Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "rsync --files-from"
2002 Jun 21
2
Release 3 of "rzync" new-protocol test
For anyone who'd like to check out the latest release of my "rzync" [sic]
test release, I've just released a new version. For those that might
not have time to look at the code but could provide some feedback based
on a rough description, I've created the following simple web page:
http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html
Here's the tar file of the new
2005 Jul 28
1
Need help with the rsync library and the communication protocol
Hey,
I'm currently adding rsync to pacman (http://archlinux.org/pacman). A static
version of the program is used for rescue operations. Because of this it
is impossible to use the rsync client programm via an execve call and we
need a version implemented in C.
So I started implementing it. But the rsync source isn't beautiful or structured
- it's just a big hunk of code. I spent
2009 Jul 15
1
What happened to librsync?
Hi.
It seems that librsync got left by the roadside ... is there anything
similar for rsync 3.x.x?
Or, is there any easy way to use the library routines in the rsync 3.x.x
source independantly?
The only other open source software I've found that looks similar is xdelta,
and it's still beta for v3.x
Thanks,
Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2009 May 04
8
CentOS DomU on Opensolaris Dom0 - virt-install fails with error in virDomainCreateLinux()
Hi,
I am trying to install CentOS on an Opensolaris Dom0. virt-install fails
with an error in virDomainCreateLinux().
Is this a known issue? Am I missing some step?
manoj@mowgli:~$ uname -a
SunOS mowgli 5.11 snv_101b i86pc i386 i86xpv Solaris
manoj@mowgli:~$ pfexec virt-install
What is the name of your virtual machine? centos
How much RAM should be allocated (in megabytes)? 512
What would
2002 Jun 13
1
2nd release of my new-protocol testing app
I've been having a lot of fun improving my new-protocol testing app.
It's seems to be in pretty good shape (for test code), so I figured I'd
announce another release for those brave souls that may want to help me
in my thinking about a (potential) new rsync protocol. It's a tar.gz
file this time because I broke up the code into multiple files. I named
it "rzync" just
2003 Jun 12
1
questions about librsync
I'm not sure if this is the appropriate forum for questions regarding
librsync, but couldn't find any others.
I'm trying to get librsync working properly on Solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Sparc
servers. The problem is that while librsync appears to compile cleanly, "make
check" fails the sources.test. Does anyone have any insight as to why this
might be? Might I need a specific
2002 Aug 04
1
MD4 bug in rsync for lengths = 64 * n
I am the author of BackupPC (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net) and
I am working on adding rsync support to BackupPC.
I am implementing the server-side in perl, and the client will
run vanilla rsync. (BTW, is there the protocol documented? I've
answered all my questions by looking at the source, but it would
be great to check against any docs.)
I started with librsync 0.9.3 and the
2012 Dec 28
6
problem with installing lustre and ofed
Hello,
I am having trouble installing the server modules for lustre 2.1.4 and use mellanox''s OFED distribution so we may use infiniband. Would you folks look at my procedure and results below and let me know what you think? Thanks very much!
The mellanox ofed installation builds and installs some kernel modules too, so I used this method to ensure OFED compiled against the correct
2010 Sep 03
1
Compiling lustre-client 2.0.0.1 on RHEL 4
Hi,
I tried to compile lustre-client 2.0.0.1 on RHEL4 with kernel
2.6.9-89.0.28.EL-x86_64 and I got 3 errors and 1 warning during the
compile.
The compile is executed with -Werror option, and it fails in all 4 cases
* Error: lustre_compat25.h
CC [M] /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/lustre-2.0.0.1/lustre/fid/fid_handler.o
In file included
from
2005 Sep 30
2
question about librsync : patch function
Hello everybody,
About librsync, does anyone know how to patch the delta without creating
a new file ?
I used the librsync and it always generates a new file, which is
embarrassing if the file is over 1Gb.
I tried to store the new file in RAM, but it saturates the machine.
Is there a possibility to write in the current file to be synchronized,
although this file is currently being
2003 Jun 08
2
state of the rsync nation? (revisited 6/2003 from 11/2000)
I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship,
remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites),
Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the
programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written,
could some people with knowledge in these areas could update martin's
response for the state of rsync,
2008 Apr 21
1
Compile libtheora 1.0beta3 with VS2005
Hi all,
I tried to compile the theora source with VS2005. But it asked for the ogg
library. error message is as follow.
****************************************************************************
Error 1 fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'ogg/ogg.h': No
such file or directory c:\Documents and
Settings\Manoj\Desktop\libtheora-1.0beta3\include\theora\codec.h
64
Error
2002 Apr 24
1
[rproxy-devel] rdiff deltas not very good compared to pysync, why?
On 24 Apr 2002, "Shirish H. Phatak" <shirish@tacitnetworks.com> wrote:
> Since there appears to be a dedicated group of users and lots of
> activity, maybe we can convince Martin to roll in these patches and make
> a new release?
I have been really lax in supporting librsync for the last few months,
because of a new job and taking over maintenance of rsync
2002 Jul 13
0
rZync 0.08 released
I've released the next version of my rZync test app. You can find a
link to it here:
http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html
You should also snag the referenced librsync source, as some important
bugfixes in librsync are needed to compile rzync.
For those that don't know, rZync is my new-protocol test app that I'm
using to try out some ideas on how to improve the rsync
2013 Feb 11
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-installation
hello sir,
./configure worked properly but while giving
make -j 2 command in ubuntu
everything got build properly but at last it showed error as
llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang
collect2: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]
make[4]: *** [/home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/
build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
2013 Feb 11
1
[LLVMdev] llvm
hello sir,
./configure worked properly but while giving
make -j 2 command in ubuntu
everything got build properly but at last it showed error as
llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang
collect2: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]
make[4]: *** [/home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang] Error
1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/
2013 Feb 10
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-installation
hello sir,
in llvm installation ./configure command worked properly but while
giving
make -j 4 command in ubuntu
everything got build properly but at last it showed error as
llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang
collect2: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]
make[4]: *** [/home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/
build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
2013 Feb 10
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-installation
You should use make -j with a number lower than 4, it looks like you ran
out of memory when linking.
On 10 February 2013 15:41, Manoj C <manoj.chinthala at gmail.com> wrote:
> hello sir,
> in llvm installation ./configure command worked properly but while
> giving
> make -j 4 command in ubuntu
>
> everything got build properly but at last it showed error as
>
>
2004 Apr 08
2
[librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 12:36, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 5 Apr 2004, Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> > librsync needs a whole file checksum. Without it, it silently fails for
> > case 1), 3), and 4).
>
> Yes, a whole-file checksum should be used with it. Presumably
> something stronger than md4 like SHA-1.
md4 is probably good enough for most
2007 Nov 16
5
Lustre Debug level
Hi,
Lustre manual 1.6 v18 says that that in production lustre debug level
should be set to fairly low. Manual also says that I can verify that
level by running following commands:
# sysctl portals.debug
This gives ne following error
error: ''portals.debug'' is an unknown key
cat /proc/sys/lnet/debug
gives output:
ioctl neterror warning error emerg ha config console
cat