:24 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2013, at 11:36 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> This week, I'll see if we can enable MI scheduling by default for x86. I'm not sure which flags